Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 140
Thanks Tree62Thanks

Thread: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climat

  1. #31
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    59,871
    Thanks
    3942

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunchboxxy View Post
    Again, that "report" isn't peer reviewed. It doesn't appear in any academic journal.
    The OP says it is. I Guess you can prove it is not peer reviewed

  2. #32
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    59,871
    Thanks
    3942

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    The 'paper' linked in your OP is NOT peer-reviewed, and the 'facts' it reported were just blown up in your FACE by the link I gave you. There has been NO pause in global warming. If anything, the evidence says that global warming is ACCELERATING.

    You're just not very good at sensing when your claims have been blown up right in front of you.
    The OP says it is peer reviewed

    https://thsresearch.files.wordpress....ort-062717.pdf

  3. #33
    Southern Strategy Liberal OldGaffer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    35,829
    Thanks
    37896

    From
    Nashville, TN
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    Ask Doctor Colt to check it for you....

  4. #34
    El Psy Kongroo Lunchboxxy's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,216
    Thanks
    11162

    From
    Oregon
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    The OP says it is. I Guess you can prove it is not peer reviewed
    I already did. It isn't published in a peer reviewed journal. Ta da.

    Feel free to link to the academic journal where it is published at anytime to prove me wrong

  5. #35
    RNG
    RNG is offline
    Moderator RNG's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    7,394
    Thanks
    4451

    From
    Canada, West Coast
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    Oh you are misunderstanding me.

    The people who do the formal peer review are really irrelevant. Generally nobody knows who they are because they are kept anonymous. You rarely discover their names or how many there are because its all controlled by the editors.

    The editors decide which papers will get sent out, who and how many people they allow to read it, and whether or not to use any of the particular reviewers comments or to ignore them. Its the editor that controls the peer review, not the guys reading the paper and giving their comments, those guys are only an additional source for the editors to consider.

    It is the editors that conduct the actual peer review.

    For example, I tried to get on the list as a formal peer reviewer for two journals and if I had been accepted I would have periodically been sent work or pieces of work to read over and give comments on regarding whether the research appeared valid. The editors may tell me who is trying to publish, what the overall subject matter is or they may not, I only comment on what they would send me and they are in no way bound to base their decisions off of what I say.

    It's like asking your buddy to read your dissertation and tell you what he thinks of it before you present it to your panel for defense, the guys that will actually tell you if its acceptable or not.

    Sometimes editors will send out papers or parts of them but they aren't required to, only if they want clarification on a part they need to comment on that they may not have the expertise to answer themselves.

    The editors right the acceptance or denial of all peer reviews for their publication, nobody from the outside.
    They are not kept anonymous. And in fact of the four journals I have published in, three of them gave you a list of reviewers and all of them had all communication between the researcher, the journal and the reviewer open to all three parties. Twice a reviewer objected to a part of my paper and we discussed it through this somewhat time consuming channel.

    However, in this case, just by yourself a domain name, publish bullshit and you don.t have to worry about picky things like experts telling you your paper is bullshit. I's way simpler, easier and faster, if a little more expensive. But when you have Exxon and the Kochs funding you, who cares.
    Thanks from Lunchboxxy and Dangermouse

  6. #36
    El Psy Kongroo Lunchboxxy's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,216
    Thanks
    11162

    From
    Oregon
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    That's not a journal. That's just a file publishing site.

    The OP could say I was the queen of England but that would still require proof.
    Thanks from Dangermouse, BigLeRoy and tnbskts

  7. #37
    RNG
    RNG is offline
    Moderator RNG's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    7,394
    Thanks
    4451

    From
    Canada, West Coast
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    The OP says it is. I Guess you can prove it is not peer reviewed
    And I can say I'm way more powerful than Trump. But saying it doesn't make it a fact.

  8. #38
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    59,871
    Thanks
    3942

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunchboxxy View Post
    I already did. It isn't published in a peer reviewed journal. Ta da.

    Feel free to link to the academic journal where it is published at anytime to prove me wrong
    I just showed a link yet you show nothing you just spew useless opinions

  9. #39
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    59,871
    Thanks
    3942

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunchboxxy View Post
    That's not a journal. That's just a file publishing site.

    The OP could say I was the queen of England but that would still require proof.

    Read the link and notice all the scientist that agree. That would be peer review

  10. #40
    Wrinkly Member Dangermouse's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    20,604
    Thanks
    18350

    From
    Sunny Bournemouth, Dorset
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    I just showed a link yet you show nothing you just spew useless opinions
    Your link was shit. Could you not tell?

Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Study finds autism link
    By bajisima in forum Current Events
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12th June 2015, 12:11 PM
  2. Study finds honesty is healthy
    By Divine Wind in forum Healthcare
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 19th November 2012, 08:55 AM
  3. Study finds GOP men and women more feminine in looks
    By Seraphima in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 9th October 2012, 12:57 PM
  4. New study finds that racists are stupid
    By zitiboy in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 31st January 2012, 10:00 AM
  5. Uninsured More Likely to Die, Study Finds
    By Bourne in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 23rd September 2009, 04:09 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed