Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 59
Thanks Tree33Thanks

Thread: The Social Media Unemployment Line

  1. #31
    Established Member Spider Solitare One Suit Champion, Color Boxes Champion
    Joined
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    6,685
    Thanks
    7020

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Dad View Post
    Smokers are not a protected class. H Ross Perot never hired smokers at EDS. Think about it, why would you want to hire someone that has such a filthy habit? Someone that makes such poor decisions with their own life? And now, since the ACA imposes a surcharge upon smokers it is easy to determine who smokes.
    All it would take for any reasonable employer to kick your ass to the curb would be a few minutes looking at your posts here on PH. Your filthy habits of abusing the welfare system and putting down those who apply for welfare benefits speak VOLUMES about your character (or lack thereof).


  2. #32
    Veteran Member Southern Dad's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    26,206
    Thanks
    5779

    From
    Walking the Fine Line
    Quote Originally Posted by Steam Heat View Post
    All it would take for any reasonable employer to kick your ass to the curb would be a few minutes looking at your posts here on PH. Your filthy habits of abusing the welfare system and putting down those who apply for welfare benefits speak VOLUMES about your character (or lack thereof).
    At my level it costs more to fire me, than to just wait out my retirement. It may not be a golden parachute but it's at least a bronze. Another funny thing is that you assume that the board of directors who are all hardworking individuals like welfare.

  3. #33
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    13,227
    Thanks
    3544

    From
    AK
    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Dad View Post
    At my level it costs more to fire me, than to just wait out my retirement. It may not be a golden parachute but it's at least a bronze. Another funny thing is that you assume that the board of directors who are all hardworking individuals like welfare.
    I have some experience with these parachute provisions encouraging bad leadership. My opinion. It's one thing to help smooth the risks of moving around to different leadership positions, and another to load the severance incentives so heavily that leaders want to get fired. When that's the case, the only ones who benefit are bad leaders.

  4. #34
    Veteran Member Dr.Knuckles's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    96,194
    Thanks
    2308

    From
    Vancouver
    So... what about if I post on social media under an assumed name?

    Serious question.

    Can my employer hold 'Dr. Gently' (Or his fantasy hockey champion alias, or his kid's youtube account) to the same standards as... me?

    That's the reason I don't use my real name online. Because I like my job.
    Thanks from Kontrary

  5. #35
    Veteran Member Southern Dad's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    26,206
    Thanks
    5779

    From
    Walking the Fine Line
    Quote Originally Posted by Neomalthusian View Post
    I have some experience with these parachute provisions encouraging bad leadership. My opinion. It's one thing to help smooth the risks of moving around to different leadership positions, and another to load the severance incentives so heavily that leaders want to get fired. When that's the case, the only ones who benefit are bad leaders.
    Yes, that can happen. I'm sure you aren't making any guesses about my leadership abilities or motivation because I'll tell you now, I'm pretty damn good at what I do. Are there times that I have to make hard decisions? You bet, it comes with the job. Steam Heat was throwing out his reasons why an employer wouldn't be happy with my positions here at Political Hotwire. Things like how I feel about freeloaders. That's no secret. I'm pretty sure anyone who has known me more than a few months knows that. I am quick to reward hard work and going beyond expectations. I'm not one that believes last place gets a trophy.

    His remark was in response to a comment about smokers that I posted. Does anyone here think that smokers are smart people who make good decisions? The side of the package basically warns you this crap may kill you. The cost alone should be a deterrent. Yet, people continue to light up. Now, even Obamacare slaps a surcharge on those that smoke and it's to a small hit. People who are addicted to cigarettes are weak. These are simply facts. Just as is the fact that H Ross Perot never hired smokers when he owned and ran EDS. That was in the 70's.

  6. #36
    Veteran Member Southern Dad's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    26,206
    Thanks
    5779

    From
    Walking the Fine Line
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Gently View Post
    So... what about if I post on social media under an assumed name?

    Serious question.

    Can my employer hold 'Dr. Gently' (Or his fantasy hockey champion alias, or his kid's youtube account) to the same standards as... me?

    That's the reason I don't use my real name online. Because I like my job.
    I think as long as you keep your social media presence and your work presence separate, you shouldn't have a problem. I believe the issue comes in when someone has a Facebook and they fill out all the boxes, including employer. Many Twitter accounts that I follow have text that says that the opinions are their own and not the employer.

  7. #37
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    13,227
    Thanks
    3544

    From
    AK
    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Dad View Post
    Yes, that can happen. I'm sure you aren't making any guesses about my leadership abilities or motivation because I'll tell you now, I'm pretty damn good at what I do.
    Haha, no I'm not speaking about it you personally.

    But why SHOULD it be more expensive to fire you than let you stay put? A really good leader that's really confident in his/her leadership abilities and qualities should see no need to set up generous parachute provisions. I mean fairly generous moving expense provisions ($5-$10k) and 1-3 months' pay, reasonable. Millions and millions, with the looming threat of "wrongful termination" lawsuits waged by executive nomads who do this to every small-to-medium enterprise they can schmooze into hiring them? No thanks. I have met smooth operators, wheelers and dealers, straight up narcissist douchebags that are straight up destroyers of organizations. Generous golden parachute provisions signal weakness and corruption.

  8. #38
    Veteran Member Southern Dad's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    26,206
    Thanks
    5779

    From
    Walking the Fine Line
    Quote Originally Posted by Neomalthusian View Post
    Haha, no I'm not speaking about it you personally.

    But why SHOULD it be more expensive to fire you than let you stay put? A really good leader that's really confident in his/her leadership abilities and qualities should see no need to set up generous parachute provisions. I mean fairly generous moving expense provisions ($5-$10k) and 1-3 months' pay, reasonable. Millions and millions, with the looming threat of "wrongful termination" lawsuits waged by executive nomads who do this to every small-to-medium enterprise they can schmooze into hiring them? No thanks. I have met smooth operators, wheelers and dealers, straight up narcissist douchebags that are straight up destroyers of organizations. Generous golden parachute provisions signal weakness and corruption.
    Things change when you invest in the company.

  9. #39
    Throbbing Member Missle Command Champion johnflesh's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    17,944
    Thanks
    8067

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by Neomalthusian View Post
    Believing an employer should be free to decide whether or not they want to continue employing someone after they post something publicly is not the same as believing employers should control anything a person does while not on the job.
    The control comes from the probability that action will be taken - and that fact alone is being argued. And with a whole thread of examples, it's common sense to common sense folks that action will be taken. Where there is a threat of action, there is control.

  10. #40
    Throbbing Member Missle Command Champion johnflesh's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    17,944
    Thanks
    8067

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Dad View Post
    Things change when you invest in the company.
    Yep, you think you're unfireable. Best delusion ever.
    Thanks from Steam Heat and BDBoop

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Social Media in Law Enforcement
    By Southern Dad in forum Current Events
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 29th July 2015, 05:22 PM
  2. Social Media:
    By BruceTLaney in forum Current Events
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12th November 2014, 11:24 AM
  3. Social media spanks Ann Coulter
    By Davocrat in forum Current Events
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 14th May 2014, 02:06 PM
  4. Media and the Social Security Debate
    By Babba in forum Journalism
    Replies: 260
    Last Post: 24th April 2012, 02:47 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed