Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
Thanks Tree11Thanks

Thread: Fox News Stopped Airing This Trump Impeachment Ad

  1. #21
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    76,087
    Thanks
    39171

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Right because asking if it was a specific ad from that same group with the description is too much to ask...

    Now that I was back on WiFi and had the chance, no, it's not the flagrantly racist ad the group put out as the previous... it's OK though, people would defend even the most vile things if it's against trump / supporter.
    it's up to you to research it if you want to know if it's from the same group. A task made particularly easy considering you were provided enough information to do just that in the one link. The man tells you who he is in the ad. He tells you he's the one that's funding it. There's no reason to question whether he's involved in Virginia politics. Which is where the ad you're referring to was shown. But again, why is it we're 20 comments in and you still haven't bothered to look up your issues yourself? It has nothing what so ever to do with this thread. And you're the only one who wants to know.

  2. #22
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    13,876
    Thanks
    2299

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    it's up to you to research it if you want to know if it's from the same group. A task made particularly easy considering you were provided enough information to do just that in the one link. The man tells you who he is in the ad. He tells you he's the one that's funding it. There's no reason to question whether he's involved in Virginia politics. Which is where the ad you're referring to was shown. But again, why is it we're 20 comments in and you still haven't bothered to look up your issues yourself? It has nothing what so ever to do with this thread. And you're the only one who wants to know.
    I know, it's up to me to research my claims, your claims... everyone's claims...

  3. #23
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    76,087
    Thanks
    39171

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    I know, it's up to me to research my claims, your claims... everyone's claims...
    when have you ever even researched your own?

  4. #24
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    13,876
    Thanks
    2299

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    when have you ever even researched your own?
    Have you looked deeper than your first link into the group you are supporting?

    Nah, that shit doesn't matter, as long as it is anti-trump it is good enough for you, right?

  5. #25
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    76,087
    Thanks
    39171

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Have you looked deeper than your first link into the group you are supporting?

    Nah, that shit doesn't matter, as long as it is anti-trump it is good enough for you, right?
    you're just making it worse for yourself. I'm not supporting any group. If you read the thread I've criticized the ad. I've supported nothing on this thread.

  6. #26
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    13,876
    Thanks
    2299

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    you're just making it worse for yourself. I'm not supporting any group. If you read the thread I've criticized the ad. I've supported nothing on this thread.
    Holy shit, your op you highlighted the section about fox violating first amendment... Obviously as a bad thing.

    Why bother lying this flagrantly? It's not like a 50 page thread...

  7. #27
    the "good" prag pragmatic's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    28,603
    Thanks
    17304

    From
    between Moon and NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    Less than three weeks ago, California billionaire and political activist Tom Steyer started a campaign to impeach President Trump, running ads in all 50 states.

    The video ran on a wide range of networks, including Fox News. But by Saturday, Steyer sent an email to those who had signed the petition, saying that Fox pulled the ad off the air “without warning.”

    Steyer called the move a violation of his First Amendment rights, accusing Fox of seeking to appease Trump, its “#1 fan.” Fox didn’t announce its decision until Monday, at which time Fox News co-president Jack Abernethy justified the move by saying that “due to the strong negative reaction to their ad by our viewers, we could not in good conscience take their money.”Fox News Pulls Tom Steyer's Trump Impeachment Ad

    Sounds like Steyer is among those who really don't understand the 1st Amendment.

    Sort of embarrassing for him. Should have one of his staffers research that for him....

  8. #28
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    76,087
    Thanks
    39171

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Holy shit, your op you highlighted the section about fox violating first amendment... Obviously as a bad thing.

    Why bother lying this flagrantly? It's not like a 50 page thread...
    how many lights do you see?


  9. #29
    Veteran Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    13,876
    Thanks
    2299

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    how many lights do you see?

    Changing the subject rather than tell me I was wrong... Thanks for conceding that you were lying.

  10. #30
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    76,087
    Thanks
    39171

    From
    becoming more and more
    Quote Originally Posted by pragmatic View Post
    Sounds like Steyer is among those who really don't understand the 1st Amendment.

    Sort of embarrassing for him. Should have one of his staffers research that for him....
    yep. If anything it would be a violation of contract issues. Even then he doesn't really have a leg to stand on. The first amendment claim is as silly as his impeachment ad. Now, if he were a candidate running for office, that's different.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15th October 2016, 12:44 PM
  2. Trump stopped the bleeding...So Hillary won the debate
    By Devil505 in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 10th October 2016, 12:54 PM
  3. Can Donald Trump be stopped?
    By the watchman in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: 11th January 2016, 01:50 PM
  4. Can Donald Trump Be Stopped?--
    By GordonGecko in forum Current Events
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 4th December 2015, 08:32 PM
  5. Piyush: Trump 'a madman who must be stopped'
    By Friday13 in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 16th September 2015, 08:26 AM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed