Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43
Thanks Tree27Thanks

Thread: Mueller motion vs Concord Management.

  1. #11
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    49,333
    Thanks
    9924

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasselas View Post
    There are a number of Russians charged in the same case. They haven't shown up. It's not possible to prosecute someone in the US en absentia, so this protective order would just prevent defendants from seeing evidence until it's actually possible to prosecute them. Mueller argues that revealing that evidence could put at risk: other defendants, national security, un-indicted co-conspirators, innocents. Seems pretty straight forward to me...and a reasonable thing to ask the court.
    Concord showed up in court to challenge Mueller. Are you saying they are deprived due process because the others have not showed up yet?

    Rookie Mueller was outsmarted, and now he is scrambling because he has no case.
    Thanks from excalibur

  2. #12
    Senior Member BoiseBo's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2013
    Posts
    10,497
    Thanks
    8385

    From
    Boise, ID
    Quote Originally Posted by Goofball View Post
    Concord showed up in court to challenge Mueller. Are you saying they are deprived due process because the others have not showed up yet?

    Rookie Mueller was outsmarted, and now he is scrambling because he has no case.
    Oh so suddenly a lifelong Republican and 40 year veteran who served under everyone from Reagan to present and the guy who rolled up John Gotti and Sammy the Bull ...

    Is a "Rookie"?

    Thanks from Friday13

  3. #13
    Senior Member NeoVsMatrix's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,514
    Thanks
    7467

    From
    NY
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasselas View Post
    There are a number of Russians charged in the same case. They haven't shown up. It's not possible to prosecute someone in the US en absentia, so this protective order would just prevent defendants from seeing evidence until it's actually possible to prosecute them. Mueller argues that revealing that evidence could put at risk: other defendants, national security, un-indicted co-conspirators, innocents. Seems pretty straight forward to me...and a reasonable thing to ask the court.
    You need to explain. It appears as if you would assume that
    - the OP actually READ the document he linked to, the motion for a protective order
    - the OP understands and gets what the actual very small and nuanced request for protection the US government is asking for
    - the OP would honestly talk about these facts, if the above were the case.
    Thanks from BDBoop, Blues63 and Friday13

  4. #14
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    49,333
    Thanks
    9924

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by NeoVsMatrix View Post
    You need to explain. It appears as if you would assume that
    - the OP actually READ the document he linked to, the motion for a protective order
    - the OP understands and gets what the actual very small and nuanced request for protection the US government is asking for
    - the OP would honestly talk about these facts, if the above were the case.
    Once again you bring nothing.

  5. #15
    Under Protest excalibur's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    10,907
    Thanks
    3470

    From
    The Milky Way
    Quote Originally Posted by BoiseBo View Post
    Oh so suddenly a lifelong Republican and 40 year veteran who served under everyone from Reagan to present and the guy who rolled up John Gotti and Sammy the Bull ...

    Is a "Rookie"?



    Try actually reading up on Robert 'Anthrax' Mueller.

    Mueller Presided Over the Anthrax Frame-Up

    Silverglate: How Robert Mueller Tried To Entrap Me

    Mueller’s ‘Pit Bull’ Andrew Weissmann Busted for Withholding Evidence in Previous Cas

    Conflict of Interest? Mueller's FBI Has a History With Russian Oligarch Oleg Deripask

  6. #16
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    64,915
    Thanks
    36471

    From
    in my head
    Seems like all those links confirm Mueller's length of experience. "Rookie" means "only recently turned professional." You're attacking your own case with these links.
    Thanks from Dragonfly5, Friday13 and BoiseBo

  7. #17
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    49,333
    Thanks
    9924

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasselas View Post
    Seems like all those links confirm Mueller's length of experience. "Rookie" means "only recently turned professional." You're attacking your own case with these links.
    He did not call him a rookie.

    Leaern to read.
    Thanks from excalibur

  8. #18
    DEEP STATE CEO Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    9,366
    Thanks
    6789

    From
    SPECTRE HQ
    Quote Originally Posted by Goofball View Post
    He did not call him a rookie.

    Leaern to read.
    Learn to spell.
    Thanks from BoiseBo

  9. #19
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    49,333
    Thanks
    9924

    From
    United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Blues63 View Post
    Learn to spell.
    Got anything worthwhile? Oh wait, never mind.

  10. #20
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    64,915
    Thanks
    36471

    From
    in my head
    Quote Originally Posted by Goofball View Post
    He did not call him a rookie.

    Leaern to read.
    According to BB's quote of you in #12 you did.

    Caught. (Or. are you going to report him for changing your quote?)

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 53
    Last Post: 17th February 2018, 11:14 AM
  2. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 3rd February 2018, 11:16 AM
  3. GOP plan set into motion
    By USA-1 in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 28th December 2010, 05:08 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed