Thread: $10 Minimum Wage Would Push More Than Half Of Working Poor Out Of Poverty

Originally Posted by Shanty

You lead in it. Aethelfrith merely cleans up after your intellectual shitting on the living room floor.

We all know that. You just deny it when it doesn't fit into your myopic view of the world.

when did you refer to any relevant data?

You linked to a long debunked paper, was shown how it was debunked, and then you proceeded to continue using the fallacy.

That's a lie. Neumark and Wacher were never debunked. Look at you. You have to post blatant lies to keep in the conversation now.

Originally Posted by Raoul_Duke

"Has the potential?" LOL! You guys are always selling some "potential" or "expected" economic snake oil. It smacks of "central planning" to me. Not sure where your "real world" examples are of that working very well as I'm not aware of any. But as long as you are running contrived data through a big government biased model, I'm sure you can "find" whatever "potential" utopian labor market "outcomes" you can dream up in your Marxist mind. Good job comrade!

And then when that "expected outcome" doesn't happen, they'll cook up a study that is completely incompatible with real world numbers as proof that it did.

Originally Posted by Shanty

Real world data keeps kicking you where your balls would be if you had any. It's the facts that keep you guys desperately trying to convince people of your narrative of ideology over the real world.

Just out of curiousity, when is the last time you cited actual evidence instead of just claiming that you did?

Originally Posted by Shanty

How's the US economy doing under GOP obstruction?

Oops...

Buck passing at its finest.

Originally Posted by Æthelfrith

No. I merely have to assume that firms have wage making power. That is automatically delivered through 'imperfect competition'

The employees share wage making power through their consent to work for said wage.

Originally Posted by Macduff

That's a lie. Neumark and Wacher were never debunked. Look at you. You have to post blatant lies to keep in the conversation now.

Alinski has taught legions of drones that one of the most effective ways to hide an agenda is to redefine the established meaning of words. Shanty is an excellent example of such tomfoolery.

Originally Posted by BDBoop

House Republicans Are on the Hook for Killing 1.6 Million Jobs

You know that the president was responsible for sequestration, right?
Who provided the numbers for the CBO report that article is writing about? Was it the White House? Because they've been caught lying about the sequester many times. But this is typical. This president's economic policy is a failure. The liberals can't claim results so they try to blame someone else.

Originally Posted by Macduff

You know that the president was responsible for sequestration, right?
Who provided the numbers for the CBO report that article is writing about? Was it the White House? Because they've been caught lying about the sequester many times. But this is typical. This president's economic policy is a failure. The liberals can't claim results so they try to blame someone else.

Yeah, just like people get killed during a robbery, which wouldn't have happened had they just handed over the money.

Try again.

Originally Posted by Macduff

That's a lie. Neumark and Wacher were never debunked. Look at you. You have to post blatant lies to keep in the conversation now.

I'm not the one defending Wascher and Neumark. It's already been proven false on this very thread. Is there a lie you'd tell that would ever cause you to feel shame for being prolific in lying? Or is it just a matter of course and that you feel like if you lie enough, you can rewrite the truth?