Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 99
Thanks Tree73Thanks

Thread: If you claim to be Christian.....Tell us....what did Christ teach

  1. #11
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    30,381
    Thanks
    23930

    From
    On a hill
    Quote Originally Posted by MaryAnne View Post
    That is the point,Knight. We do not have to invade any country. The killings are the very reason we have so many attacks here.

    Wars are about nothing but power for the few.
    We didn't have so many attacks here until boy george decided to use Iraq as flypaper for terrorists. Kinda backfired.
    Thanks from KnotaFrayed and MaryAnne

  2. #12
    Veteran Member MaryAnne's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    45,203
    Thanks
    32121

    From
    Englewood,Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Eve1 View Post
    Following our own values my immediate family went grocery shopping and picked up a list of items that our local food bank had requested on their web site. They are looking to put together holiday baskets to help out needy families in the area. We are on our way to leave them at a drop off location were several other people are doing the same thing. A food bank truck is expected to pick up the whole lot today and bring it to their warehouse for sorting into baskets ready to go to the most needy before the holidays.

    ***People are hungry all over the world. We can't help everyone but charity starts in your local community so help when you can, where you can, as much as you can, and how you can.
    We have a FISH basket at the Y. I am going tomorrow to pick up things. Our Church had both Sox baskets and coats. Much better than buying gifts for those who need nothing.

    The Sermon this morning reminded me of how we start with ourselves,it grows.
    Thanks from KnotaFrayed and cable2

  3. #13
    Veteran Member MaryAnne's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    45,203
    Thanks
    32121

    From
    Englewood,Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by labrea View Post
    We didn't have so many attacks here until boy george decided to use Iraq as flypaper for terrorists. Kinda backfired.
    That is why I think we should walk away,say No More. Trump promised to put America first. We shall see, but I know everyone is sick of all the killing. It is doing nothing. I wonder how those who blithely lied us into war sleep at night.
    Thanks from cable2

  4. #14
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    21,272
    Thanks
    5721

    From
    midwest
    Quote Originally Posted by MaryAnne View Post
    That is why I think we should walk away,say No More. Trump promised to put America first. We shall see, but I know everyone is sick of all the killing. It is doing nothing. I wonder how those who blithely lied us into war sleep at night.
    I don't think we can always "walk away,say No More".

    I think America was right for declaring war on Germany and Japan and for waging WWII.

    The Nazis rounded up and exterminated millions of Jews.

    I think we were right for not walking away from that one.

    That's just one example...

    We should probably walk away from more, but not all.

  5. #15
    Human Bean KnotaFrayed's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    13,130
    Thanks
    10891

    From
    Here
    Quote Originally Posted by MaryAnne View Post
    Just coming from Church where the Sermon was about PEACE! I could not help thinking, What if we just decided we are a peaceful nation? Walked away from all the wars we are waging and quit meddling in other countries?

    Do not give me the bit about because being strong. We are strong, but we are weakening our nation by fighting sect wars.

    We could better prove our strength by refusing to kill. By walking away we would be saying," No more," to the other countries.it could not be worse.
    It is interesting to think that Christ, when they arrested him, Peter (if it indeed was Peter) drew his sword and cut off the ear of a soldier, he not only did not resist the arrest, he healed the ear of the soldier, told Peter to put away his sword, warning him that those that live by the sword, shall die by it. He also asked that his disciples be left alone to go on their way.

    During one trial, the crowd chanted (reminiscent of the chants during the RNC) "crucify him, crucify him"...........Christ did not resist being forced to wear a crown of thorns and dragging the cross he would be nailed to through the streets and when nailed to the cross and speared in the gut by a soldier, he didn't call in an airstrike by God, he asked God to forgive those who crucified him.

    All are in line with what he taught in the book of Matthew Chapter V (perhaps the most forgotten, ignored chapter of all the books of the Bible (while some obsess about abortion and homosexuality))

    My interpretation of the often repeated statement that "Christ died for our sins", is that indeed, Christ did die as a result of human sins (they crucified him). That "he died for our sins" seems like some excuse to not follow his teachings because no matter what anyone does, they will be forgiven. Whether someone believes he was a demigod, a god, just related to a god or simply a human being that became legend in the eyes of many because of his way and his teachings and they saw the benefits of them, when people actually lived according to them, there are a lot of values shared across many cultures, religions and secular values. The key to it all seems to be societies of humans that actually try to live according to human values, shared across the board.

    My belief about vengeance and revenge is that they only perpetuate evil, by doing the evil one has done to others, in return.

    There is of course, an instinctual human survival reaction and response when under attack in the form of fending off the attack, yet there is no requirement to kill as part of fending off an attack, only to stop the attack. In that process, sometimes people get killed as a result, but Christ/God (and others, religious and secular) indicate that killing is wrong, yet some have taken it on as a policy even to the point of pre-emptive (premeditated) action, believed to be a "preventive" action in the name of zeroing out risk. The only problem is that it is a presumptive "response" that someone is going to do something before they actually do it. There was a book and a movie that delved into the pitfalls of pre-emptive "defense" especially where it involves force, more specifically, deadly force.

    There was an interesting story the other day I about what I believe was an ex-marine who became a police officer and was trained differently (his Marine training) than police officers in recognizing and diffusive potentially volatile and deadly situation. He diffused a situation where someone had a gun and brought it to a safe conclusion, but was reprimanded for putting people at risk. While I totally recognize the need for law enforcement to be and remain safe in doing their jobs, I can't remember a period of time in my life when it seems the policy of law enforcement departments is to shoot first, not just to wound and disable, but to kill and ask questions later. The problem I see with this is that it tends to serve as a judge, jury and executioner at the same time and presents an irretrievable situation in the loss of life of people that may never have caused harm to anyone. I would like to think that there is absolutely no justification to consciously take another life. I'm not talking about trading the safety of law enforcement for killers, but about how anyone knows someone is a killer, until they kill and why potential threats need to be riddled with holes, not disarmed in their potential attack, by some other means that does not take their lives. Do all potential threats really need to be shot dead? To me, there seems to be a disturbing trend of law enforcement killing, instead of disarming or disabling a potential attack and and equally or more disturbing trend, that some are feeling that because in some situations, it appears law enforcement is given an inequitable accountability when it comes to killing and they fear that this, connected to personal prejudices and a certain freedom from the same level of accountability a non-law enforcement citizen would face for the same, heightens their level of fear of being killed without cause. Some appear to have sought revenge on law enforcement, others appear to be arming themselves in the event that are profiled and stopped and this only heightens the tension and chances that they actually will be shot because the presence of their weapon (intended to be a tool of defense against profiling and being shot by prejudiced law enforcement) makes them appear as a threat. Some people fear that unless they have a weapon, they will be shot without a means to defend themselves, but their weapon, at the same time, makes them appear to be a threat.

    It is a real issue for those who feel caught between the fear of being defenseless and being shot by law enforcement and carrying a weapon to defend themselves against the chances they could be shot by law enforcement and each incident and subsequent investigation and the appearance of the benefit of the doubt being given to law enforcement only heightens the level of fear and tension for both law enforcement and citizens that feel they are profiled by those who are bad cops.

    In line with this thread and your thoughts, it seems we need to seriously work on ways to diffuse and calm because things appear to have been escalating. Thoughts of vengeance and retribution always seems to contribute to escalation, not peace.......

    My concerns are the same as yours in that there seems to be an attitude of people thinking they need to somehow prove they are "tough", physically and by action and in some ways feel a need to "act out" to demonstrate how "tough" they are and they do so when and where it is not necessary or by doing so against innocent people. In my experience, the truly tough people do not need to prove anything, they just ARE tough, when there is a real need to be so and they don't do it for show, to receive praise, thanks or notoriety. Today it seems the opposite amongst too many. Perhaps it comes from some feeling of inadequacy or low self esteem.... I don't know. I do agree with you that restraint often or mostly, takes even more strength than letting our tempers get the best of us. Restraint is truly hard to maintain at all times and I do not always check myself on boards like these. It is always very tempting to do unto others as they have done unto us, rather then do unto others as we want them to do to us.

    Peace to you.....MA
    Best,
    Knot
    Thanks from cable2

  6. #16
    Human Bean KnotaFrayed's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    13,130
    Thanks
    10891

    From
    Here
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    I don't understand this question.
    I rephrased it, but basically the last question is about looking at yourself/ourselves by looking at our postings here as if they were written by someone else, not us to see if our postings align or match up with what we claim to believe in or the same scrutiny we use when we see the postings of others. In short, are we being true to ourselves and living according the standards we believe or indicate we expect or desire others to live by. Hope that helps.
    Thanks from cable2

  7. #17
    Human Bean KnotaFrayed's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    13,130
    Thanks
    10891

    From
    Here
    Quote Originally Posted by Humorme View Post
    That, regardless of the criticisms or the misguided notion of masses the postings remain consistent, honest and in accordance of defending those who don't have a qualified voice.


    Note my answers are in red. You might not read them, but thanks for the thread. It will make me pause and reflect on this. Maybe I might even become more patient when faced with Internet bullies.
    Thank you......We live in an age where conformity or belief is not as required or forced now, as in other periods in human history, thus in many ways whether our beliefs are strictly spiritual or strictly secular, it seems we are more under our own cognizance than in the past, where things like inquisitions would test our adherence to beliefs, even if such things, perhaps even the trials and crucifixion of Christ, involved a mix of politics, fear or struggles over power. From what I can gather of Christian belief, it has always been up to each individual to live (love too) according to the teachings of their "God", but as we know, there have been elected (elected in what some might consider an insular, perhaps in some ways interbred "system") human "leaders" of ways to believe, depending upon the religion. Pope, Cardinals, Bishops, Lamas, Imams, priests, pastors.....etc. etc and hierarchies of "clergy" to keep their "flocks" in line or simply to attend to their needs.....in some cases after working to convert "heathens" (no less human than others) to the "right" way to believe. We also know, as the founders of this nation did, because of their place in time relative to when struggles for dominance within the "Christian faith" for dominance within that faith that some of the bloodiest times in history were about religious dominance within the Christian faith.

