Members banned from this thread: Dr Sampson Simpson and ptif219


Page 17 of 47 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 462
Thanks Tree102Thanks

Thread: LGBT Group Threatens Johns Hopkins Over Study on Homosexuality, Transgender

  1. #161
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    59,984
    Thanks
    32215

    From
    in my head
    Quote Originally Posted by aboutenough View Post
    That's fair enough. Testimonies from people that know should be the bare minimum to verify your sexual identity.
    Seems pretty creepy to me, but whatever floats your boat.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure that same sex couples who get married have to be gay. Could be two guys who are really good friends who have given up on love or don't want the burden of wives but like the tax benefits of being a couple.

    Wouldn't discovering that a couple WASN'T gay do away with the defendant's leal objection without removing their actual objections? Or is it okay to make wedding cakes for people whose marriage is a fraud? That's not morally objectionable?
    Thanks from Dangermouse and Panzareta

  2. #162
    Council Member Djinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    40,839
    Thanks
    25482

    From
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by aboutenough View Post
    Just show we live an era of false reality based on the assumption there is Gay and Heterosexual sexual identities. Its all based on Zero science
    You're seriously using etymology to reach conclusions about scientific matters?

  3. #163
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    59,984
    Thanks
    32215

    From
    in my head
    Quote Originally Posted by Djinn View Post
    You're seriously using etymology to reach conclusions about scientific matters?
    He doesn't know the difference. Besides, the world of true believers is a logocentric world--the words themselves have power.
    Thanks from Dangermouse, Djinn and Panzareta

  4. #164
    Veteran Member aboutenough's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    50,084
    Thanks
    2744

    From
    Washington state
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    There is no such thing as a "right to sue someone" exclusive to sexual orientation. You are simply making things up.
    I once had a young teen girl accuse my son of sexual harassment, that was later proved to be a lie. The principle told my wife and I that sexual harassment was a popular crime and with no evidence other then the girls word for it, she suspended my son for 3 days. Another boy was suspended as well and his Dad hired a lawyer to get the suspension dropped. The principle was fired because she decided to suspend with no evidence. This is the same way courts have been acting with Gay people. They make an accusation and without any investigation, the person that supposedly discriminates is issued a fine and or sued. Penalizing Christians has been a popular crime the last two plus years, but its about to end with the Supreme court ruling on the Colorado bakery case

  5. #165
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    59,984
    Thanks
    32215

    From
    in my head
    Quote Originally Posted by aboutenough View Post
    This is the same way courts have been acting with Gay people. They make an accusation and without any investigation, the person that supposedly discriminates is issued a fine and or sued. Penalizing Christians has been a popular crime the last two plus years, but its about to end with the Supreme court ruling on the Colorado bakery case
    You have no idea how "the courts have been acting." You think a variety of judges from around the country, chosen by election or confirmed by senators are comparable to a high school principal who doesn't know the law?

    Seriously?

  6. #166
    Veteran Member aboutenough's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    50,084
    Thanks
    2744

    From
    Washington state
    Quote Originally Posted by Blues63 View Post
    That doesn't change my point in any way. You have no right to discriminate.
    A Christian Tshirt company refused to make Tshirts for a Gay parade and won the case. It was a free speech issue.. Not every business has to go along with their potential customers actions and support it with a product

  7. #167
    Veteran Member aboutenough's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    50,084
    Thanks
    2744

    From
    Washington state
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasselas View Post
    Seems pretty creepy to me, but whatever floats your boat.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure that same sex couples who get married have to be gay. Could be two guys who are really good friends who have given up on love or don't want the burden of wives but like the tax benefits of being a couple.

    Wouldn't discovering that a couple WASN'T gay do away with the defendant's leal objection without removing their actual objections? Or is it okay to make wedding cakes for people whose marriage is a fraud? That's not morally objectionable?
    The intention of this thread is to show whether a person is credible or not as far as proof of who they are or what they are, when it comes to a lawsuit dealing with discrimination. A while back Gays were immigrating to the US from Canada that were getting intense persecution somewhere in the mideast. Immigration required them to prove they were gay. I think that was a reasonable request. I believe they needed a couple witnesses to testify they were Gay before being allowed to enter the states.
    That would be a reasonable request in a court if a person was being charged with discrimination towards a protected group.

  8. #168
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    59,871
    Thanks
    3937

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Jeffrey View Post
    I know what I am saying better than you. I said it is irrelevant whether it is a choice or inborn. That means it does not matter. You are lying and trolling again.
    That is not what you said

  9. #169
    Veteran Member aboutenough's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    50,084
    Thanks
    2744

    From
    Washington state
    Quote Originally Posted by Djinn View Post
    You're seriously using etymology to reach conclusions about scientific matters?
    Scientific evidence. If its wrong, feel free to provide evidence you have.

  10. #170
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    59,871
    Thanks
    3937

    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Jeffrey View Post
    No, I do not, and you cannot show a single instance. You are a liar and a troll.
    You are showing it now

Page 17 of 47 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: ‘There Is No Gay Gene’
    By aboutenough in forum Current Events
    Replies: 575
    Last Post: 12th August 2016, 05:43 AM
  2. Replies: 567
    Last Post: 15th May 2016, 10:00 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 28th June 2015, 08:34 AM
  4. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 24th April 2015, 01:52 PM
  5. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 20th February 2014, 05:03 PM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed