| || |
We even seen a horrible case of this in the Duggar case.
I have no problem if Jews, Muslims or Christians wish to resolve disputes using their holy books...I have a problem with using Sharia law in lieu of and skirting US law.
In the case of Jewish law, the power of a beis din is relevant only to religious law - again, unless the parties agree otherwise.
And in either case, there are reasons agreements can be voided by a court, should there be a (secular, of course) legal basis for undermining the agreement.
The purpose of sharia is to constitute a polity with islam as the basis for law.
Canon law is an ecclesiastical law that governs the conduct of the church (its clergy and adherents) wherever they may be. The church does not presume to govern people of different religions even if they lived in a christian state.