    In short, if those that believe in the teachings of Christ (or of anything, secular or religious) do not live according to their beliefs, who will? Granted, living up to our own standards may be the biggest challenge any human faces, but it would seem blatant and constantly "justified" or "excused" reasons to not adhere to one's own beliefs only seems to foment hypocrisy and in many ways seems to make a mockery of the beliefs anyone claims they believe in, but mostly ignore. It perhaps may be better to not make claims to follow the teachings of Christ or any God, spiritual or secular leader, than to claim to do what one does not do or even defies. Repentance and forgiveness seem to be all about not giving up and second chances and less about a license to not learn from mistakes and repeat the same frailties or sins over and over again without remorse and essentially taking advantage of some notion that one will always be forgiven so there is no incentive to be stop "sinning" or defying what one claims to believe in. It then seems to become a tool of deception to claim to be a believer in what one does not truly believe in, ignores and defies or makes a mockery of.

    For a long time there has been a respectful association or reverence that came along with a spiritual belief, in that most religions seem to be based in observances and recommendations for peaceful and cooperative human existence and perhaps the notion that "religious" people were somehow at least trying to do good, for all those in the past that forced others to that belief instead of allowing them to come to it of their own accord because they saw something attractive in it.

    Some or a lot of that respectful association has been or is being lost because of those who claim to be followers of religions/teachings/philosophies they ignore and defy when it comes to living by them.
    Last edited by KnotaFrayed; 12th December 2016 at 07:32 PM.
    Thanks from MaryAnne

  8. #18
    Junior Member Gnostic Christian Bishop's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,780
    Thanks
    145

    From
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by MaryAnne View Post
    Just coming from Church where the Sermon was about PEACE! I could not help thinking, What if we just decided we are a peaceful nation? Walked away from all the wars we are waging and quit meddling in other countries?

    Do not give me the bit about because being strong. We are strong, but we are weakening our nation by fighting sect wars.

    We could better prove our strength by refusing to kill. By walking away we would be saying," No more," to the other countries.it could not be worse.
    Jesus said he came to bring a sword and not peace.

    I do like seeking peace though but you live in a free country whose freedom was paid for in blood.

    As a free person, can you articulate what your first duty to others is if you were to live by the golden rule of doing unto others?

    The way I see me living by that rule, and my first duty to my fellow man, is to insure by whatever means possible that all share in the freedoms that I enjoy.

    If that is not your first duty as a free person then what is?

    Regards
    DL

  9. #19
    Junior Member Gnostic Christian Bishop's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,780
    Thanks
    145

    From
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Bourne View Post
    I am a practicing Catholic and a Christian. I support His Holiness, The Pope, and the Catholic Doctrine.

    Regards and Merry Christmas,

    Bourne
    Can I have your thoughts on these?

    As Ingersoll said; 'no man would be fit for heaven who would consent that an innocent person should suffer for his sin.'

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKNu...s_digest-vrecs


    Having another innocent person suffer for the wrongs you have done, --- so that you might escape responsibility for having done them, --- is immoral.

    Do you agree?

    Regards
    DL

  10. #20
    Galactic Ruler Spookycolt's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2012
    Posts
    60,172
    Thanks
    11005

    From
    By the wall
    Quote Originally Posted by KnotaFrayed View Post
    I rephrased it, but basically the last question is about looking at yourself/ourselves by looking at our postings here as if they were written by someone else, not us to see if our postings align or match up with what we claim to believe in or the same scrutiny we use when we see the postings of others. In short, are we being true to ourselves and living according the standards we believe or indicate we expect or desire others to live by. Hope that helps.
    I am a Christian and I can tell you that I fail miserably at it and many of my postings (I've gotten better) have shown that.

    I have been very hypocritical at times but I am trying to improve. Its not an overnight process.

    If I were able to live by Christ's teachings he wouldn't have had to die for me on the cross.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dear Offended Christian, From a Very Tired Christian
    By Wonderer in forum Philosophy and Religion
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 12th June 2016, 08:16 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 3rd February 2016, 07:41 PM
  3. Replies: 79
    Last Post: 23rd March 2015, 12:02 PM
  4. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 1st April 2014, 08:19 AM
  5. Teach your son about the life and meaning of Christ this Christmas...
    By Dr.Knuckles in forum Philosophy and Religion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 7th September 2010, 06:44 AM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed