Thread: Majorities back investigations of Trump from Russia to alleged hush money (POLL)

Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und

They based this on..... wait for it..... all them polls over sampling democrats.

No, October poll aggregates all had Clinton winning the popular vote. She did, just with a crucially smaller margin than predicted, by about two points.

Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und

I know enough that they are usually not to be trusted.

But you just cited one. Was it because the title had the word "facts" in it that made you think it was factual? If you read the fucking things all their results came from Pew research POLLS.

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

But you just cited one. Was it because the title had the word "facts" in it that made you think it was factual? If you read the fucking things all their results came from Pew research POLLS.

Are you not well?


It was an example showing a poll that would not be liked by those on the left. I made no judgment call on it. it was to show, one usually can find a poll for their argument anywhere. wow.... thick.

Originally Posted by Singularity

FiveThirtyEight has been a major poll aggregate for years.

ESPN paid Silver millions to quit The New York Times and set up his own subsidiary of theirs after he correctly predicted the outcomes of the 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012 elections.

Gee, what does Silver have to say about these midterms? Or is FOX now paying him to say what they want you to hear?

Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und

Legit followers? that means nothing to me.


the pundits, the msm, and it's followers, many in present company, believed polls that over sampled democrats and thought hillary would win in a landslide, this is fact,

Which poll just prior to the election had her winning in a landslide?

Originally Posted by Singularity

No, October poll aggregates all had Clinton winning the popular vote. She did, just with a crucially smaller margin than predicted, by about two points.

So you don't wonder why they were all so off for all this time only to get closer at the end?



OCT 27 numerous polls had clinton up by double digits.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...ls/president/#

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

Which poll just prior to the election had her winning in a landslide?

Oct 27.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...ls/president/#


quinnipiac, cnbc, PEW, etc.

Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und

So you don't wonder why they were all so off for all this time only to get closer at the end?



OCT 27 numerous polls had clinton up by double digits.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...ls/president/#

That's why you don't rely on individual polls, you rely on aggregates and analysis.

Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und

are you really that obtuse?I was showing it as an example of a poll that doesn't follow the regular narrative, suggesting as the poster said "it is what it is". I made no commentary on this polls accuracy or lack of. I'm sorry this is a concept above your level.

and now you are a fucking liar. You claimed independents are mostly democrats and then labeled a poll as "pesky facts" trying to prove you are right.

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

Gee, what does Silver have to say about these midterms? Or is FOX now paying him to say what they want you to hear?

Silver works for Disney, ultimately.