Members banned from this thread: Frank


Page 28 of 28 FirstFirst ... 18262728
Results 271 to 276 of 276
Thanks Tree82Thanks

Thread: 9-11.. Startling New Evidence of a Conspiracy

  1. #271
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    21,709
    Thanks
    4184

    Quote Originally Posted by Djinn View Post
    Mark this date on your calendars folks; I'm agreeing with Spookycolt. Let's say that you ran a demolition company, and were contracted to demolish three buildings, the sizes of those lost in the WTC attacks. You'd either have to employ a LOT of extra workers, or put in some SERIOUS overtime. After all, they couldn't take their leisurely time about it, or they'd have risked someone coming across evidence of the demolition prep work - which couldn't be effectively hidden.

    So, assuming that you're trying to keep the number of people involved to a minimum, you'd have to go with the overtime plan. Even so, we're talking about spending WEEKS sawing steel beams and installing hundreds of explosive charges. Those buildings were occupied around the clock. No one working late hours reported hearing the noisy work being done on hundreds of floors. No one reported that the poorly-ventilated stairwells (and probably office areas) reeked of acrid welding fumes. No one reported teams of construction workers showing up every night for at least two weeks.

    The "controlled demolition" theory is just too implausible. Too many people would have to be involved, and the odds of one of them speaking up over the past 15 years is much too high.
    Those are all valid points. I'm rather amazed that both buildings fell perfectly straight down, neither leaning to the side. Building 7 always bothered me. Eighty , ninety floors pancaking and neither tower veered off center as it fell. Every joint in every floor must of broke cleanly as to not cause it to fall off center. Building 7, 40 stories, also fell straight down. Amazing how random damage to the structure didn't cause uneven failures as it fell.
    Last edited by THOR; 24th May 2017 at 02:38 PM.

  2. #272
    Senior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,165
    Thanks
    2649

    From
    California
    Quote Originally Posted by THOR View Post
    Those are all valid points. I'm rather amazed that both buildings fell perfectly straight down, neither leaning to the side. Building 7 always bothered me.
    Mr. Thor,

    They could only fall perfectly straight down, because there were no eccentricities in force vectors: the buildings fell in the direction of gravity.

    Building 7 was extensively damaged from the fall of the two buildings across the plaza from it. In addition, an uncontrolled fire burned for several hours prior to it's collapse, further weakening the structure of the building.

  3. #273
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    21,709
    Thanks
    4184

    Quote Originally Posted by Miller47 View Post
    This post is as nutty as the OP.

    Full tilt Bozo.

    Off the reservation crazy.

    9-11 was a successful terrorist attack, nothing more.
    Kind of like the fake moon landings. So many people in the loop. Keeping it all quiet is impossible, so many on their death bed could of come clean.

  4. #274
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    21,709
    Thanks
    4184

    Quote Originally Posted by Kallie Knoetze View Post
    Mr. Thor,

    They could only fall perfectly straight down, because there were no eccentricities in force vectors: the buildings fell in the direction of gravity.

    Building 7 was extensively damaged from the fall of the two buildings across the plaza from it. In addition, an uncontrolled fire burned for several hours prior to it's collapse, further weakening the structure of the building.
    My point is the steel joints would need to let go evenly and at the same time, as forces would tend to move the falling mass off center. I can't picture random damage allowing the forces to be equal in all force vectors. Apparently that is the case in both buildings.
    Last edited by THOR; 24th May 2017 at 02:49 PM.

  5. #275
    Established Member Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,667
    Thanks
    4433

    From
    Brisbane, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by THOR View Post
    Those are all valid points. I'm rather amazed that both buildings fell perfectly straight down, neither leaning to the side. Building 7 always bothered me. Eighty , ninety floors pancaking and neither tower veered off center as it fell. Every joint in every floor must of broke cleanly as to not cause it to fall off center. Building 7, 40 stories, also fell straight down. Amazing how random damage to the structure didn't cause uneven failures as it fell.
    Read the thread buddy. I have explained all the phenomena that intrigue you. I've supplied a multitude of sources; cited reports and quoted experts. There is no mystery anymore.

  6. #276
    Established Member Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,667
    Thanks
    4433

    From
    Brisbane, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by THOR View Post
    My point is the steel joints would need to let go evenly and at the same time, as forces would tend to move the falling mass off center. I can't picture random damage allowing the forces to be equal in all force vectors. Apparently that is the case in both buildings.
    No, 7WTC did not collapse evenly, as only the curtain wall collapse was visible to the public. The interior collapsed earlier. All the data is in the thread and I don't really want to go through all of it again as it's a vast amount.

    I'm a little 'over' discussing 9/11 anymore as it just turns me into a troll magnet.

Page 28 of 28 FirstFirst ... 18262728

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 24th August 2012, 08:37 AM
  2. Conspiracy Theories are just a Conspiracy Theory
    By Illuminutty in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12th August 2012, 04:16 AM
  3. The Startling Plight of China's Leftover Ladies
    By Red Eft in forum Asia & Middle East
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9th May 2012, 06:13 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27th September 2011, 06:58 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19th April 2010, 09:16 AM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed