Members banned from this thread: OldGaffer


Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 84
Thanks Tree37Thanks

Thread: 250 pages of Huma emails 100% Redacted. Info too sensitive for Congress to see.

  1. #1
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,423
    Thanks
    9158

    From
    United States

    250 pages of Huma emails 100% Redacted. Info too sensitive for Congress to see.

    Tell us again how there was no classified info on Hillary's server.

    The Obama admin is trying as hard as it can to cover for Hillary.



    1/3 of Abedin emails 100% redacted

    Information on Clinton server too sensitive even for Congress


    NEW YORK – Judicial Watch’s release this week of 725 pages of State Department emails involving Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin demonstrates the Obama administration considers a large percentage of the emails sent through Clinton’s private server too sensitive for Congress or the American public to read.


    Of the 725 pages, more than 250 pages were 100 percent redacted, many with “PAGE DENIED” stamped in bold.

    Judicial Watch said the new cache includes previously unreleased email exchanges in which former Abedin “provided influential Clinton Foundation donors special, expedited access to the secretary of state.”

    Judicial Watch added that in many instances, the preferential treatment provided to donors was at the specific request of Clinton Foundation executive Douglas Band.


    “The Abedin emails reveal that the longtime Clinton aide apparently served as a conduit between Clinton Foundation donors and Hillary Clinton while Clinton served as secretary of state. In more than a dozen email exchanges, Abedin provided expedited, direct access to Clinton for donors who had contributed from $25,000 to $10 million to the Clinton Foundation,” Judicial Watch said in a statement announcing the release.


    “In many instances, Clinton Foundation top executive Doug Band, who worked with the Foundation throughout Hillary Clinton’s tenure at State, coordinated closely with Abedin.”
    Read more at 1/3 of Abedin emails 100% redacted

    Countdown until the one trick ponies show up.....3....2.....
    Thanks from Crusher and syrenn

  2. #2
    Going Nuclear- Daily Yetisports6 - Big Wave Champion, Bezerk Champion, All Ball Champion, Magic Gem Champion, Crystal Clear Champion, Flower Power Champion, Space Thieves TD Champion, X-treme Moto Idiot Cross Champion, Micro Tanks Champion, Race Horse Tycoon Champion, Railway Line Champion, Raju Meter 2 Champion, Metal Slug - Kill the Nazis Champion, Decoder Champion, 1 in 24 Speed v32  Champion Crusher's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    20,421
    Thanks
    6817

    From
    California
    Understand this.

    Huma Abedin DOES NOT have the clearance to read the information herself, yet her emails are 100% redacted.

    Are you Liberals not understanding what that means?
    Thanks from Goofball, bmanmcfly and syrenn

  3. #3
    Southern Strategy Liberal OldGaffer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    37,895
    Thanks
    39823

    From
    Nashville, TN
    Connect the dots?
    Thanks from Panzareta

  4. #4
    Southern Strategy Liberal OldGaffer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    37,895
    Thanks
    39823

    From
    Nashville, TN
    Judicial Watch...what could be inaccurate from them, right?

  5. #5
    Veteran Member DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    32,634
    Thanks
    27610

    From
    SWUSA
    How did JW determine Congress was not allowed to read the material? This has noting to do with "sensitive material" this has to do with State Department business. The general public can not demand to know what the State department is doing or access to their work product.

    Only the morons at JW believe they have a right to State Department information. Who gave them that right? It ain't in the Constitution.

    Fuck Judaical Watch.

  6. #6
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,423
    Thanks
    9158

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by OldGaffer View Post
    Judicial Watch...what could be inaccurate from them, right?
    Ding.....Ding.....Ding.......we have a one trick pony winner!
    Thanks from bmanmcfly

  7. #7
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,423
    Thanks
    9158

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Crusher View Post
    Understand this.

    Huma Abedin DOES NOT have the clearance to read the information herself, yet her emails are 100% redacted.

    Are you Liberals not understanding what that means?
    But.....but......but there was no classified info on her server.

    Must be some sensitive yoga class info or something.
    Thanks from bmanmcfly

  8. #8
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,423
    Thanks
    9158

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DebateDrone View Post
    How did JW determine Congress was not allowed to read the material? This has noting to do with "sensitive material" this has to do with State Department business. The general public can not demand to know what the State department is doing or access to their work product.

    Only the morons at JW believe they have a right to State Department information. Who gave them that right? It ain't in the Constitution.

    Fuck Judaical Watch.
    Here's an idea. Why don't you actually read a link for once before commenting. That way you don't embarrass yourself with complete ignorance.

    Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, generated the response by asking McCullough if he could provide the committee, in a secure format, the classified emails transmitted over Clinton’s private email server.

    “I cannot provide a certain segment of them because the agency that owns the information for those emails has limited the distribution on those,” McCullough explained. “They are characterizing them as OrCon, ‘originator control,’ so I can’t give them to even Congress without getting the agency’s permission to provide them.”

    “Which agency?” Chaffetz interjected.

    “I can’t say that in an open hearing sir,” McCullough replied.

    “So you can’t even tell me which agency won’t allow us, as members of Congress, to see something that Hillary Clinton allowed somebody without a security clearance, in a non-protected format to see. That’s correct?” Chaffetz responded, in obvious disbelief.


    Read more at http://ww
    w.wnd.com/2016/08/13-of-abedin-emails-100-redacted/#PqcUFsfP0gTEU07v.99

  9. #9
    Going Nuclear- Daily Yetisports6 - Big Wave Champion, Bezerk Champion, All Ball Champion, Magic Gem Champion, Crystal Clear Champion, Flower Power Champion, Space Thieves TD Champion, X-treme Moto Idiot Cross Champion, Micro Tanks Champion, Race Horse Tycoon Champion, Railway Line Champion, Raju Meter 2 Champion, Metal Slug - Kill the Nazis Champion, Decoder Champion, 1 in 24 Speed v32  Champion Crusher's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    20,421
    Thanks
    6817

    From
    California
    Quote Originally Posted by OldGaffer View Post
    Connect the dots?
    Connect NOTHING.

    She DOES NOT have the clearance. Yet, her emails are 100% redacted. There are no dots, unless you are a dumbass?
    Thanks from bmanmcfly and syrenn

  10. #10
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,423
    Thanks
    9158

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Crusher View Post
    Connect NOTHING.

    She DOES NOT have the clearance. Yet, her emails are 100% redacted. There are no dots, unless you are a dumbass?
    Some here couldn't connect 2 dots with an arrow and a map.
    Thanks from Crusher and bmanmcfly

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dowdy Redacted
    By MaryAnne in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 19th October 2015, 10:52 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20th August 2015, 06:00 AM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 8th May 2015, 07:27 AM
  4. Replies: 243
    Last Post: 23rd June 2014, 01:39 PM
  5. Redacted sections of Obama subpoena revealed
    By BoogyMan in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12th May 2010, 03:43 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed