View Poll Results: Why don't crazed mass murderers throw hand grenades in to crowds?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Because they aren't available to the general public

    12 66.67%
  • Because they are to heavy

    0 0%
  • It's Hillarty's fault

    6 33.33%
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
Thanks Tree16Thanks

Thread: Why don't crazed mass murderers throw hand grenades in to crowds?

  1. #21
    Chaos in fourteen lines Minotaur's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    20,504
    Thanks
    16556

    From
    USA
    Hand grenades don't kill a mass of people, people pulling the trigger kills a mass of people.

    Personal backpack nuclear bombs don't kill a mass of people.

    Purse sized sulfur mustard spray does not kill a mass of people.

    Assault weapons and magazines do not kill a mass of people either.

    Hillary killed people.

    Hope that helps.

  2. #22
    Veteran Member Devil505's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    63,472
    Thanks
    20232

    From
    Mass and Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    By what right do we outlaw machine guns and grenades when the Constitution clearly states that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?
    Congress has the right to regulate commerce.
    Gun sales are commerce and regulation is not infringement.

  3. #23
    Veteran Member Devil505's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    63,472
    Thanks
    20232

    From
    Mass and Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by Minotaur View Post
    Hand grenades don't kill a mass of people, people pulling the trigger kills a mass of people.

    Personal backpack nuclear bombs don't kill a mass of people.

    Purse sized sulfur mustard spray does not kill a mass of people.

    Assault weapons and magazines do not kill a mass of people either.

    Hillary killed people.
    lol

  4. #24
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    11,702
    Thanks
    5918

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    Congress has the right to regulate commerce.
    Gun sales are commerce and regulation is not infringement.
    Interstate commerce. It can regulate what i sold state to state. It has no right to infringe on the citizens' right to bear arms.

  5. #25
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    25,842
    Thanks
    4863

    Quote Originally Posted by HenryPorter View Post
    Dev, the reason few are responding is because, hand grenades are banned. Wingnuts won't come near this thread.
    I wish they banned meth as it has destroyed a lot of lives.

  6. #26
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    25,842
    Thanks
    4863

    Quote Originally Posted by Minotaur View Post
    Hand grenades don't kill a mass of people, people pulling the trigger kills a mass of people.

    Personal backpack nuclear bombs don't kill a mass of people.

    Purse sized sulfur mustard spray does not kill a mass of people.

    Assault weapons and magazines do not kill a mass of people either.

    Hillary killed people.

    Hope that helps.
    She likely wouldn't kill herself, others do it for her. There are a few in the Middle East. The ones in Arkansas are a little harder to explain.

  7. #27
    A Character Tennyson's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    503

    From
    Barsoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    BS from the NRA
    I am pretty sure that came from me.

  8. #28
    A Character Tennyson's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    503

    From
    Barsoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    Congress has the right to regulate commerce.
    Gun sales are commerce and regulation is not infringement.
    The word "regulate" in the commerce clause did not regard regulations. The commerce clause is interstate, not intrastate. Its purpose and intent came out of the Mt. Vernon Conference and the Annapolis Convention, and that purpose singular: to keep the flow of goods interstate and international moving and by preventing land-locked states from being onerously taxed on goods being shipped and received by states with ports and river access.

  9. #29
    Veteran Member Devil505's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    63,472
    Thanks
    20232

    From
    Mass and Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    Interstate commerce. It can regulate what i sold state to state. It has no right to infringe on the citizens' right to bear arms.
    SCOTUS disagrees.

  10. #30
    Veteran Member Devil505's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    63,472
    Thanks
    20232

    From
    Mass and Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by Tennyson View Post
    I am pretty sure that came from me.
    I'm positive it got there by listening to NRA propaganda.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Trump/Teaparty "Poltical ICON" hand in hand.
    By goldendog in forum Current Events
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 1st July 2016, 09:11 PM
  2. Replies: 121
    Last Post: 22nd August 2014, 01:23 AM
  3. Racist murderers caught
    By The Man in forum Current Events
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 29th June 2014, 08:43 AM
  4. Do Racism, Conservatism, and Low I.Q. Go Hand in Hand?
    By BDBoop in forum Political Controversies
    Replies: 253
    Last Post: 9th May 2013, 04:16 PM
  5. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 23rd July 2012, 09:58 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed