Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
Thanks Tree7Thanks

Thread: Obama blamed for Libyan slave trade

  1. #31
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    43,787
    Thanks
    9082

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    Are you simply insulting me because of your own failures in this thread?
    I have no failures in this thread. Keep crying.

  2. #32
    Established Member
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,055
    Thanks
    4694

    From
    In my mind
    Quote Originally Posted by Goofball View Post
    I have no failures in this thread. Keep crying.
    If you say so.

  3. #33
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    43,787
    Thanks
    9082

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprockey View Post
    Wait. What?

    Last week "we" were blaming Hillary. How am I expected to keep up?!
    One of the many joint Barry/Cankles fuck ups.

  4. #34
    Veteran Member Moorhuhn Wanted Champion Hollywood's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    65,994
    Thanks
    31098

    From
    Memphis, Tn.
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller47 View Post
    There's the lie again.

    She won ALMOST 3,000,000 more popular votes.

    And, she lost the EC, the vote that matters, in a landslide.
    Oh, we're sorry, was it ONLY 2.89 million or something?

  5. #35
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    14,532
    Thanks
    2368

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
    Oh, we're sorry, was it ONLY 2.89 million or something?
    If your team loses the super bowl do you then complain "but my team got more tackles than the other team so my team should have won in spite of the score?" If Not, why Not?

  6. #36
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    43,787
    Thanks
    9082

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
    Oh, we're sorry, was it ONLY 2.89 million or something?
    And not a single one of them mean jack diddly poop.


  7. #37
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    43,787
    Thanks
    9082

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    If your team loses the super bowl do you then complain "but my team got more tackles than the other team so my team should have won in spite of the score?" If Not, why Not?
    More like, my team has more fans in the stands, so we win!
    Thanks from bmanmcfly

  8. #38
    Veteran Member Moorhuhn Wanted Champion Hollywood's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    65,994
    Thanks
    31098

    From
    Memphis, Tn.
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    If your team loses the super bowl do you then complain "but my team got more tackles than the other team so my team should have won in spite of the score?" If Not, why Not?
    Sorry, but that was gibberish.

  9. #39
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    14,532
    Thanks
    2368

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
    Sorry, but that was gibberish.
    Such nonsensical comments from the peanut gallery.

  10. #40
    Senior Member
    Joined
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    8,053
    Thanks
    1363

    From
    Banned
    Quote Originally Posted by cpicturetaker12 View Post
    Hey readers, this is from the OPINION page. Also does anyone know who this guy is? He writes for INSTANT-PUNDIT--PJ media. Pretty RIGHT WING.


    PS (From Foreign Policy Magazine, "synthesized")

    Libya: In 2011, Clinton was a strong proponent of regime change in Libya (as was Trump). It is forgotten today that a primary justification she offered for the U.S. military role in Libya was to pay back allies for Afghanistan. As she stated in late March 2011: “We asked our allies, our NATO allies, to go into Afghanistan with us 10 years ago. They have been there, and a lot of them have been there despite the fact they were not attacked.… When it comes to Libya, we started hearing from the U.K., France, Italy, other of our NATO allies. This was in their vital national interest.” Academic research shows that great powers enjoy freedom of action to avoid becoming dragged into wars involving allies, but the Libya regime change intervention was, unfortunately, one that the Obama administration chose to fully support, despite misleading the American people at the time that it was not the goal. Obama correctly labeled not planning for the postwar scenario his “worst mistake” and correctly described Libya as a “mess.”
    Did you read the subtitle of your cite?

    The Obama administration said it was just trying to protect civilians. Its actions reveal it was looking for regime change.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Thai Slave Trade
    By Madeline in forum Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 1st August 2015, 07:11 AM
  2. Somehow, This Is All Gonna Be Blamed On Obama...
    By NiteGuy in forum Current Events
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 7th September 2013, 01:08 AM
  3. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 3rd August 2012, 01:51 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19th December 2008, 04:57 PM
  5. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 9th November 2008, 04:27 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed