View Poll Results: Should HR5824 be made law ?

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    2 20.00%
  • No

    8 80.00%
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 51
Thanks Tree45Thanks

Thread: Should HR5824 Be Made Law ?

  1. #31
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,379
    Thanks
    318

    From
    Yesod

    Signaling Strides Stemming Tides

    " Signaling Strides Stemming Tides "

    * Eyes Cross Spring *

    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    " Agonists Inviting More Trouble Calling It Equitable "
    * Extending Membership Conditioned On Common Creed *
    Are those marchers amassing as a growing population with elevated birth rates and at some percentage of the 1.2 million permanent immigrants to the US alone each year ?
    Yes.
    Are any divisions of earth planet supposed as reservations for distinct ethnic identities including common phenotype from haploid clad along with commemorated traditions of cultural motifs and applied genres ?

    Those incessantly breeding apply a purposeful objective with a single criteria of natural success that is to perpetuate a capability to affirm a strong anthropic principle .

    Those sophisticated physical states are concomitant with sentience and sapience and concomitant with gamete haploids of procreation .

    Those aims of occupation may be regimental for some groups and especially in those sheltering female awareness of options .

    How are global demographic distributions consistent or non consistent with reasonable expectations for numerical representations and insulated ethnic identities ?


    * Assuring Cautionary Trails *

    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    In general , are those marchers growing in political and social affluence backed by a massive propaganda campaign for their acceptance ?
    That's still a matter of public debate, but there's a lot of evidence that they are reaching a wider audience lately.
    In a heterogeneous sample space of binomial pairing of maternal and paternal codons , an applied bias of discrimination in choosing a mate affects a numerical incidence of genotype and phenotype representation and political representation extensively .

    It should be clear that a contrast between nomian versus antinomian legal systems begins with a contrast between deontological versus consequentialism ethics .

    There are premises for non aggression principles and antinomianism that should be standardized .


    * Characterization Missed Motivation *

    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    Or are those marchers generally shunned and rebuked as hostile to individual liberty ?
    Somehow it has been overlooked that governments of fictional ishmaelism i slam are designed and elected by its peoples who are only fleeing to escape the conflicts and who believe that their caustic beliefs provide valid standards for public policy rather than generally causing social afflictions for themselves and for others .
    Those two aren't mutually exclusive. If you take away the right of people speak in public, you also take away the right of the people to respond to them.
    Some ideals may hold greater regard for separatism than for promoting communication that opens themselves or ideology to criticism and simply abdicate such concerns to the voting boot - Which Moderate Mussel Men Aspect Imply Moderation Inn High Degree Moderation ? .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjoining_good_and_forbidding_wrong

    A standard medieval interpretation of this Hadith is, as Al-Nawawi had explained, that such passages of scripture had to be interpreted in accordance with established Shariah principles, such as the state's sole prerogative in declaring jihad. 'Changing the reprehensible by hand,' or by compulsion, was the purview of the state alone. 'Changing with the tongue' was the right of the ulama. Ordinary, individual Muslims should only reject the reprehensible with their hearts.[3][4]
    Numbers translate into votes that translate into political policy and representative democracy remains tyranny buy and by majority wherever non aggression principles are violated .

    Violation of non aggression principles includes making credible threats of illegitimate violence against self ownership or self determination of other individuals , which may be presumed implicitly from evidence promoting such directives , whence - Should the Qurayn be Classified as Hate Speech ? ?


    * Justifiably Chastening Fictional Ishmaelism I Slam Identity *


    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    It's illegal for any government to foment a political insurrection within the United States, but that isn't what the law is about. The law is about whether the US should enforce the draconian and backwards anti-free speech and anti-freedom of religion laws on behalf of foreign dictators against their citizens when they are out of the reach of the dictator.
    A free society may likely be more effective in reverting sectarian contempt by assuring that the numerical representation of its voters remains solvent in a constitution of civil agreements that is consistent with non aggression principles .

    As numbers translate into votes that translate into public policy , in a representative democracy , temporary cultural exchange of sojourners is more prudent for dealing with ideologues vying for separatism and violations of non aggression principles .


    * Unnecessary Advocacy *
    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    The law is about foreign nationals who live in countries without freedom of religion or association or speech, and that, as punishment for being such slaves (either willingly or not) we should perpetuate that cruelty on them while they are visiting.
    Oh , now , that is motivating , since education may be highly persuasive , although one must be able to compel effective content worth learning and make credible challenges that will be respected and adopted .
    Last edited by Monk-Eye; 12th January 2017 at 04:02 AM.

  2. #32
    Anarquistador StanStill's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    7,849
    Thanks
    7649

    From
    Home
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    " Signaling Strides Stemming Tides "

    * Eyes Cross Spring *

    Are any divisions of earth planet supposed as reservations for distinct ethnic identities including common phenotype from haploid clad along with commemorated traditions of cultural motifs and applied genres ?


    Those incessantly breeding apply a purposeful objective with a single criteria of natural success that is to perpetuate a capability to affirm a strong anthropic principle .

    Those sophisticated physical states are concomitant with sentience and sapience and concomitant with gamete haploids of procreation .

    Those aims of occupation may be regimental for some groups and especially in those sheltering female awareness of options .

    How are global demographic distributions consistent or non consistent with reasonable expectations for numerical representations and insulated ethnic identities ?


    * Assuring Cautionary Trails *

    In a heterogeneous sample space of binomial pairing of maternal and paternal codons , an applied bias of discrimination in choosing a mate affects a numerical incidence of genotype and phenotype representation and political representation extensively .

    It should be clear that a contrast between nomian versus antinomian legal systems begins with a contrast between deontological versus consequentialism ethics .

    There are premises for non aggression principles and antinomianism that should be standardized .

  3. #33
    Human Bean KnotaFrayed's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    11,051
    Thanks
    9145

    From
    Here
    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    I know I tease you a lot Monk-Eye, but I haven't given up on engaging you in an actual give-and-take conversational discussion wherein you read what I wrote, and reply much like you might to a person at a grocery store, or on the street when someone asks for directions. I don't know how such a conversation with you might go, but I'd like to find out. Perhaps this IS your casual conversation. If so, I think it's only because you insist on fighting your natural urge to simplify what you are saying such that someone besides yourself can understand it (that is, assuming you actually do, which I kind of doubt).

    This looks to be something you spent many hours composing—a giant vocab obstacle course which seems to be hiding what are very simple concepts—the simplest of which is that you think universal principles should be applied on a case by case basis where deserved. In effect, you don't believe in universal principles. You don't believe that everyone should have right of free speech. You believe in a litmus test to assess whether someone is "of decent stock and breeding to deserve freedom".

    You should try to think of language more like mathematics. It's pointless to say 4(1 – x) = 3(x + 1) – 2. You could if you like, but it makes a lot more sense to people to say x=3/7. You aren't really dazzling anyone but yourself with all the qurayshism and nomian this and that. That's all just fluff you are adding in to avoid having a discussion or revealing what lies beneath. You can do better.
    Some have heard the terms, "doubletalk" and "obfuscate".....Some use both to leave their audience nodding in agreement with no "f"ing idea of what they just agreed to, but they agreed to it only because they wanted to get the hell away as fast as they could from those trying to so hard to confuse and take advantage of them in their confusion. In other cases, it is gibberish, intentionally arranged to sound intelligent for the same purpose of obfuscating listeners and having them agree to anything, just so they can then move away or because they think it sounds intelligent and agree to it, still having NO "F"ing clue as to what it says because in reality, it really does not say anything.
    Thanks from StanStill

  4. #34
    Human Bean KnotaFrayed's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    11,051
    Thanks
    9145

    From
    Here
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    " Signaling Strides Stemming Tides "

    * Eyes Cross Spring *

    Are any divisions of earth planet supposed as reservations for distinct ethnic identities including common phenotype from haploid clad along with commemorated traditions of cultural motifs and applied genres ?

    Those incessantly breeding apply a purposeful objective with a single criteria of natural success that is to perpetuate a capability to affirm a strong anthropic principle .

    Those sophisticated physical states are concomitant with sentience and sapience and concomitant with gamete haploids of procreation .

    Those aims of occupation may be regimental for some groups and especially in those sheltering female awareness of options .

