Members banned from this thread: TennesseeRain


Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 202
Thanks Tree83Thanks

Thread: torches ...seriously?

  1. #61
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,140
    Thanks
    21608

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by THOR View Post
    Not even close.
    Well, that's EXACTLY what a lot of your compadres think, or thought back then. The John Birch Society, for instance. They were always saying Eisenhower was a "closet Communist". That was the exact phrase they used, too.

    Are you one of those guys who looks for Communists in your closet and under your bed before you go to sleep every night, Thor?

    Here's a newsflash for you: Communism is Dead. It really is. It lies utterly discredited, as an economic system, the whole wide world over. Just about the ONLY places Communism still survives anymore is in Pyongyang, North Korea; Havana, Cuba; and Cambridge, Massachusetts. Oh, and maybe in the People's Republic of Boulder (Colorado). Everywhere else? Dead. Deader than a doornail.

    If you're still getting heart palpitations about Commies, relax, Thor. They're gone. The monsters are gone now, son. You can go back to sleep.

  2. #62
    Nuisance Factor Yeti 8 Jungle Swing Champion, YetiSports 4 - Albatross Overload Champion, YetiSports7 - Snowboard FreeRide Champion, Alu`s Revenge Champion boontito's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    87,114
    Thanks
    62599

    From
    out of nowhere!
    Quote Originally Posted by Sassy View Post
    Maybe there is. IDK. Is that considered speech? Or did you mean to say second amendment? There are limits on the second amendment. We are not (were not, in Texas, at least, at that time) allowed to 'brandish' weapons in that way, but the Black Panthers were permitted as a matter of protected speech.
    I'm seriously curious why it is you want to talk about everyone except the people this thread is about who were marching with torches?

    I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest this might be why someone has referred to you as an apologist.
    Thanks from BigLeRoy and TennesseeRain

  3. #63
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,140
    Thanks
    21608

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    Liberals have tried.

    Well. Touche. Gotta give you that round.

  4. #64
    ~Standing My Ground~ Sassy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    42,624
    Thanks
    16610

    From
    God Bless Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by boontito View Post
    I'm seriously curious why it is you want to talk about everyone except the people this thread is about who were marching with torches?

    I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest this might be why someone has referred to you as an apologist.
    Yeah no. She knows better after all these years. She must be drunk. It's quite obvious that I wonder why one is acceptable and the other not. I stated very clearly I am against BOTH.

  5. #65
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,140
    Thanks
    21608

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by Blah View Post
    Somebody buy those shits some decent pitch forks.
    No, they'll have to raid a local Wal-Mart and STEAL them.

    Really, think this through. No billionaire or millionaire is gonna buy a bunch of pitchforks for a mob of wildly irrational rioters.

    The men who smoke cigars don't like riots.

  6. #66
    Galactic Ruler Spookycolt's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2012
    Posts
    60,149
    Thanks
    10995

    From
    By the wall
    Quote Originally Posted by Davocrat View Post
    A few people said that in one incident. But you won't find it on the Black Lives Matter website.

    On the other hand, you WILL find statements saying whites are superior to blacks on any number of white nationalist sites.

    Next?
    Why do you surf white nationalist sites?

  7. #67
    On the Diversary Committe TennesseeRain's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    81,623
    Thanks
    50441

    From
    In the Witness Protection Program
    Quote Originally Posted by Sassy View Post
    Yeah no. She knows better after all these years. She must be drunk. It's quite obvious that I wonder why one is acceptable and the other not. I stated very clearly I am against BOTH.
    against BOTH makes you an apologist for nazis. And unlike you, I'm not only sober, I'm not a self medicated bipolar individual.

  8. #68
    Nuisance Factor Yeti 8 Jungle Swing Champion, YetiSports 4 - Albatross Overload Champion, YetiSports7 - Snowboard FreeRide Champion, Alu`s Revenge Champion boontito's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    87,114
    Thanks
    62599

    From
    out of nowhere!
    Quote Originally Posted by Sassy View Post
    Yeah no. She knows better after all these years. She must be drunk. It's quite obvious that I wonder why one is acceptable and the other not. I stated very clearly I am against BOTH.
    Yeah no.

    When someone says to you, look at those people behaving badly over there, what are your thoughts on that. And you make the proactive point to skip over condemning them and instead point out that they are acting as bad as another group... you're providing them cover. You're running interference. You're downplaying the bad behavior. You're softening the blow. How's that?

    Doing that kind of thing opens you up to being called some variation of an "apologist".

  9. #69
    ~Standing My Ground~ Sassy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    42,624
    Thanks
    16610

    From
    God Bless Texas
    against BOTH maes you an apologist for nazis
    No it doesn't. I am saying no one should have the right to march or demonstrate with weapons or torches or anything dangerous to others.

  10. #70
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    76,495
    Thanks
    39541

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by Sassy View Post
    Maybe there is. IDK. Is that considered speech? Or did you mean to say second amendment? There are limits on the second amendment. We are not (were not, in Texas, at least, at that time) allowed to 'brandish' weapons in that way, but the Black Panthers were permitted as a matter of protected speech.
    correct. You don't know what you're talking about.
    Glad we agree.
    Thanks from TennesseeRain

Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ted Cruz predicts- Pitchforks, Torches. Chaos.
    By thrilling in forum Current Events
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 28th November 2016, 01:18 PM
  2. Replies: 81
    Last Post: 5th November 2014, 04:35 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed