Members banned from this thread: Hairball
Interesting that you should refer to pedophiles and adulterers together. Does that mean you consider heterosexual people who have sex with people other than their spouses to be morally the same as child molesters?Adulterers and pedophiles are unique too.
I didn't disagree with your right to disagree. I just disagree with your opinion. Which you interpret as denying you a right to an opinion. Which naturally leads you to cry victim and claim that I am trying to muzzle you. Typical r/w extremist view. By the sounds of your argument you can't handle dissent. Definitely r/w extremist.So...as usual...the liberals that say they are about tolerance, that they cherish our freedom of speech and our rights to disagree and dissent...Now state openly (and grossly hypocritically)favor in their particular cause or bent, the silencing of voices of dissent and disgreement.
here is what I wrote.. it was given in toungue in cheek to another poster who suggested we should rewrite the first amendment I jokingly changed hte first amendment and ask him if this would be what he wanted,, He and I were on the same page with this. YOu come along and interject yourself without knowing the context of the conversation and get all butt hurt and start yapping at me .. WHY..?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; unless a segment of the population deems the speech to be offensive, or abridging the freedom of speech, unless the speech is not in an approved form, or of the press; unless they make disparaging remarks about the government, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, unless they could be considered a impediment to what the government wishes to accomplish,and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances as long as the government approves. the red desigantes the changes in question.