    How are global demographic distributions consistent or non consistent with reasonable expectations for numerical representations and insulated ethnic identities ?


    * Assuring Cautionary Trails *

    In a heterogeneous sample space of binomial pairing of maternal and paternal codons , an applied bias of discrimination in choosing a mate affects a numerical incidence of genotype and phenotype representation and political representation extensively .

    It should be clear that a contrast between nomian versus antinomian legal systems begins with a contrast between deontological versus consequentialism ethics .

    There are premises for non aggression principles and antinomianism that should be standardized .


    * Characterization Missed Motivation *



    Some ideals may hold greater regard for separatism than for promoting communication that opens themselves or ideology to criticism and simply abdicate such concerns to the voting boot - Which Moderate Mussel Men Aspect Imply Moderation Inn High Degree Moderation ? .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjoining_good_and_forbidding_wrong


    Numbers translate into votes that translate into political policy and representative democracy remains tyranny buy and by majority wherever non aggression principles are violated .

    Violation of non aggression principles includes making credible threats of illegitimate violence against self ownership or self determination of other individuals , which may be presumed implicitly from evidence promoting such directives , whence - Should the Qurayn be Classified as Hate Speech ? ?


    * Justifiably Chastening Fictional Ishmaelism I Slam Identity *


    A free society may likely be more effective in reverting sectarian contempt by assuring that the numerical representation of its voters remains solvent in a constitution of civil agreements that is consistent with non aggression principles .

    As numbers translate into votes that translate into public policy , in a representative democracy , temporary cultural exchange of sojourners is more prudent for dealing with ideologues vying for separatism and violations of non aggression principles .


    * Unnecessary Advocacy *
    Oh , now , that is motivating , since education may be highly persuasive , although one must be able to compel effective content worth learning and make credible challenges that will be respected and adopted .
    Thanks from StanStill

  5. #35
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,379
    Thanks
    318

    From
    Yesod

    Cowards Of Principle At Best

    " Cowards Of Principle At Best "

    * Inept Realism of Fictional Ishmaelism I Slam Institutional Stupidity *

    Given that kafir ( pejorative for non believers ) are relegated to a status as third class citizens , below the institutionalized believing slave , perhaps the stupid left could explain why the biggest bigots on the planet , along with their supremacist , pedantic , nomian stupidity , are not compelled to answer for their attitude , upon which they intend to act , and history , to include the greatest genocides and murder of any denomination or peoples .
    Last edited by Monk-Eye; 14th January 2017 at 07:16 AM.

  6. #36
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,379
    Thanks
    318

    From
    Yesod

    Bandwagon Drones

    " Bandwagon Drones "

    * All Things Considered *
    Quote Originally Posted by KnotaFrayed View Post
    [IMG]http://www.queness.com/resources/images/14873.jpg[IMG]
    It is well known now , from reading your replies , that you are a fictional ishmaelism i slam pundit ; and , as has been the exemplified condition , such nipping at the heels of those against issues incapable of being addressing with any intelligent reply is generally expected .
    Last edited by Monk-Eye; 14th January 2017 at 07:56 AM.

  7. #37
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,379
    Thanks
    318

    From
    Yesod

    Common Condition

    " Common Condition "

    * Playing Dumb *
    Quote Originally Posted by KnotaFrayed View Post
    Some have heard the terms, "doubletalk" and "obfuscate".....Some use both to leave their audience nodding in agreement with no "f"ing idea of what they just agreed to, but they agreed to it only because they wanted to get the hell away as fast as they could from those trying to so hard to confuse and take advantage of them in their confusion. In other cases, it is gibberish, intentionally arranged to sound intelligent for the same purpose of obfuscating listeners and having them agree to anything, just so they can then move away or because they think it sounds intelligent and agree to it, still having NO "F"ing clue as to what it says because in reality, it really does not say anything.
    If you have questions about political science , or religion , or anything stated , you are free to ask for clarification , and all here will do their best to answer and explain so that you would understand .

    Perhaps you do not want to know , as it would undermine your ability to defend yourself and to defend those with similar beliefs .

    How is the murder rate of fictional ishmaelism i slam , has any other ideology or group caught up with it yet , as it is by far the most reprehensible in history ?

