Thread: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria

Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria is taking the country by storm. Just what's with the dramatic increase of trans people all of a sudden? What you may not realize is that it's not caused by the internet or social media. It occurs under very specific circumstances--by trans women in bathrooms.

We look for someone of the right age unaccompanied in the restroom, and inject them with our nanotrans (a nanotran is a microscopic robot only a few molecules in diameter. It's capable of rewriting someone's entire genetic structure, but we only use them to convince someone that they're transgender). That's how we create gender dysphoria where none existed before. A couple days later, WHAM! They've been assimilated.

The article below disputes this, but since it's from the Advocate you can safely dismiss it as an obviously biased source. Also, there's a lot of words and stuff, so I suggest you skip it altogether.

TL;DR: It's the cyborgs, stupid!

Recently, a new anti-transgender narrative has emerged among the right wing. The narrative states that teens, particularly those assigned female at birth, are going on the internet and convincing themselves that they are transgender because being transgender is “trendy.” It treats transgender identities as a form of social contagion. This theory has been picked up on by numerous hate groups and conservative news outlets, including LifeSite, Barbara Kay, the Catholic Institute for Marital Healing, the Minnesota Family Council, MercatorNet, the Illinois Family Institute, the Family Research Council, the Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal, and an advocacy group of anti-gay therapists.

The entire theory is based on a single poster abstract in 2017 by Dr. Lisa Littman. Poster abstracts are often published when not only is the material too weak to be a journal article, but of insufficient quality to even be accepted for oral presentation at a conference. As such, the academic bar for a poster abstract getting accepted is very low. It was, however, published in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

Littman’s abstract suffers from so many methodological flaws, logical errors, and unacknowledged biases that it fits firmly in the category of junk science. Given how glaring these issues were, it is surprising that the Journal of Adolescent Health published it regardless of how low the bar was set.

'Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria' Is Biased Junk Science

Sounds like the same narrative that gays are on a mission to "convert" other people to being gay, as if it was a religion.

Originally Posted by Ian Jeffrey

Sounds like the same narrative that gays are on a mission to "convert" other people to being gay, as if it was a religion.

Or the "gay bomb" proposal.

Originally Posted by Coyote

I know the image is a joke, but there really was an attempt to create a gay bomb.

Anyway, could it be that there's an increased exposure to hormone mimicking chemicals? Atrazine for example.

Originally Posted by bmanmcfly

I know the image is a joke, but there really was an attempt to create a gay bomb.

Anyway, could it be that there's an increased exposure to hormone mimicking chemicals? Atrazine for example.

Or maybe the biggest bomb makers are the oil companies.....

Or the chemical cos who insist on polluting the earth with their sewage that disrupts and interferes with hormones in various ways.

Originally Posted by Panzareta

Or maybe the biggest bomb makers are the oil companies.....

Or the chemical cos who insist on polluting the earth with their sewage that disrupts and interferes with hormones in various ways.

Ok... remember when you saw bpa free plastics? Do you know why bpa was an issue?

Originally Posted by bmanmcfly

Ok... remember when you saw bpa free plastics? Do you know why bpa was an issue?

https://www.motherjones.com/environm...-plastic-safe/

Originally Posted by Panzareta

https://www.motherjones.com/environm...-plastic-safe/

Good... you're already a step ahead of average here.

Now, when plastic was first made, how many recipes were created that do not leech toxic / hormone mimicking chemicals into the contents??

How many of those recipes are in use?

What are the safe plastics used for?

The unsafe ones?

Why?