Thread: SS Agent "wouldn't take a bullet for Trump"

Originally Posted by Southern Dad

With the way the liberals in the country have been acting, I can completely understand why President Trump may want to have some of his own private security. How many people have said that they would like him dead? Hell Madonna said she's thought about blowing up the White House. And this is all good to the liberals.

Ted Nugent threatened Obama and Hillary and all it got him was an invite to the State of the Union from some GOP troll..while i'm sure you were out there telling them that inviting someone like that is fucked up..being the man of high moral standards you present yourself to be..were you speaking out against that at the time?

Originally Posted by The Man

Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump | Washington Examiner

Is this true? Is "Washington Examiner" a reliable source?

Her FB post is from oct 2016 and she expertly stated in her post to wonder her options open to her if she were not accept Trump's victory. She wondered if she would speak out against Trump in violation of the Hatch act.

She wondered if it were better that she do jail time or take a bullet for someone she did not respect.



http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/se...rticle/2612814

Originally Posted by Rasselas

I do. She's a freakin' SS agent. She doesn't get to have political opinions regarding people she protects (or could be asked to protect).

Donald Trump was not President...or even elected as President. She has to have fidelity to a man not yet President?

Originally Posted by goldendog

Ted Nugent threatened Obama and Hillary and all it got him was an invite to the State of the Union from some GOP troll..while i'm sure you were out there telling them that inviting someone like that is fucked up..being the man of high moral standards you present yourself to be..were you speaking out against that at the time?

No. No, I wasn't because I didn't hear it at the time. Tell me something, why is it that every time there is some liberal acting reprehensibly you all on this forum immediately dig up something done by a conservative to justify it? You can't talk about the conduct, instead you have to whine but he did it, too. That didn't work when we were kids swiping cookies and it doesn't do anything now but make your posts look petty.

Originally Posted by DebateDrone

Her FB post is from oct 2016 and she expertly stated in her post to wonder her options open to her if she were not accept Trump's victory. She wondered if she would speak out against Trump in violation of the Hatch act.

She wondered if it were better that she do jail time or take a bullet for someone she did not respect.



Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump | Washington Examiner

There is no "wondering" here. She flatly states she would "take jail time over a bullet" and "Hatch Act be damned. I am with Her."

Originally Posted by DebateDrone

Donald Trump was not President...or even elected as President. She has to have fidelity to a man not yet President?

Absolutely. She can't do anything that suggests she wouldn't do her job in the future. And she probably did violate the Hatch act. She took an oath. If she can't keep it, she owes it to everyone to resign.

Come to think of it, they actually COULD put her on detail with Bill and/or Hillary.

(From what I have read, the Hilldabeast is rough on her SS detail. BUT, if the woman is good-looking, maybe Slick will give her a souvenir.....)

Originally Posted by Rorschach

(From what I have read, the Hilldabeast is rough on her SS detail. BUT, if the woman is good-looking, maybe Slick will give her a souvenir.....)

So do you believe THIS Secret Service agent's view of Trump....same way you believed that other anti-Clinton Secret Service agent?

I am willing to bet that she has already been reassigned to one the Secret Service's other roles. These people work as a team. They have to count on the others each being willing to do whatever it takes, even if that means taking a bullet for the president. There are many other ways that she could have better handled this. She could have requested a transfer from protectorate detail to one of the other divisions. She could have resigned. What she did, by going public with this is hurt the reputation of the Secret Service. Even if she doesn't resign or get terminated, her career is over with that agency. The Secret Service is supposed to blend in, be part of the background, not put themselves in the limelight.

Originally Posted by Robert Urbanek

There is no "wondering" here. She flatly states she would "take jail time over a bullet" and "Hatch Act be damned. I am with Her."

The way you use phases are not all her words.

Cherrypicking what she wrote is not what she wrote.