Leave it to the FAKE NEWS NYT to utilize some no-name, govmnt hack, to put out their propaganda.
Leave it to the FAKE NEWS NYT to utilize some no-name, govmnt hack, to put out their propaganda.
| |
One cannot allow citizens with a history of violence access to these weapons. 'Mentally Ill' may have been a little 'broad'.
Exactly.For the life of me I don't understand why we don't treat guns like we do cars.
Since regulations on cars, the deaths by cars has gone way down
And nobody is suggesting we get rid of all cars.
He's not a conservative on the issue of the second amendment is what I said.
To be conservative means you are traditional and averse to change or innovation - which is the opposite of being liberal - which means you are open to change and willing to discard traditional values.
So if he's arguing for change and the discarding of tradition (i.e. repealing the second amendment) then he is clearly not conservative on this issue.
As to whether or not the majority of his political views are conservative or liberal I haven't a clue.
Let me try this again:
He is not conservative on the issue of the second amendment. That is simply a fact.
No one is conservative on every issue or liberal on every issue.
No one said it was still 1776. And like I just got done telling you - I am not familiar enough with this individual to say whether or not the majority of his political views are conservative or liberal. What I do know is that his position on the second amendment is not conservative.
Now he may very well be conservative on other issues. But that really has nothing to do with what I posted.
Last edited by Jeremy; 9th October 2017 at 09:01 PM.
So if he's not "conservative" on the gun issue - why do 90% of the people in this country support background checks?
Just like liberals, not all conservatives agree in lockstep on all issues.
You do know that right? I have conservative friends that support gay rights and some gun restrctions. Last time I checked, that did not take away their "conservative leaning" credentials.
I already explained to you why he was not conservative on the gun issue.
Because to be conservative on an issue means you are traditional and averse to change or innovation - which is the opposite of being liberal on an issue- which means you are open to change and willing to discard traditional values.
I'm aware not all conservatives agree in lockstep on all the issues. I just got done telling you that. Here I'll repeat it again for you:
And I said nothing about taking away anyone's "conservative leaning" credentials - so God only knows why you decided to put such a phrase in quotes as if I had said them. In fact I just got done telling you the opposite - and that I have no idea what the majority of his political views are. They could very well be conservative I told you (refer to the second bold portion of my last post).
All that I said.... again - is that this individual is not conservative on the issue of the second amendment. And that is just a fact.
Last edited by Jeremy; 9th October 2017 at 09:22 PM.