Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 67
Thanks Tree38Thanks

Thread: Flynn told associate Russia sanctions would be ‘ripped up,’

  1. #51
    Moderator HayJenn's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    44,732
    Thanks
    34565

    From
    CA
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Lmao... so corrupt you don't even realize what you are saying ... I am still shocked that you are looked to for objective decisions.

    Anyway, you should really bet your house on this one because you've been wrong EVERY OTHER TIME... but I'm sure this time you are right and Trump will be impeached.

    So what if Flynn was in the inner circle, he ONLY value to the FBI is as a liar. Do you really find the word of a liar to be valuable... oh wait, you EXCLUSIVELY trust liars.

    The tainted evidence is because of FBI agents being fired for bias... yes, when people who are supposed to be able to demonstrate their objectivity and they prove they are unable to be objective they SHOULD be fired... and their findings are tainted because you can question "was this real evidence or was this just the biased agent trying for a promotion?"

    Since you can't know for sure, that evidence is disregarded.
    More blah, blah, blah

    What's the common thread in the Mueller investigation among so many in this administration?

    Sanctions, Sanctions.

    That's what the Russia's were hoping for in exchange for meddling in the elections.
    Thanks from Babba

  2. #52
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    15,673
    Thanks
    2502

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by HayJenn View Post
    More blah, blah, blah

    What's the common thread in the Mueller investigation among so many in this administration?

    Sanctions, Sanctions.

    That's what the Russia's were hoping for in exchange for meddling in the elections.
    Lmao... Remember when we found out what that meant? They put an ad on Facebook that hit 0.17% of voters in the us.

    Of course, that was what trump was saying openly, that they would no longer fund and support Isis. The entire reason that Russia was involved was to fight Isis.

    THE ABSOLUTE BEST argument you could make would be that Russia hacked the DNC computers... Which means that Russian election meddling was exposing Clinton meddling in the elections. Except Russia did not hack the DNC computers, the data was transferred at speeds suggestive of a thumb drive, not transcontinental network traffic speeds.

    Which, if Clinton had not been so corrupt then there would not have been anything to hurt her chances.

    You probably never heard a whole lot about the RNC hack? Do you want to know why? They weren't doing anything criminal and nobody cares to read mundane agenda plans and meeting schedules.

  3. #53
    Moderator HayJenn's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    44,732
    Thanks
    34565

    From
    CA
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Lmao... Remember when we found out what that meant? They put an ad on Facebook that hit 0.17% of voters in the us.

    Of course, that was what trump was saying openly, that they would no longer fund and support Isis. The entire reason that Russia was involved was to fight Isis.

    THE ABSOLUTE BEST argument you could make would be that Russia hacked the DNC computers... Which means that Russian election meddling was exposing Clinton meddling in the elections. Except Russia did not hack the DNC computers, the data was transferred at speeds suggestive of a thumb drive, not transcontinental network traffic speeds.

    Which, if Clinton had not been so corrupt then there would not have been anything to hurt her chances.

    You probably never heard a whole lot about the RNC hack? Do you want to know why? They weren't doing anything criminal and nobody cares to read mundane agenda plans and meeting schedules.
    It was much, much than Facebook.

    https://www.npr.org/2017/09/22/55295...ussian-hacking

    And it was Wikileaks that hacked Podesta's email....maybe another thing you didn't know?

    But anyway, please continue with your fantasy that no more shoes are going to drop in the investigation.

  4. #54
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    5,547
    Thanks
    3138

    From
    EU. We're ready for you, Vladimir.
    Lock him up... Lock him up... Lock him up...

  5. #55
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    15,673
    Thanks
    2502

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by HayJenn View Post
    It was much, much than Facebook.

    https://www.npr.org/2017/09/22/55295...ussian-hacking

    And it was Wikileaks that hacked Podesta's email....maybe another thing you didn't know?

    But anyway, please continue with your fantasy that no more shoes are going to drop in the investigation.
    Wikileaks are not hackers...

    Oh, you mean the failed attempt to hack the voting machines is how Russia hacked the election, do you just type words out or did you actually think this was a convincing argument?

  6. #56
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    15,673
    Thanks
    2502

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by CEngelbrecht View Post
    Lock him up... Lock him up... Lock him up...
    Ya, Flynn is probably fucked, but I think things are coming to a head pretty soon.

  7. #57
    Moderator HayJenn's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    44,732
    Thanks
    34565

    From
    CA
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Wikileaks are not hackers...

    Oh, you mean the failed attempt to hack the voting machines is how Russia hacked the election, do you just type words out or did you actually think this was a convincing argument?
    Wikileaks are the ones that hacked Podesta's email. How can you NOT know that???

    I never said they successfully hacked the voting machines...I think it was more of a "try" to see how far they could get for the next time around.

    And I've always used the word "meddled" in the election - so again, I have no idea what your rambling on about again.
    Thanks from Babba

  8. #58
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    15,673
    Thanks
    2502

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by HayJenn View Post
    Wikileaks are the ones that hacked Podesta's email. How can you NOT know that???

    I never said they successfully hacked the voting machines...I think it was more of a "try" to see how far they could get for the next time around.

    And I've always used the word "meddled" in the election - so again, I have no idea what your rambling on about again.
    I know it to be false because wikileaks are not hackers... I don't know who told you otherwise, but it's simply not true.

    Podesta got hacked in a phishing scheme and literally gave out his password, so, any login to his network would appear as legitimate and therefore there is NO WAY TO SAY WHO DID IT... And if it was access from Russia, there would be a clear network transmission log that could be examined.

    So, the big crime that's caused a more than year long hissy fit from the left is TRYING AND FAILING to have an influence on your election?

  9. #59
    Moderator HayJenn's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    44,732
    Thanks
    34565

    From
    CA
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    I know it to be false because wikileaks are not hackers... I don't know who told you otherwise, but it's simply not true.

    Podesta got hacked in a phishing scheme and literally gave out his password, so, any login to his network would appear as legitimate and therefore there is NO WAY TO SAY WHO DID IT... And if it was access from Russia, there would be a clear network transmission log that could be examined.

    So, the big crime that's caused a more than year long hissy fit from the left is TRYING AND FAILING to have an influence on your election?
    LOL - so Wikileaks didn't publish Podesta's email? You know, within hours of the leaked Hollywood Access tapes? I guess that was just by chance right?

    And please do tell, how did Roger Stone know that the emails were coming out before Wikileaks published them?

    And actual cyber security expert's disagree with you when it comes to Russian involvement with the hacked emails.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...emails-n616486


    But I'm guessing you think more about that they do?

  10. #60
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    15,673
    Thanks
    2502

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by HayJenn View Post
    LOL - so Wikileaks didn't publish Podesta's email? You know, within hours of the leaked Hollywood Access tapes? I guess that was just by chance right?

    And please do tell, how did Roger Stone know that the emails were coming out before Wikileaks published them?

    And actual cyber security expert's disagree with you when it comes to Russian involvement with the hacked emails.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...emails-n616486


    But I'm guessing you think more about that they do?
    Publishing is not hacking.

    Roger stone talked to Assange who told him what happened.

    Yes, I know they have a story to sell, but rule #1 of hacking is to not let them know where you come from. So, a hacker from China would make people believe the source was Russia or somewhere else...

    If the hack appears from Russia, that's the least likely place it originates from. However, people examined the metadata of the files released and the metadata showed that the files were copied at over 1000MB/s... Can't get that speed over a network across the street, Nevermind bouncing to Russia.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 18th May 2017, 06:42 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 17th February 2017, 04:13 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16th February 2017, 04:15 PM
  4. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10th February 2017, 02:20 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10th February 2017, 08:21 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed