Members banned from this thread: Dr Sampson Simpson and ptif219


Page 3 of 47 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 462
Thanks Tree102Thanks

Thread: LGBT Group Threatens Johns Hopkins Over Study on Homosexuality, Transgender

  1. #21
    Council Member Djinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    42,240
    Thanks
    26923

    From
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
    LGBT oppose medical scientific studies.

    they are like the Climate Deniers that believe mankind cased the 130,000 years of warming
    Read the "special report" - which was never peer-reviewed or published in any scientific journal. It cites researchers who completely disagree with the publisher's conclusions.

    Also @aboutenough - here's the actual HRC post. Where is the "threat" you mention in the thread title?
    Thanks from Michael J

  2. #22
    Council Member Djinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    42,240
    Thanks
    26923

    From
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Explain why the psychos are up in arms about this study.
    It's not a study; it's a "special report." It can't be called a study until it goes through peer-review.

  3. #23
    Cat-tastic Babba's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,974
    Thanks
    45536

    From
    So. Md.
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Explain why the psychos are up in arms about this study.
    Are you calling gays psychos?

  4. #24
    Member fenrir's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    2,553
    Thanks
    468

    From
    Yoknapatawpha County
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    Um, that is reflexive gibberish.

    Legitimate medical journals do peer review before publishing.
    Peer review has some "problems."

    Science Is Suffering Because of Peer Review’s Big Problems
    Thanks from ptif219

  5. #25
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    24,502
    Thanks
    6747

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Djinn View Post
    It's not a study; it's a "special report." It can't be called a study until it goes through peer-review.
    LMAO ....

    Whatever you say.

  6. #26
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    24,502
    Thanks
    6747

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Babba View Post
    Are you calling gays psychos?
    No .....

    LBGTABCDEFG ...... are psychos.

  7. #27
    Council Member Djinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    42,240
    Thanks
    26923

    From
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by fenrir View Post
    Of course it has problems; it's a system, and all systems have their share of problems. That doesn't mean the system is useless. It means it needs ongoing refinement. Your link says this in the last paragraph.

  8. #28
    Council Member Djinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    42,240
    Thanks
    26923

    From
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    LMAO ....

    Whatever you say.
    It's not "whatever I say." It's the rules of scientific publication. Without peer reviews, anyone could publish any stupid thing in any magazine or newspaper, and legitimately call it a "scientific study." Peer review holds the work to a level of standards that would otherwise not exist.
    Thanks from Leo2

  9. #29
    Member fenrir's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    2,553
    Thanks
    468

    From
    Yoknapatawpha County
    Quote Originally Posted by Babba View Post
    Are you calling gays psychos?
    They may not be "psycho" but they harm us all when they try to thwart science in the name of politics.
    Thanks from John T Ford

  10. #30
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    61,788
    Thanks
    4040

    Quote Originally Posted by Djinn View Post
    Of course it has problems; it's a system, and all systems have their share of problems. That doesn't mean the system is useless. It means it needs ongoing refinement. Your link says this in the last paragraph.
    yes it does. It has lost credibility so it is no longer trusted

Page 3 of 47 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: ‘There Is No Gay Gene’
    By aboutenough in forum Current Events
    Replies: 575
    Last Post: 12th August 2016, 06:43 AM
  2. Replies: 567
    Last Post: 15th May 2016, 11:00 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 28th June 2015, 09:34 AM
  4. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 24th April 2015, 02:52 PM
  5. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 20th February 2014, 06:03 PM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed