| || |
I know this will be complicated for you but give it a try.
Summary of Scientific Evidence for Creation (Part I & II) | The Institute for Creation ResearchDefinitions of the Creation Model and the Evolution Model
The scientific model of creation, in summary, includes the scientific evidence for a sudden creation of complex and diversified kinds of life, with systematic gaps persisting between different kinds and with genetic variation occurring within each kind since that time. The scientific model of evolution, in summary, includes the scientific evidence for a gradual emergence of present life kinds over aeons of time, with emergence of complex and diversified kinds of life from simpler kinds and ultimately from nonliving matter. The creation model questions vertical evolution, which is the emergence of complex from simple and change between kinds, but it does not challenge what is often called horizontal evolution or microevolution, which creationists call genetic variation or species or subspecies formation within created kinds.
So in yours and many other liberals ignorance of science you hear the word creation and think it means god but it doesn't.
It is simply another scientific theory, one that says creation happened in a rather short period of time rather than over millions of years.
This theory is also used in evolutionary theory itself in regards to the human species traveling out of Africa and migrating around the world, it challenges that by providing evidence that this early species of man started at multiple points around the globe at the same time.
Not that there is any problem with having a religion. I do. But religion cannot be conflated with science just because science conflicts with your beliefs. Rather, you need to harmonize your beliefs with known scientific facts.