Thread: Why doesn’t FFRF go after Muslims?

Originally Posted by Panzareta

Your book was written by an emperor and later revised by a king. In order to get the uneducated masses to act much like you do here.

Historians disagree with you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...of_the_Gospels

Originally Posted by Michael J

Yep, you're definitely a child in a remedial class.

You're the only one who can't comment correctly on Isaiah.

Still can't comment like an adult. Sad.

Originally Posted by Michael J

No historians documented Christ's resurrection. Historians proved Flavius Josephus' one brief, sporadic paragraph about Christ's resurrection a fraud many years ago. It was most likely the church "historian" Eusebius who forged that passage, since there is no non-biblical documentation of the resurrection before Eusebius took office.



You think I'm trolling just because I challenge your stupid dogma. That is idiotic. It's also a key feature of fascism: the Christian life lives for a struggle. Anyone who questions you, just because they question you, is threatening the Christian survival.

If Jesus didn't raise from the Dead, then all the disciples except John were put to death for their testimony's confirming it. They tried killing John by putting him in boiling oil and he survived and was put on the island of Patmos and wrote the book of Revelation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Patmos

Originally Posted by Dangermouse

“The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd; indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widely spread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.”
― Bertrand Russell, Marriage and Morals

To a point I agree with that. Liberals formed a new belief by a majority with no scientific proof. Anyone disagree's with it is marginalized. Know what that is?

Originally Posted by aboutenough

Still can't comment like an adult. Sad.

You're the one stuck in a remedial class. Sooner or later, you'll realize why you're there.

Originally Posted by aboutenough

If Jesus didn't raise from the Dead, then all the disciples except John were put to death for their testimony's confirming it. They tried killing John by putting him in boiling oil and he survived and was put on the island of Patmos and wrote the book of Revelation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Patmos

How would that prove Christ was resurrected? That's not even germane to the resurrection. The invisible resurrected Christ appeared out of nowhere, waved his magic wand and magically made John's flesh impervious to hot oil?

Maybe John took some kind of potent drug to make his flesh do that? My mom is a Methodist, and she doesn't even read that chapter. "That author sounds like he's on an acid trip," she said. John has to be on something to write a book like that.

Originally Posted by Michael J

You're the one stuck in a remedial class. Sooner or later, you'll realize why you're there.

Insults won't hurt me. Make a intelligent comment and I will respond, otherwise you are off my radar.

Originally Posted by Michael J

How would that prove Christ was resurrected? That's not even germane to the resurrection. The invisible resurrected Christ appeared out of nowhere, waved his magic wand and magically made John's flesh impervious to hot oil?

Maybe John took some kind of potent drug to make his flesh do that? My mom is a Methodist, and she doesn't even read that chapter. "That author sounds like he's on an acid trip," she said. John has to be on something to write a book like that.

Would you die for a lie? Thats what you are implying. All those disciples decided it was ok to die because they wanted to make up the resurrection to scare guys like you into thinking a Theocracy movement is going to take over the world

Originally Posted by aboutenough

Would you die for a lie? Thats what you are implying.

This logical fallacy is called Argumentum ad Martyrdom. Just because someone died for what they believe doesn't mean what they believe is true. There are probably Scientologists who'd die for L. Ron Hubbard.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_martyrdom

Originally Posted by aboutenough

All those disciples decided it was ok to die because they wanted to make up the resurrection to scare guys like you into thinking a Theocracy movement is going to take over the world

Well, people in those days weren't exactly intelligent.

Originally Posted by aboutenough

Insults won't hurt me.

Fascist, you finally learned how to make contractions. Your mom should bake you a cake and hold a celebration party for you.

Originally Posted by aboutenough

Make a intelligent comment and I will respond, otherwise you are off my radar.

Now we need to work on articles. When using indefinite articles, adjectives and nouns that start with vowels must be preceded by the article, "an." If the adjective or noun starts with a consonant, it must be preceded by the indefinite article, "a." Your sentence should read "Make an intelligent comment and I will respond..."