Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Uranium 1, Part 4! FAKE news, fake outrage, deflection from MUELLER & RUSSIA

  1. #1
    Banned Camp
    Jul 2015


    Uranium 1, Part 4! FAKE news, fake outrage, deflection from MUELLER & RUSSIA

    Asked answered more times than should have sucked up ink, print, TAX DOLLARs, the GOP outrage 'machine' and keystrokes. We'll start out with the basic BULLSHIT GOP memes. Remember, it all started with the book CLINTON CASH which was written by the Senior editor of, NOT the WSJ or Washington Times or even the Washington Examiner, he was the senior editor of BREITBART.

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Peter Franz Schweizer
    (born November 24, 1964) is an American investigative journalist, novelist, author and political consultant. He is the president of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) and a former William J. Casey Research Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.[1] He is also Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large.[2]


    Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.

    Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. uranium deposits to a Russian company was a quid pro quo exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. See Example( s )



    In the months leading up to the 2016 United States presidential election, stories abounded about the relationships between the Clinton Foundation and various foreign entities.

    May 2015 saw the publication of a book called Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, an exposé of alleged Clinton Foundation corruption written by Peter Schweizer, a former Hoover Institution fellow and editor-at-large at the right-wing media company Breitbart.

    A chapter in the book suggests that the Clinton family and Russia each may have benefited from a “pay-for-play” scheme while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, involving the transfer of U.S. uranium reserves to the new Russian owners of an international mining operation in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    The mining company, Uranium One, was originally based in South Africa, but merged in 2007 with Canada-based UrAsia Energy. Shareholders there retained a controlling interest until 2010, when Russia’s nuclear agency, Rosatom, completed purchase of a 51% stake. Hillary Clinton played a part in the transaction insofar as it involved the transfer of ownership of a material deemed important to national security — uranium, amounting to one-fifth of U.S. reserves (a fraction re-estimated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) at closer to one-tenth of the United States’ uranium production capacity in 2017) — thus requiring the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), on which the U.S. Secretary of State sits.,,,

    During the same time frame that the acquisition took place, the Clinton Foundation accepted contributions from nine individuals associated with Uranium One totaling more than $100 million, Schweizer claimed in Clinton Cash. Among those who followed Schweizer in citing the transaction as an instance of alleged Clinton corruption was GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, who said during a June 2016 speech in New York City:...

    The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton’s to Veto or Approve

    Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.

    All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved...

    Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations

    Why some of the critics’ charges during the campaign went too far

    In June 2016, we fact-checked a statement by then-candidate Donald Trump -- who was running against Clinton for president -- that Clinton’s State Department "approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation."
    We gave the statement a rating of Mostly False. While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there was simply no proof of any quid pro quo.
    Trump’s allegation went too far in two ways. One, Trump seemed to say that Clinton bears all of the responsibility for the deal’s approval. That is incorrect.

    What you need to know about Hillary Clinton, Russia, and uranium | PolitiFact
    Last edited by cpicturetaker12; 23rd December 2017 at 03:13 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Why Fake News want Trump to sack Mueller
    By Rob Larrikin in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 31st October 2017, 05:09 AM
  2. Fake News finally drops their 'Russia did it' lie
    By Rob Larrikin in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 28th August 2017, 02:15 PM
  3. More fake racism from fake news media
    By Robert Urbanek in forum Racism
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 17th July 2017, 07:11 PM
  4. Fake News Network (CNN) caught Staging Fake Protest.
    By TNVolunteer73 in forum Current Events
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 8th June 2017, 03:28 PM
  5. Fake News Network Finally Retracts Fake Story
    By NightSwimmer in forum Current Events
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 24th May 2017, 07:06 AM

Tags for this Thread

Facebook Twitter RSS Feed