Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 38 of 38
Thanks Tree19Thanks

Thread: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.

  1. #31
    ~ The loyal opposition ~ Puzzling Evidence's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    14,378
    Thanks
    6190

    From
    The bottomless pit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    " Meaning What "

    * Flip Sides *

    Is rejecting nazism anti-japthetic ?

    A semite is a generalized term for a lineal descendant of shem , which has been associated in history with a pseudo-scientific racial paradigm for brown eumelanin , with ham being associated with black eumelanin and japheth being associated with white or no melanin .

    There is also a red melanin and a couple of others .

    One cannot change their race , however they can change their creed .

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamitic
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japhetites
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semites

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ham,_son_of_Noah
    Listen, NO ONE FUCKING KNOWS what color any of Noah's kids were. IT'S FUCKING BULLSHIT. It doesn't even say that in the damned bible, racist southerners concocted that to justify slavery.
    Last edited by Puzzling Evidence; 1st May 2017 at 06:15 PM.

  2. #32
    ~ The loyal opposition ~ Puzzling Evidence's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    14,378
    Thanks
    6190

    From
    The bottomless pit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    " Just Because You Think They Are After You "

    * Does Not Mean They Are Not *

    #I_SLAM_A_PHOBIA is the paranoia and delusion of fictional ishmaelism used to implement unprovoked violence against non believers for +1400 years in defence of hejaz , while it was not ever under duress .
    Oh, just fucking stop. As if Christians did not oppress people -- they certainly did.

  3. #33
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,547
    Thanks
    366

    From
    Yesod

    Covert Votes Overt Politics

    " Covert Votes Overt Politics "

    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzling Evidence View Post
    Listen, NO ONE FUCKING KNOWS what color any of Noah's kids were. IT'S FUCKING BULLSHIT. It doesn't even say that in the damned bible, racist southerners concocted that to justify slavery.
    * Twisted On Tight *

    Yeah , sure , racist southerners concocted it all on their own , well , that is your racist BULLSHIT .

    One of the first attempts of fictional ishmaelism to get its way is to convince fools that disgust for its vile tenets is based upon racism , so as to exploit a knee jerk objection , as even it is lost in an ability to understand that qurayshism is a genetic religion which does not apply outside of hejaz .

    It was stated that the racial paradigm is pseudo-science and good luck with all those versions of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deluge_(mythology) .


    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzling Evidence View Post
    Oh, just fucking stop. As if Christians did not oppress people -- they certainly did.
    * Fine Print *

    If you asserting that christians are to kill or convert others by the sword then reference it in the gospel .

    Otherwise , address the depraved implications of surah 2 , where its author explains why , for one " sacred month " , during he hajj , there is no compulsion to their religion and to only fight those who fight them , in the context of temporarily setting aside directives in surah 9 to convert non believers by the sword .

    However , as has been stated before as an excuse for ignorance , " I am not a scholar of qurayshism , so go confront one which is . " .

    Well they are confronted and they skulk away in decline to address the issue , murmuring a trite obfuscation , without explanation , that they disagree , likely wishing for relief from the dissent by a flash mob .
    Last edited by Monk-Eye; 2nd May 2017 at 12:04 AM.

  4. #34
    ~ The loyal opposition ~ Puzzling Evidence's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    14,378
    Thanks
    6190

    From
    The bottomless pit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk-Eye View Post
    " Covert Votes Overt Politics "

    * Twisted On Tight *

    Yeah , sure , racist southerners concocted it all on their own , well , that is your racist BULLSHIT .

    One of the first attempts of fictional ishmaelism to get its way is to convince fools that disgust for its vile tenets is based upon racism , so as to exploit a knee jerk objection , as even it is lost in an ability to understand that qurayshism is a genetic religion which does not apply outside of hejaz .

    It was stated that the racial paradigm is pseudo-science and good luck with all those versions of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deluge_(mythology) .


    * Fine Print *

    If you asserting that christians are to kill or convert others by the sword then reference it in the gospel .

    Otherwise , address the depraved implications of surah 2 , where its author explains why , for one " sacred month " , during he hajj , there is no compulsion to their religion and to only fight those who fight them , in the context of temporarily setting aside directives in surah 9 to convert non believers by the sword .


    However , as has been stated before as an excuse for ignorance , " I am not a scholar of qurayshism , so go confront one which is . " .

    Well they are confronted and they skulk away in decline to address the issue , murmuring a trite obfuscation , without explanation , that they disagree , likely wishing for relief from the dissent by a flash mob .
    Christians converted enemies by force, only a fool would deny this.

    The bible is filled to the rim with horrible stories that Christians very conveniently ignore. People killed for stupid reasons....like making fun pf a bald man. Oh, the Quran has bad stories too? Who knew...
    Last edited by Puzzling Evidence; 2nd May 2017 at 08:06 AM.

  5. #35
    Junior Member Gnostic Christian Bishop's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,640
    Thanks
    134

    From
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzling Evidence View Post
    Would this thread stand if it were antisemitic?
    I am attacking an ideology, not any single people.

    Would it stand then if I was attacking the Jewish religion? Yes.

    Regards
    DL

  6. #36
    Junior Member Gnostic Christian Bishop's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,640
    Thanks
    134

    From
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by PACE View Post
    You're an Islamophobe. So What?
    Ah. Another who does not know the meaning of the word.

    I am not phobic. My fears are legitimate.

    Regards
    DL

  7. #37
    Junior Member Gnostic Christian Bishop's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,640
    Thanks
    134

    From
    Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzling Evidence View Post
    Oh, just fucking stop. As if Christians did not oppress people -- they certainly did.
    I agree.

    Both Christianity and Islam have basically developed into intolerant, homophobic and misogynous religions. Both religions have grown themselves by the sword instead of good deeds.

    Jesus said we would know his people by their works and deeds. That means Jesus would not recognize Christians and Muslims as his people, and neither do I.

    Regards
    DL

  8. #38
    Polemicist Supremum Monk-Eye's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,547
    Thanks
    366

    From
    Yesod

    Rationalizing Deals With Devils

    " Rationalizing Deals With Devils "

    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzling Evidence View Post
    Christians converted enemies by force, only a fool would deny this.
    The bible is filled to the rim with horrible stories that Christians very conveniently ignore. People killed for stupid reasons....like making fun pf a bald man. Oh, the Quran has bad stories too? Who knew...
    * Conveniently Ignoring Major Issues *

    To a " christian " one can challenge , " Is conversion by the sword directed by the gospel ? " , to which they would be incriminated by the sermon on the mount for asserting that such a directive exists .

    The adherents of torahnism do not proselytize and its adherents do not expect the legal system of torah to apply outside of israel , and even if directives exist to establish that city sate by violence , it is limited in scope and does not represent a general expectation for aggression against non believers extant with that city state .

    Now neither of those conditions is true of fictional ishmaelism , which means that at any moment a directive for violence against non believers outside of hejaz can be invoked by doctrine , where numbers translate into votes , even as they laud democracy for its tyranny by majority .

    Thus , as long as adherents not accept that the qurayn is limited to hejaz , just as the torah is limited to israel , as parallel genetic religions for their respective patriarchs , then the non negotiable expectations for violence against non believers and against individual liberty as fictional ishmaelism remains viable for foment by demagogues and the masses susceptible to opiate of absolution by moral puritanism .

    This has nothing to do with whether " bad seeds " in history took it upon themselves to enact the ethically reprehensible , in false proclamation , which modern adherents deem contrary with doctrine , because such an abrogation is a farce according to fictional ishmaelism .

    Thus , based upon non aggression principles one is entitled to self defense for illegitimate aggression ( violence ) directed against their person or property , and there is no way that fictional ishmaelism deserves anything other than castigation and vilification for its core tenets of violence that are exemplified in its history and covertly expressed in its doctrine .

    It is clear that non aggression principles are self evident and apatheistic of denomination , whereby you are challenged to deal directly with the deviations rather than pandering to liars and suffering the objective ignorance of their fools .
    Last edited by Monk-Eye; 2nd May 2017 at 04:07 PM.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 74
    Last Post: 4th January 2016, 06:50 AM
  2. ‘Comedian’ launches Islamophobe drawing contest
    By meridian5455 in forum Current Events
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12th May 2015, 11:27 AM
  3. Moral Absolutism
    By Bassman in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 254
    Last Post: 31st October 2012, 09:34 PM
  4. Can Atheists Be Moral?
    By TortoiseDream in forum Philosophy and Religion
    Replies: 123
    Last Post: 26th July 2010, 09:39 PM
  5. Moral developement
    By Maritxu in forum Philosophy and Religion
    Replies: 146
    Last Post: 27th May 2007, 05:22 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed