
Originally Posted by
galatin
The level of wages in the US for some categories of workers puzzles me...... If people when working have salaries which do not cover the minimum necessary to cover their basic needs, is it worth accepting that companies which hired them remain in activity, because if anyway these people need social benefits to survive, it is indirectly the tax payer who subsidizes these company but for which prospects or future ? Better train workers for other jobs which offer real opportunities and least give an opportunity to people to be paid normally and be independant of social benefits....