Irrelevant. Many citizens aren't entitled to vote.
Originally Posted by Monk-Eye
Really? This is from the OP:
Apparently , exceptions and limits to their entitlements relative with citizens do and can exist .
None are removing their wright to life , or liberty .
To “promote a religion” includes funding “religious services, religious education, evangelical outreach, and publication and dissemination of religious literature.” Should funding proceed anyway in defiance of this bill, the U.S. government can seize the monies.
So basically freedom of the press and of speech can be curtailed if you aren't deemed "suitable for freedom". How would such a law be constructed so as to avoid the limitations placed upon laws in the first amendment? In case you have forgotten it:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That could also be read as:
The removal of their property , if they should attempt to implement it to build a religious institution , would be subject to due process of law with the passage of the amendment .
"The removal of their property , if they should attempt to implement it to exercise freedom of religion and of speech , would be subject to due process of law with the passage of the amendment ."