    Do you wonder why fictional ishmaelism i slam should not be publicly ostracized , considering it is an institutional creed that does not deserve any respect ?

  8. #38
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,379
    Thanks
    318

    From
    Yesod

    Fair Representation Commentary

    " Fair Representation Commentary "

    * Particulars A Bout Common Place *

    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    [img]https://media2.giphy.com/media/3o7TKnvDNYADdLYZIQ/200w.gif#2[img]
    Nice finds with interesting motif and genre for this possible terrarium .

    A brahma or jainism or hanuman or ganesh or any other animated apologue is less obtrusive than a frenzied moralist aggressively pandering sun stroke delirium of literal assurances for an after life figurative from idiom conceding that an after life results from genetic continuance and sew lives within a fantasy of denial and sexual consternation .

    The luciferian paradigm is part of sin mythology , as one may observe venus traversing a crescent moon , and allusions to venus as an inferior planet relative with earth projected as a deity cast into lower heaven near hell fire of the sun and also rivaling in vanity a one and only king of gods is in allegory to the apparent brightness of venus nearing the apparent brightness of jupiter .

    The iconoclasm obsessions of mu ha mad den and crux den religions has become disconcerting for projecting an efficacy from its conjectural perspectives ( its also apply this absolution tactic ) to exact illegitimate aggression against individuals of societies founded upon social civil contracts provisioning a creed seeking enrichment for individualism - Changes Inn Public Perception For Celestial Cosmogony After Roman Conversion .

    https://books.google.com/books?id=oc...ed=0CDAQ6AEwAQ



    * Identifying Commonly Highly Specialized Legal Interests *

    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    [img]https://media.giphy.com/media/wPLR2emRsdwdy/giphy.gif[img]
    Particular questions should and can be raised from statistics from an unbiased reporting from a hue mammon zoo curator .

    In the final state of the union address , obama spoke of governance and antagonizing whites chastising to get used to browns representing more of us work force ; his temper of religion and racism brought about a balance of retort from those biased against both physical identity and political representation .

    Consider both population density and demographic data for racial identities among the disparate countries of the planet .

    Is it satisfactory for a curator of a hue mammon zoo and even for the informed consent of a public to be notified and assured that their representation of identity is equitable among those others world wide ?

    Keep in mind that chain immigration is currently an entitlement under law and who really understands what such an implication means with respect to equitable representation world wide .

    Should Hart Cellar Act Be Repealed ?

    Have a view of supposed influxes from the reference here to understand motivations for inquiries above and below :
    Where Have All The White People Gone ?
    Where Have All The White People Gone ?



    * Either Nation Of Origin Or Creed Or Both *

    Which immigrants represent a political contender to implement absolute complicity with nomian moralism codes by representative democracy and is such a movement violating non aggression principles ?

    Particular areas of individuals from those listed as india are not necessarily sufi and are they immigrants from pakistani under title of india ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deobandi

    One should philosophically be challenged with understanding motivations of i slam any thing play string calling its fates : some who are named deobandi , salafi , wahabbi , mussel men brother hood , i s la me , without buzz bee is lamb .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigr...ty_Act_of_1965
    Three Decades of Mass Immigration: The Legacy of the 1965 Immigration Act | Center for Immigration Studies



    * Seems Reason Able Seams *


    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    [img]https://media.giphy.com/media/3orieYxCHCyOS0hUwE/giphy.gif[img]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinomial_distribution
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parall..._cross_cousins
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinship#Degrees




    Who Wants A Significant Minority Or A Majority Of Fictional Ishmaelism Ideologues ?
    Which Moderate Mussel Men Aspect Imply Moderation Inn High Degree Moderation ?
    How Much Of Western Migration By I Slam Pundits Is Motivated By Conquest ?
    Last edited by Monk-Eye; 14th January 2017 at 09:17 AM.

  9. #39
    Anarquistador StanStill's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    7,849
    Thanks
    7649

    From
    Home
    Quote Originally Posted by KnotaFrayed View Post
    Some have heard the terms, "doubletalk" and "obfuscate".....Some use both to leave their audience nodding in agreement with no "f"ing idea of what they just agreed to, but they agreed to it only because they wanted to get the hell away as fast as they could from those trying to so hard to confuse and take advantage of them in their confusion. In other cases, it is gibberish, intentionally arranged to sound intelligent for the same purpose of obfuscating listeners and having them agree to anything, just so they can then move away or because they think it sounds intelligent and agree to it, still having NO "F"ing clue as to what it says because in reality, it really does not say anything.
    Dr. Fox Effect

    "The experimenters created a meaningless lecture on 'Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to Physician Education,' and coached the actor to deliver it 'with an excessive use of double talk, neologisms, non sequiturs, and contradictory statements.' At the same time, the researchers encouraged the actor to adopt a lively demeanor, convey warmth toward his audience, and intersperse his nonsensical comments with humor. ... The actor fooled not just one, but three separate audiences of professional and graduate students. Despite the emptiness of his lecture, fifty-five psychiatrists, psychologists, educators, graduate students, and other professionals produced evaluations of Dr. Fox that were overwhelmingly positive. ... The disturbing feature of the Dr. Fox study, as the experimenters noted, is that Fox’s nonverbal behaviors so completely masked a meaningless, jargon-filled, and confused presentation."


    In this case though, he seems to have convinced himself that the double-talk actually does make sense, and he has built a whole identity for himself around it. I don't think he realizes that he is duping himself every time he responds. Language is useless if you are the only one who understands it. Perhaps he prefers that way.
    Last edited by StanStill; 19th January 2017 at 05:58 PM.

  10. #40
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,379
    Thanks
    318

    From
    Yesod

    Caustic Indicators

    " Caustic Indicators "

    * Kid Gloves Off *
    Quote Originally Posted by StanStill View Post
    In this case though, he seems to have convinced himself that the double-talk actually does make sense, and he has built a whole identity for himself around it. I don't think he realizes that he is duping himself every time he responds. Language is useless if you are the only one who understands it. Perhaps he prefers that way.
    It is very simple to understand ; the qurayn would not apply outside of hejaz and any presumption that the qurayn does apply outside of hejaz is debase and termed fictional ishmaelism .

    Disappointingly , a number of poignant and technical words are being applied that you do not appear to grasp and prefer to ignore ; thus , in spite of deserving disgust for the insolence you display , you should be more insulted knowing that such pathetic demonstration of ability deserves pity .

    Further more , even if mu ham mad himself asserted a god damned lie that the qurayn applies outside of hejaz , for all i care , he and all the deluded psychotic droning sheeple pandering orwellian double speak by lauding submission to the arrogance and nomian legalism of some megalomaniac militant manifesto can shove fictional ishmaelism i slam up their fascist lofted rears as they prostrate themselves under foot and worshiping the goat of the man in front while they all beckon for a prostrate massage from baphomet .

    * Surrendering Ones Life To Acquire It *

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox
    A paradox is a statement that, despite apparently sound reasoning from true premises, leads to a self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.[1][2] A paradox involves contradictory yet interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time.[3][4][5]

    Some logical paradoxes are known to be invalid arguments but are still valuable in promoting critical thinking.[6]

    Some paradoxes have revealed errors in definitions assumed to be rigorous, and have caused axioms of mathematics and logic to be re-examined.
    * Reiterating The Same *
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    " Common Condition "
    * Playing Dumb *
    If you have questions about political science , or religion , or anything stated , you are free to ask for clarification , and all here will do their best to answer and explain so that you would understand .
    Perhaps you do not want to know , as it would undermine your ability to defend yourself and to defend those with similar beliefs .
    How is the murder rate of fictional ishmaelism i slam , has any other ideology or group caught up with it yet , as it is by far the most reprehensible in history ?
    Do you wonder why fictional ishmaelism i slam should not be publicly ostracized , considering it is an institutional creed that does not deserve any respect ?
    Last edited by Monk-Eye; 20th January 2017 at 03:00 PM.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Made in the USA!!
    By Blueneck in forum Political Humor
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 20th May 2011, 12:08 PM
  2. How could the UN be made better?
    By katiegrrl0 in forum Economics
    Replies: 127
    Last Post: 11th May 2010, 11:40 PM
  3. Made In the U.S.A..?
    By WhiteKong78 in forum Economics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29th March 2008, 08:03 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed