Members banned from this thread: sweettee


Page 43 of 44 FirstFirst ... 3341424344 LastLast
Results 421 to 430 of 437
Thanks Tree196Thanks

Thread: The feds lost yes, lost 1,475 migrant children

  1. #421
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12,055
    Thanks
    6193

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by excalibur View Post
    Not really, the 'birthright citizenship' ruling by SCOTUS will not stop women from running across the border and popping out the child, allowing them both to stay. Then the crying Schumer's (in both parties) will wail about uniting the families so the father (if known) and then other relatives can come in through chain migration. These people fill the welfare rolls.
    The "anchor baby" myth does die hard.

    This is the definition that has little legal underpinning. For illegal immigrant parents, being the parent of a U.S. citizen child almost never forms the core of a successful defense in an immigration court. In short, if the undocumented parent of a U.S.-born child is caught in the United States, he or she legally faces the very same risk of deportation as any other immigrant.
    source

  2. #422
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12,055
    Thanks
    6193

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by THOR View Post
    How many people coming in will be enough for you? We already have generous immigration, chain migration.
    Yes, chain migration. For example, Melania Knavs was able to bring her parents here after she came on a "genius visa."

  3. #423
    your better Rev. Hellh0und's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    39,942
    Thanks
    4333

    From
    NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by excalibur View Post
    Not really, the 'birthright citizenship' ruling by SCOTUS will not stop women from running across the border and popping out the child, allowing them both to stay. Then the crying Schumer's (in both parties) will wail about uniting the families so the father (if known) and then other relatives can come in through chain migration. These people fill the welfare rolls.



    This too needs to be changed.
    Thanks from orangecat

  4. #424
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12,055
    Thanks
    6193

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und View Post
    This too needs to be changed.
    Except in the fevered imaginations of the self described conservatives, it does not need to change, as it never existed in the first place. See my post 421.

  5. #425
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    49,333
    Thanks
    9924

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    Yes, chain migration. For example, Melania Knavs was able to bring her parents here after she came on a "genius visa."
    Perhaps if Melania came in illegally, had a DWI and a few drug convictions she would be a worthy immigrant to you and your ilk.

  6. #426
    your better Rev. Hellh0und's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    39,942
    Thanks
    4333

    From
    NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    Except in the fevered imaginations of the self described conservatives, it does not need to change, as it never existed in the first place. See my post 421.


    well that's an argument for SCOTUS due to the 14th amendment. which to change this would need a constitutional convention.

  7. #427
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12,055
    Thanks
    6193

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by Goofball View Post
    Perhaps if Melania came in illegally, had a DWI and a few drug convictions she would be a worthy immigrant to you and your ilk.
    You never fail to live up to your name

  8. #428
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12,055
    Thanks
    6193

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und View Post
    well that's an argument for SCOTUS due to the 14th amendment. which to change this would need a constitutional convention.
    We do not need to change the 14th. Amendment. The "anchor baby" nonsense is just that.

  9. #429
    your better Rev. Hellh0und's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    39,942
    Thanks
    4333

    From
    NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    We do not need to change the 14th. Amendment. The "anchor baby" nonsense is just that.



    All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.


    I disagree. I think the amendment is clear and needs amending.
    Thanks from orangecat

  10. #430
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12,055
    Thanks
    6193

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by Rev. Hellh0und View Post
    All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.


    I disagree. I think the amendment is clear and needs amending.
    The amendment is quite clear, and needs no amending.

    The anchor baby myth is just that, a myth.

Page 43 of 44 FirstFirst ... 3341424344 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. she lost, get over it.
    By the watchman in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 18th December 2017, 05:49 AM
  2. NPR is lost to the right
    By zitiboy in forum Current Events
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 1st October 2011, 07:08 AM
  3. War Is Not Lost....Unless
    By Migi e! in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 5th May 2007, 02:44 AM
  4. We lost
    By Inkslinger in forum World Politics
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 13th August 2006, 09:57 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed