Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 180
Thanks Tree114Thanks

Thread: Mueller /Cohen - Verifies Part of the "Dossier"

  1. #101
    El Psy Kongroo Lunchboxxy's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    13,555
    Thanks
    13329

    From
    Oregon
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    They used the part about the Prostitutes.
    Lol, link?

    Why would they use something about Trump getting prostitutes on a warrent for Carter Page? Wanna think about that for like 5 seconds maybe?

    The FISA warrant should not have been issued since the FBI deceived the court.
    Nah, they didn’t. The DOJ revealed that the dossier information came from a person paid by Trump’s opponent. Here is the literal text from the FISA application where it is disclosed




    You seem to think it is okay the democrats in the FBI are corrupt. Mueller is as corrupt as any as his history shows
    You seem to live in an alternate reality where you can invent a new definition of corruption
    Thanks from NightSwimmer, boontito and HayJenn

  2. #102
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    65,506
    Thanks
    4225

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunchboxxy View Post
    Lol, link?

    Why would they use something about Trump getting prostitutes on a warrent for Carter Page? Wanna think about that for like 5 seconds maybe?



    Nah, they didn’t. The DOJ revealed that the dossier information came from a person paid by Trump’s opponent. Here is the literal text from the FISA application where it is disclosed






    You seem to live in an alternate reality where you can invent a new definition of corruption
    Where does it say it came from the Hillary campaign. As always you lie. Thee is no way a judge would allow political opposition research to be used without proof of corroboration

  3. #103
    Wrinkly Member Dangermouse's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    23,887
    Thanks
    22414

    From
    Sunny Bournemouth, Dorset
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    Where does it say it came from the Hillary campaign. As always you lie. Thee is no way a judge would allow political opposition research to be used without proof of corroboration
    "The identified person" is a clue, but who do you think the last sentence refers to?

  4. #104
    El Psy Kongroo Lunchboxxy's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    13,555
    Thanks
    13329

    From
    Oregon
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    Where does it say it came from the Hillary campaign. As always you lie. Thee is no way a judge would allow political opposition research to be used without proof of corroboration
    It says right there that it came from someone who was looking for information to discredit candidate #1s campaign. That clearly disclosed that it is political opposition research.

    If the judge needed to know exactly who it was, they would have had them disclose it.

  5. #105
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    65,506
    Thanks
    4225

    Quote Originally Posted by Dangermouse View Post
    "The identified person" is a clue, but who do you think the last sentence refers to?
    As I said it does name the Hillary campaign

  6. #106
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    65,506
    Thanks
    4225

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunchboxxy View Post
    It says right there that it came from someone who was looking for information to discredit candidate #1s campaign. That clearly disclosed that it is political opposition research.

    If the judge needed to know exactly who it was, they would have had them disclose it.
    That could be anybody

  7. #107
    Thought Provocateur NightSwimmer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    36,114
    Thanks
    33541

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    Thee [sic] is no way a judge would allow political opposition research to be used without proof of corroboration
    I agree. The fact that numerous different FISA Judges (most of whom were Republican appointees) signed off on the warrant should dispel any suspicion that the warrant was illegally obtained.

  8. #108
    Going Nuclear- Daily Yetisports6 - Big Wave Champion, Bezerk Champion, All Ball Champion, Magic Gem Champion, Crystal Clear Champion, Flower Power Champion, Space Thieves TD Champion, X-treme Moto Idiot Cross Champion, Micro Tanks Champion, Race Horse Tycoon Champion, Railway Line Champion, Raju Meter 2 Champion, Metal Slug - Kill the Nazis Champion, Decoder Champion, 1 in 24 Speed v32  Champion Crusher's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    24,507
    Thanks
    7815

    From
    California
    Quote Originally Posted by HayJenn View Post
    LOL - I had a feeling the Trump Supporters here would just put their hands over the eyes and ears and say, blah, blah, blah - we can't hear or see anything that would disagree with our implicate bias. We don't believe in facts either..
    No... you believe in fake news. What you put up in the O.P. has zero evidence of being true and is likely total Leftwing bullshit.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...p-russia-prob/

    Whereas my statement, "The Clinton/Steele Dossier is a political hit piece. Clinton paid Steele to collude with Russians to try and make Trump look bad", is 100% true and verifiable.

  9. #109
    Moderator HayJenn's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    50,419
    Thanks
    38812

    From
    CA
    Quote Originally Posted by Crusher View Post
    No... you believe in fake news. What you put up in the O.P. has zero evidence of being true and is likely total Leftwing bullshit.

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...p-russia-prob/

    Whereas my statement, "The Clinton/Steele Dossier is a political hit piece. Clinton paid Steele to collude with Russians to try and make Trump look bad", is 100% true and verifiable.
    Sorry, an op-ed from some right wing source so full of bias doesn't mean squat.

    Where as McClatchy is a solid source.

    You do know that other parts of the dossier have proven to be true right?

  10. #110
    Going Nuclear- Daily Yetisports6 - Big Wave Champion, Bezerk Champion, All Ball Champion, Magic Gem Champion, Crystal Clear Champion, Flower Power Champion, Space Thieves TD Champion, X-treme Moto Idiot Cross Champion, Micro Tanks Champion, Race Horse Tycoon Champion, Railway Line Champion, Raju Meter 2 Champion, Metal Slug - Kill the Nazis Champion, Decoder Champion, 1 in 24 Speed v32  Champion Crusher's Avatar
    Joined
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    24,507
    Thanks
    7815

    From
    California
    Quote Originally Posted by HayJenn View Post
    Sorry, an op-ed from some right wing source so full of bias doesn't mean squat.

    Where as McClatchy is a solid source.

    You do know that other parts of the dossier have proven to be true right?
    You keep on believing McClatchy is not feeding you "fake news". We'll bookmark this one for you.

Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FBI wanted "Access Hollywood" tapes during Cohen raid
    By bajisima in forum Current Events
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 12th April 2018, 05:59 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 8th August 2017, 08:11 PM
  3. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 13th June 2017, 08:13 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 30th April 2017, 06:15 PM
  5. Replies: 36
    Last Post: 24th June 2016, 01:54 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed