Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28
Thanks Tree39Thanks

Thread: What Next For Prosecutor Disbarred For Sending Innocent Man To Death Row?

  1. #1
    Veteran Member Madeline's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    56,212
    Thanks
    32247

    From
    Cleveland, Ohio

    What Next For Prosecutor Disbarred For Sending Innocent Man To Death Row?



    A Texas legal disciplinary board upheld a decision to disbar a prosecutor who oversaw a case that sent an innocent man to death row.

    The board on Monday affirmed an earlier decision that found Charles Sebesta extracted false confessions and withheld testimony to convict Anthony Graves, who spent 18 years in prison before he was exonerated.

    The Texas supreme court-appointed board of disciplinary appeals said Sebesta’s behavior in the case was “egregious”.

    *Snip*

    There was no physical evidence linking Graves to the murders [by arson]. The prosecutor’s case instead relied on a string of prosecutorial misdeeds. Sebesta presented false testimony in the case and withheld information from the defense.

    Sebesta had convicted another man, Robert Carter, for setting the fire. Sebesta pushed Carter to say Graves was an accomplice, though Carter told Sebesta he acted alone a day before he testified.

    “Sebesta never disclosed this information to the defense,” the disciplinary board said.

    Sebesta also lied about one of the defense attorney’s alibi witnesses. Sebesta said the witness was a murder suspect and could be indicted, which was not true, but the witness refused to testify.

    *Snip*

    Sebesta told Reuters that he was being targeted by state bar attorneys and that Graves was rightfully convicted. “My opinion is that we presented the evidence we had and felt like it was sufficient,” Sebesta said.

    The Texas state bar revoked Sebesta’s attorney’s license in June because he had engaged in prosecutorial misconduct in the case. Sebesta appealed against the ruling but the Monday decision finalizes his disbarment.

    At least 4.1% of people sentenced to death in the US since the 1970s are innocent, according to a study published in April 2014.
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...P=share_btn_tw

    I think it is impossible to read the facts of the above case and not conclude, this prosecutor is guilty of attempted first degree murder.

    What say you? Should he be prosecuted for trying to have the state kill a man he knew was not guilty?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Loki's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,190
    Thanks
    3842

    From
    East coast USA
    If life was fair he would be given a choice- serve the same amount of time or pay 60, 000 for every year victim was locked up to victum.
    Thanks from Tedminator, cable2 and Friday13

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Micro Machines Champion, Race Against Time Champion Tedminator's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    24,514
    Thanks
    14466

    From
    South Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    If life was fair he would be given a choice- serve the same amount of time or pay 60, 000 for every year victim was locked up to victum.
    That sounds reasonable.


    Oh and disbar Sebasta.
    Thanks from cable2

  4. #4
    Bizarroland Observer Thx1138's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    22,706
    Thanks
    13777

    From
    aMEEErica
    Well I don't know... if a cop can choke someone for suspected "selling loosies" (with other cops standing around watching) and get away with it...

    Wouldn't administrative leave be enough? Plus the humiliation of being a thread topic at PH?

    After all, we're talking about Texas here!

    Thx

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Madeline's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    56,212
    Thanks
    32247

    From
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    If life was fair he would be given a choice- serve the same amount of time or pay 60, 000 for every year victim was locked up to victum.
    Why? We never allow anyone to "buy" their way out of prison in any other crimes or fact patterns. What would justify doing that here?

    As for the time his victim served, that is relevant but the law dictates a penalty for attempted 1st degree. He should get what is coming to him, IMO.
    Thanks from cable2 and Friday13

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Madeline's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    56,212
    Thanks
    32247

    From
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Tedminator View Post
    That sounds reasonable.


    Oh and disbar Sebasta.
    He has been disbarred, Ted.

    The facts make it clear, he's guilty of the crime -- and he has been through a trial, a state bar association process and an appeal court proceeding, litigating his disbarment. IOW, the facts are not in dispute.
    Thanks from Tedminator, cable2 and Friday13

  7. #7
    Veteran Member Micro Machines Champion, Race Against Time Champion Tedminator's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    24,514
    Thanks
    14466

    From
    South Florida
    Oh. Ok. Yes! Of course I'm paying attention.
    Thanks from Madeline

  8. #8
    Veteran Member Madeline's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    56,212
    Thanks
    32247

    From
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Thx1138 View Post
    Well I don't know... if a cop can choke someone for suspected "selling loosies" (with other cops standing around watching) and get away with it...

    Wouldn't administrative leave be enough? Plus the humiliation of being a thread topic at PH?

    After all, we're talking about Texas here!

    Thx
    You joke, but the fact is I don't believe this -- disbarring a DA for knowingly convicting the wrong person -- has ever happened in the US before. (I could be wrong......but I don't think so......)

    There's been a whole lot of this, especially in DP cases, and most victims were helpless. Not just poor, black and despised, but most times also severely mentally disabled.
    Thanks from cable2

  9. #9
    Veteran Member Madeline's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    56,212
    Thanks
    32247

    From
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Tedminator View Post
    Oh. Ok. Yes! Of course I'm paying attention.
    Wakie, wakie, eggs and bakie......♫
    Thanks from Tedminator

  10. #10
    Bizarroland Observer Thx1138's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    22,706
    Thanks
    13777

    From
    aMEEErica
    Quote Originally Posted by Madeline View Post
    You joke, but the fact is I don't believe this -- disbarring a DA for knowingly convicting the wrong person -- has ever happened in the US before. (I could be wrong......but I don't think so......)

    There's been a whole lot of this, especially in DP cases, and most victims were helpless. Not just poor, black and despised, but most times also severely mentally disabled.
    Yes, I mock the whole system, especially in Texas.

    Absolutely, he should be prosecuted and sent to jail.

    I am a "law and order" democrat and believe in "deterrent" style sentencing for many cases: "Don't let this happen to you!"

    Thx
    Thanks from Madeline, cable2 and Friday13

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 10th February 2016, 12:02 PM
  2. Replies: 116
    Last Post: 25th October 2015, 10:46 AM
  3. Replies: 62
    Last Post: 14th June 2015, 01:25 AM
  4. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 1st April 2011, 05:59 PM
  5. D.A. Nifong DISBARRED
    By Migi e! in forum Current Events
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 27th June 2007, 11:00 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed