Members banned from this thread: KnotaFrayed


View Poll Results: If a child hits another child with a stick.

Voters
11. You may not vote on this poll
  • Give every child a stick.

    0 0%
  • Give a few people concealed sticks and stick training.

    1 9.09%
  • Take away the stick

    10 90.91%
Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 104
Thanks Tree73Thanks

Thread: If a child hits another child with a stick.

  1. #21
    Senior Member NeoVsMatrix's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,631
    Thanks
    7654

    From
    NY
    Quote Originally Posted by Miller47 View Post
    You can stick this argument into a place where the sun doesn't shine...
    That's where the right want all arguments to be buried that they can't counter. If they don't see it, it doesn't exist... toddler logic.

  2. #22
    A Character Tennyson's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    504

    From
    Barsoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    Nether is an assault rifle or a high capacity magazine.
    Yes they are regarding the Second Amendment.

  3. #23
    Veteran Member Devil505's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    64,164
    Thanks
    20871

    From
    Mass and Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by Tennyson View Post
    Yes they are regarding the Second Amendment.
    The SCOTUS upheld the 1994-2004 AWB which banned them both.
    Look it up.

  4. #24
    Dick with my Buzz...Try DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    36,892
    Thanks
    31784

    From
    SWUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by Tennyson View Post
    A stick in the hand of a child is not an unalienable right protected from the government by the Constitution.
    If it were inalienable, then it would not need to be protected. You have an inalienable right to breathe air.

  5. #25
    A Character Tennyson's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    504

    From
    Barsoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    The SCOTUS upheld the 1994-2004 AWB which banned them both.
    I am not arguing the Supreme Court. If you want to use a case, then you will need to defend its constitutional basis.

  6. #26
    A Character Tennyson's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    504

    From
    Barsoom
    Quote Originally Posted by DebateDrone View Post
    If it were inalienable, then it would not need to be protected. You have an inalienable right to breathe air.
    I did not say it was protected. I said it was protected from the government. It is a restriction on the government.

  7. #27
    Spock of Vulcan Ian Jeffrey's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    64,361
    Thanks
    32606

    From
    Vulcan
    Quote Originally Posted by Tennyson View Post
    I am not arguing the Supreme Court. If you want to use a case, then you will need to defend its constitutional basis.
    Well, no. Case law is law itself and needs no defense.

    Sent from my SM-J327V using Tapatalk
    Thanks from Devil505 and Madeline

  8. #28
    A Character Tennyson's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Thanks
    504

    From
    Barsoom
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Jeffrey View Post
    Well, no. Case law is law itself and needs no defense.

    Sent from my SM-J327V using Tapatalk
    We will always disagree on this point, but that is what makes the world go 'round.

  9. #29
    Spock of Vulcan Ian Jeffrey's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    64,361
    Thanks
    32606

    From
    Vulcan
    Quote Originally Posted by Tennyson View Post
    A stick in the hand of a child is not an unalienable right protected from the government by the Constitution.
    Even constitutionally guaranteed rights have limits. For example, laws preventing felons from possessing guns are constitutional.

    Sent from my SM-J327V using Tapatalk
    Thanks from OldGaffer and Madeline

  10. #30
    Spock of Vulcan Ian Jeffrey's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    64,361
    Thanks
    32606

    From
    Vulcan
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    While the metaphor is overly simple it makes a clear point.
    No it is not, because it is not analogous.

    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    Can I assume we both agree that weapons ..... with little to no benefit to society that can kill hundreds of people very quickly should not be readily available to the public?
    I do not believe that is a valid constitutional consideration.

    Sent from my SM-J327V using Tapatalk

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 224
    Last Post: 13th January 2016, 01:22 AM
  2. When is it okay to hit a child?
    By The Man in forum Current Events
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 14th October 2014, 04:03 PM
  3. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 15th September 2014, 05:44 AM
  4. Is needlessly sacrificing your child, as God did, child abuse and murder?
    By Gnostic Christian Bishop in forum Philosophy and Religion
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 12th December 2013, 05:50 AM
  5. Replies: 200
    Last Post: 14th August 2013, 08:55 AM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed