Page 5 of 18 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 173
Thanks Tree117Thanks

Thread: About time

  1. #41
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    8

    From
    Where i am
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    Really? What law and/or policy was not enforced?
    Ever heard of the Baker act? He expressed his desire to hurt others and was clearly a nutjob. Had he been Baker acted (like he clearly should have) he would not of been able to buy (or continue owning) arms.

  2. #42
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    8

    From
    Where i am
    Quote Originally Posted by carpe diem View Post
    I find your sexist attitude alarming and offensive.
    I am not the only one that jumped off the page at!

  3. #43
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    8

    From
    Where i am
    Quote Originally Posted by namvet69 View Post
    Here's some logic. Ban weapons that are magazine fed. Make penalties for having one severe. This at least gives the attackees a chance to get away during reload. But that's too much for righties to wrap their heads around.
    Lets just go back to smoothbore muskets, right? What about those evil revolvers?

  4. #44
    Shiny Purple Member namvet69's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    4,701
    Thanks
    4909

    From
    Englewood, Fl
    Quote Originally Posted by Joey Nobody View Post
    Lets just go back to smoothbore muskets, right? What about those evil revolvers?
    Do you have to be an ass with every post? I'm trying to have a discussion about serious stuff. I was talking about Magazine fed weapons and how they set down a continuous field of fire and how eliminating them would at least begin to go in the right direction.

    Those young people didn't have a stolen moment with which to flee. Had the nutjob needed to stop to reload, it would have provided an opportunity for some of those young people to get away. I don't see how that would have inconvenienced anyone. We're talking about lives here. What problem do you have with that? Just curious.
    Thanks from Dangermouse

  5. #45
    Senior Member libertariat720's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    8,130
    Thanks
    2620

    From
    ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Joey Nobody View Post
    Ever heard of the Baker act? He expressed his desire to hurt others and was clearly a nutjob. Had he been Baker acted (like he clearly should have) he would not of been able to buy (or continue owning) arms.
    Yes, I have, and I don't believe that would have prevented him from buying a gun in the future. It would just have let the police put handcuffs on him and put him in the psych ward for 72 hours.

    I really don't think that people who want to take the access of guns away from "mentally ill" people are really thinking this through. Where exactly is the legal precedent if no law had actually been violated?

  6. #46
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    8

    From
    Where i am
    Quote Originally Posted by libertariat720 View Post
    Yes, I have, and I don't believe that would have prevented him from buying a gun in the future. It would just have let the police put handcuffs on him and put him in the psych ward for 72 hours.

    I really don't think that people who want to take the access of guns away from "mentally ill" people are really thinking this through. Where exactly is the legal precedent if no law had actually been violated?
    There are three classes of "prohibited person" If you are baker acted, you are a prohibited person.

  7. #47
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    8

    From
    Where i am
    Quote Originally Posted by namvet69 View Post
    Do you have to be an ass with every post? I'm trying to have a discussion about serious stuff. I was talking about Magazine fed weapons and how they set down a continuous field of fire and how eliminating them would at least begin to go in the right direction.

    Those young people didn't have a stolen moment with which to flee. Had the nutjob needed to stop to reload, it would have provided an opportunity for some of those young people to get away. I don't see how that would have inconvenienced anyone. We're talking about lives here. What problem do you have with that? Just curious.
    "ass"? This guy had to reload. Tell us, what guns do you think people should be "allowed" (a right is not a government "allowance")

  8. #48
    Veteran Member MaryAnne's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    50,743
    Thanks
    36273

    From
    Englewood,Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Joey Nobody View Post
    Liberals buy the MSM narrative that successful defensive gun use does not exist. Keep drinking the blue kool aide.
    Another ignore. Donít you guys get tired of your lying posts?
    Thanks from Dangermouse

  9. #49
    Dick with my Buzz...Try DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    37,079
    Thanks
    32032

    From
    SWUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by Joey Nobody View Post
    Liberals buy the MSM narrative that successful defensive gun use does not exist. Keep drinking the blue kool aide.
    What is laughable is that you do not have any evidence

    A] the sign has prevented anyone from shooting up the school

    B] that someone will not still shoot up the school


    Why would the MSM give a fuck that someone believes that a sign = positive result. Do you know how many Gun Free Zones signs are up at schools that have never had a mass or any other type of shooting?

  10. #50
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    4,700
    Thanks
    4787

    From
    U.S.A.
    Quote Originally Posted by Joey Nobody View Post
    Liberals buy the MSM narrative that successful defensive gun use does not exist. Keep drinking the blue kool aide.
    ^ lol ^
    Centrist don't get their news from 'The Blaze'.
    Thanks from Babba and Dangermouse

Page 5 of 18 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 23rd May 2017, 05:43 PM
  2. Time change sucks! - End Daylight Savings Time!
    By meridian5455 in forum Current Events
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 31st March 2014, 04:45 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10th July 2013, 02:13 AM
  4. Time to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic ONE MORE TIME!
    By Cicero in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 27th January 2011, 12:05 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed