Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
Thanks Tree2Thanks

Thread: Three perspectives on why man is Godís master.

  1. #11
    Galactic Ruler Spookycolt's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2012
    Posts
    49,645
    Thanks
    9229

    From
    By the wall
    Quote Originally Posted by Gnostic Christian Bishop View Post
    "Its not like God doesn't use science"

    You have nothing to back your assumption and for theists to follow demonstrably immoral Gods in the meantime, without evidence of his reality, is to go into intellectual and particularly moral dissonance.

    Theists should seek a moral God if they need one and condemn the vile and immoral Gods on offer from the mainstream religions.

    Why do you thin theists have gone moved to intellectual and particularly moral dissonance.

    Regards
    DL
    True, this is an assumption but I do expect that God used current physics to create everything.

    Why not, he is God after all and made those physics.

    The proof of his reality is the inability for non-believers to disprove it.

    What more do you need. This whole argument could easily be settled by one little lab experiment yet science cannot duplicate what God did.

    Why is that?

  2. #12
    Junior Member Gnostic Christian Bishop's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,640
    Thanks
    134

    From
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    True, this is an assumption but I do expect that God used current physics to create everything.

    Why not, he is God after all and made those physics.

    The proof of his reality is the inability for non-believers to disprove it.

    What more do you need. This whole argument could easily be settled by one little lab experiment yet science cannot duplicate what God did.

    Why is that?
    That is because you offer a logical fallacy that is impossible to do.

    It is to those who cry wolf to show the tracks or the shit.
    It is not to others to prove that those who cry wolf are liars.

    That is evident from their lack of proof or evidence.

    Fact is, atheist have more proof of God's non-existence than theists have.

    Theists have nothing while atheists have the fact that God is not here and now.

    That my dear is evidence that all imaginary Gods are imaginary.

    Prove me wrong. You should be able to as that is not a logical fallacy demanding you prove what cannot be proven.

    Regards
    DL

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Looking forward to seeing new perspectives.
    By Minotaur in forum New Users
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 4th November 2013, 04:03 AM
  2. New Perspectives, More Voices
    By Interested Mind in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27th April 2008, 02:01 PM
  3. Professional Perspectives: Fluoride in Tap Water
    By dirtyp in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2nd April 2008, 07:36 PM
  4. Perspectives on the Left
    By Nerdo in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13th May 2007, 07:54 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed