Members banned from this thread: HadEnough2


Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 100
Thanks Tree89Thanks

Thread: SS Agent "wouldn't take a bullet for Trump"

  1. #31
    Veteran Member TNVolunteer73's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    30,509
    Thanks
    7853

    From
    TN
    IF HE IS NOT GOING TO DO HIS JOB. then he should be replaced.
    Thanks from Dragonfly5 and Madeline

  2. #32
    Member birdzeyez's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    2,142
    Thanks
    1680

    From
    Maryland
    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Dad View Post
    If any Secret Service agent had said this about Barack H Obama or Hillary R Clinton they'd have been fired in thirty seconds. Yet, we have member of this forum applauding it. I didn't like President Obama but not once did I ever advocate that I wanted him assassinated. Really shows how the liberals think. And they wonder why they are now irrelevant in federal politics.
    I certainly didn't "applaud" it. I said that I understood how she felt, which is not "applauding." I also acknowledged that she should lose her job.

    Please show where liberals here did some of the stuff you allege, specific posts please. And then explain how this proves what liberals think (with a broad brush, as you imply).
    Thanks from Blues63

  3. #33
    Member Robert Urbanek's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    3,075
    Thanks
    1319

    From
    Vacaville, CA
    Trump needs a more dedicated SS to protect him.

    SS.jpg
    Thanks from Madeline

  4. #34
    Official HayJenn fan boi knight's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    8,204
    Thanks
    7415

    From
    Galaxy ZRF
    I wouldn't take a BB from a mile for the Weaselheaded Fucknugget.
    Thanks from Blues63

  5. #35
    Member
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    3,535
    Thanks
    1006

    From
    TN
    Quote Originally Posted by The Man View Post

    I don't know. Way I see it, we have a vice president for a reason.

  6. #36
    Veteran Member TNVolunteer73's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    30,509
    Thanks
    7853

    From
    TN
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Urbanek View Post
    Trump needs a more dedicated SS to protect him.

    SS.jpg
    Why would he want to hire Hillary supporters?

  7. #37
    quichierbichen
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    61,959
    Thanks
    33627

    From
    in my head
    What concerns me is that Trump was talking about having his own private security in the WH in addition to (instead of?) the SS. That would be bad. I support the American Praetorian Guard, but no leader in a democratic republic should have a separate force for his own protection, someone not bound by laws and oaths to the US.
    Thanks from The Man and Madeline

  8. #38
    The Un-Holy One The Man's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    34,325
    Thanks
    19748

    From
    Toronto
    Quote Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
    IF HE IS NOT GOING TO DO HIS JOB. then he should be replaced.
    It's a "she". Read the article before you rush to comment

    But, I agree. With you and Rasselas and others here.

    There is no excuse for such behavior. This agent holds a position of immense trust, safeguarding the head of state. No place for this sort of immaturity.

    I don't want to use Putin as a positive example for anything, but I have brought up his own Secret Service, the FSO



    It is my humble opinion that, objectively, the FSO is superior, this way, to the US Secret Service.

    Specifically because of their hard discipline.

    The FSO (and their sister agency, the FSB, which handles counter-intelligence, counter-terrorism, government corruption, as well as high-level, multi-regional organized crime, and other especially heinous crimes of national prominence) descend directly from the KGB. The FSO, in the Soviet days, was simple the 9th Directorate of the KGB, responsible for protecting the General secretary of the Communist Party and the other members of the Politburo


    1st Directorate were the spooks, foreign intelligence, which is now also an independent agency, the SVR (although there are persistent rumors that Putin may indeed bring SVR and FSB back together into one in near future, as he works to rebuild the KGB in which he worked since youth to its former glory...)

    The other Directorates were all counter-intel and border security, all of which is in the hands of the modern FSB.

    But the old traditions did not go anywhere. Most of the officers in leading ranks of all three of these agencies, FSO, FSB, and SVR, are old school career KGB agents.

    These old KGB traditions are pounded into the men of the FSO (and there are no women there, btw), since young years, in the Academy

    including the old KGB motto, in rough translation: "Cold heart, quiet mind, steady hands."

    That means, you don't THINK, you don't FEEL, you don't have your own thoughts and feelings. You follow your orders. Period. If you are told to protect someone, you do so. If you are then told to fucking kill that same person, you do that too, without a second thought They are brainwashed into this. They are kept in uniform jobs, don't get anywhere near a VIP protective detail, until this philosophy becomes their total mantra.

    Things such as this: US Secret Service Cartagena scandal 'involved 20 women' - BBC News

    This is simply impossible in the FSO. Inconceivable. Unimaginable. That would be bringing disgrace to the organization. A man who did that could be killed by his own colleagues, and I mean, literally, fucking killed, physically eliminated, on orders of superiors.

    And going on social media to share your opinions about who you are assigned to guard? Are you joking? lol FSO agents don't even use social media. Nobody knows who any of them are, and that's the way its supposed to be.

    As an example, today, whether any of them like it or not, aside from Putin and Medvedev, Patriarch Kirill of the Orthodox Church gets an FSO detail also


    Keep in mind, again, the FSO descends from the KGB who, in turn, traces their lineage to the Bolshevik Revolution and subsequent formation of the first Commie secret police, the Cheka, by Felix Dzerzhinsky


    Part of the whole reason for the formation of this new force, was to suppress and even perhaps outright purge and exterminate whole classes of Russian society the Bolsheviks/Communists saw as their enemies, including the royalty and nobility; the intelligentsia; Tsarist officers from the old Imperial Army; Cossacks; bourgeois (the rich, merchants and such); kulaks (wealthier peasants who owned the land they used for farming, this was all taken away from them for use of the new collective farms); and, yes, the Orthodox Church, whom the Communists feared as an ideological rival, and hated, as a loyal supporter of the monarchy.

    The Church, today, has sacred icons depicting the horrors of the early years of Bolshevik rule, Chekists ransacking churches and cathedrals, robbing and looting anything valuable, burning crosses, beating, arresting, and killing clerics

    They have many, many martyrs from those days...

    And, while policy towards the Church in the USSR softened over time, the Communist authorities always remained suspicious of them, and the Cheka, then, under Stalin, NKVD, and then KGB kept an eye on them, always, as one of their important tasks. Mistrust and resentment towards the Church was drilled and indeed bred into generations of agents and officers (and I mean bred, as, often enough, sons of Cheka/NKVD/KGB men would follow their fathers into the service; and were raised for it accordingly, since early age).

    And yet, today, things have changed completely, the Church has a privileged position in society now, pretty much like under the Tsars; and the FSO, the modern D-9, now must protect the head of the Church! Yet, nobody grumbles. I don't know if they assign the more religious agents to this job (they had changed their anti-Church philosophy very much in recent years too; the FSO Academy in Moscow actually has a chapel on the premises now!) But they perform their assigned task, without complaint. Whatever their personal feelings on it may be, the hard-as-steel discipline of the KGB overrules all of it. Do your job and keep your mouth shut. Nobody gives a shit about your feelings.

    And that, honestly, is the way it should be, in that kind of work. Too important to be any other way.

    This, in short, is why I think the Russian FSO is superior to the US SS. And I am NOT happy to say that.
    Thanks from Madeline

  9. #39
    Established Member Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,828
    Thanks
    4566

    From
    Under a Southern Sky
    Quote Originally Posted by knight View Post
    I wouldn't take a BB from a mile for the Weaselheaded Fucknugget.
    'Weaselheaded Fucknugget' LOLOL
    Thanks from knight

  10. #40
    Veteran Member Southern Dad's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    32,934
    Thanks
    6855

    From
    A Month Away
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasselas View Post
    What concerns me is that Trump was talking about having his own private security in the WH in addition to (instead of?) the SS. That would be bad. I support the American Praetorian Guard, but no leader in a democratic republic should have a separate force for his own protection, someone not bound by laws and oaths to the US.
    With the way the liberals in the country have been acting, I can completely understand why President Trump may want to have some of his own private security. How many people have said that they would like him dead? Hell Madonna said she's thought about blowing up the White House. And this is all good to the liberals.

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 281
    Last Post: 13th November 2016, 01:34 AM
  2. GOP Pundit: " Put A Bullet In Trump"
    By GordonGecko in forum Current Events
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 29th October 2015, 10:57 AM
  3. Bill Clinton on aliens visiting Earth: "Wouldn't be surprised"
    By meridian5455 in forum Current Events
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 6th April 2014, 07:12 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 14th November 2012, 07:57 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed