Page 6 of 18 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 180
Thanks Tree146Thanks

Thread: Pence says Mueller should "wrap it up" ..payments a "personal matter".

  1. #51
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    35,132
    Thanks
    30572

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und View Post
    a little coup d'etat for the nation after losing an election? How... democratic.
    I'm talking about a formal impeachment process. It's right there, in the Constitution. Never read it?

  2. #52
    your better Rev. Hellh0und's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    40,036
    Thanks
    4376

    From
    NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by boontito View Post
    Thank you for confirming the gullibility of #TrumpCult.


    I don't think most people have ever doubted a difference in justice based on privilege in this country. It's always been that way. It gets better by inches over time but there's still miles to make up for.

    That being said, if there was something to really lock Hillary up over, the combination of ALL her opponents holding ALL the power right now would've made it happen already. That's just reality.



    Maybe you can answer since others refuse.


    Is it against the law to instruct an employee to remove the classified markings from a secure classified fax and send it nonsecure via email.

    yes or no?

    here is the relevant law:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798



    The idea that she didn't break the law simply because she hasn't been prosecuted is wishful thinking at best.

  3. #53
    your better Rev. Hellh0und's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    40,036
    Thanks
    4376

    From
    NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    I'm talking about a formal impeachment process. It's right there, in the Constitution. Never read it?


    For which "high Crimes and misdemeanors"?

  4. #54
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    35,132
    Thanks
    30572

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und View Post
    For which "high Crimes and misdemeanors"?
    Obstruction of justice. Intimidation of witnesses. Collusion and cooperation with a hostile foreign power. And possible perjury, if Trump ever gets around to testifying under oath.

    Haven't you been paying attention, 'Reverend'?

  5. #55
    Veteran Member cpicturetaker12's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    28,674
    Thanks
    20586

    From
    Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    https://thinkprogress.org/pence-dism...-e5e58f35eae1/

    wait, what. Who knew that potential suspects in an FBI investigation could just tell the feds to "wrap it up"? Next time a cop stops you and asks to see your drivers license just tell them to "wrap it up"... If it goes to court you can tell the judge the same thing. There shouldn't even be any courts. And anyone that's being investigated that thinks it's a "witch hunt" should be the ones to decide when enough is enough. Because , in Trump's America, there is no rule of law.
    Trump can. Just ask him. Pence can just ask him. FOX can, just ask them.

  6. #56
    your better Rev. Hellh0und's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    40,036
    Thanks
    4376

    From
    NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    Obstruction of justice. Intimidation of witnesses. Collusion and cooperation with a hostile foreign power. And possible perjury, if Trump ever gets around to testifying under oath.

    Haven't you been paying attention, 'Reverend'?



    SO you made a wish list. "big".


    keep wishing.

  7. #57
    Nuisance Factor Yeti 8 Jungle Swing Champion, YetiSports 4 - Albatross Overload Champion, YetiSports7 - Snowboard FreeRide Champion, Alu`s Revenge Champion boontito's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    95,693
    Thanks
    73609

    From
    <-- "Meme Boy"
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und View Post
    Maybe you can answer since others refuse.


    Is it against the law to instruct an employee to remove the classified markings from a secure classified fax and send it nonsecure via email.

    yes or no?

    here is the relevant law:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798



    The idea that she didn't break the law simply because she hasn't been prosecuted is wishful thinking at best.
    The idea that the party who has hounded her for over two decades, initiated six or eight hearings on her handling of Benghazi, and investigated her email server issue wouldn't lock her up if they had the chance once they collectively obtained the power to do just that is kind of ridiculous.

    I'm with you... if there's a case to be made, then by all means lock her up, lock her up, lock her up.
    Thanks from the watchman

  8. #58
    your better Rev. Hellh0und's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    40,036
    Thanks
    4376

    From
    NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by boontito View Post
    The idea that the party who has hounded her for over two decades, initiated six or eight hearings on her handling of Benghazi, and investigated her email server issue wouldn't lock her up if they had the chance once they collectively obtained the power to do just that is kind of ridiculous.

    I'm with you... if there's a case to be made, then by all means lock her up, lock her up, lock her up.


    So no answer?

    Is it against the law to instruct an employee to remove the classified markings from a secure classified fax and send it nonsecure via email.

    yes or no?

    here is the relevant law:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798

  9. #59
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    82,037
    Thanks
    44699

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    Obstruction of justice. Intimidation of witnesses. Collusion and cooperation with a hostile foreign power. And possible perjury, if Trump ever gets around to testifying under oath.

    Haven't you been paying attention, 'Reverend'?
    not to mention destabilizing the ME to divert attention from it all.

  10. #60
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    82,037
    Thanks
    44699

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by MaryAnne View Post
    Spiro Agnew Used the very same words Pence used. They showed it on Scarborough this morning.
    Freudian slip by Pence...or wishful thinking?

Page 6 of 18 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 8th August 2017, 08:11 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18th July 2017, 06:59 PM
  3. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 13th June 2017, 08:13 PM
  4. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 17th December 2016, 09:30 AM
  5. Replies: 281
    Last Post: 13th November 2016, 12:34 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed