Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 140
Thanks Tree62Thanks

Thread: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climat

  1. #1
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    58,012
    Thanks
    3805

    Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climat

    It appears all warming is caused by data manipulation

    Study Targets Adjusted Climate Data | The Daily Caller

    A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”

    “Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a study published June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician.

    The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments.

    Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend.


    Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources.




    In fact, almost all the surface temperature warming adjustments cool past temperatures and warm more current records, increasing the warming trend, according to the study’s authors.

    “Nearly all of the warming they are now showing are in the adjustments,” Meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, a study co-author, told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview. “Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.”

    “You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,” said D’Aleo, who co-authored the study with statistician James Wallace and Cato Institute climate scientist Craig Idso.

    Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”

  2. #2
    Galactic Ruler Spookycolt's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2012
    Posts
    49,507
    Thanks
    9204

    From
    By the wall
    Doesn't matter.

    If the earth heats up its because of climate change, if it cools down it's because of climate change if its stays the same its because of climate change.

    Ask a liberal what the earth would be like if there were no climate change and they just get this stupid look on their face and a little drool of spittle runs down their chin as they try and process that thought.
    Thanks from ptif219

  3. #3
    Veteran Member cpicturetaker12's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    18,414
    Thanks
    14009

    From
    Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    It appears all warming is caused by data manipulation

    Study Targets Adjusted Climate Data | The Daily Caller
    The DAILY CALLER???
    Thanks from Friday13

  4. #4
    RNG
    RNG is offline
    Moderator RNG's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    5,342
    Thanks
    3652

    From
    Canada, West Coast
    The authors are: A chemtrailsplanet.net denizen, and two Heartland Institute favorites.

    And they write a "paper" and self publish it on a web domain they paid for by themselves.

    Not too impressive at all.

    If their work was any good, why do you think they would pay money to publish it rather than submit it to a peer reviewed journal?

  5. #5
    Galactic Ruler Spookycolt's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2012
    Posts
    49,507
    Thanks
    9204

    From
    By the wall
    Quote Originally Posted by RNG View Post
    The authors are: A chemtrailsplanet.net denizen, and two Heartland Institute favorites.

    And they write a "paper" and self publish it on a web domain they paid for by themselves.

    Not too impressive at all.

    If their work was any good, why do you think they would pay money to publish it rather than submit it to a peer reviewed journal?
    Because peer-reviews are biased.

    At least on this subject.

  6. #6
    RNG
    RNG is offline
    Moderator RNG's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    5,342
    Thanks
    3652

    From
    Canada, West Coast
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    Because peer-reviews are biased.

    At least on this subject.
    No. You have talked about this but have displayed no evidence or even data tending to imply that.
    Thanks from Friday13

  7. #7
    Galactic Ruler Spookycolt's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2012
    Posts
    49,507
    Thanks
    9204

    From
    By the wall
    Quote Originally Posted by RNG View Post
    No. You have talked about this but have displayed no evidence or even data tending to imply that.
    Give me any journal that peer-reviews and I will tell you who on their staff conducts them.

    On climate change that is, they have different reviewers for different subjects, some editors do multiple subjects though.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member EnigmaO01's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,859
    Thanks
    8114

    From
    Indiana
    A Phd pooh poohs peer reviews? Now I know he has no Phd.

  9. #9
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    58,012
    Thanks
    3805

    Quote Originally Posted by cpicturetaker12 View Post
    The DAILY CALLER???
    So the peer review does not matter only your bias view of the source. You show you don't care about truth and facts

  10. #10
    Veteran Member ptif219's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    58,012
    Thanks
    3805

    Quote Originally Posted by RNG View Post
    The authors are: A chemtrailsplanet.net denizen, and two Heartland Institute favorites.

    And they write a "paper" and self publish it on a web domain they paid for by themselves.

    Not too impressive at all.

    If their work was any good, why do you think they would pay money to publish it rather than submit it to a peer reviewed journal?
    It is peer review something you liberals say make it true

Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Study finds autism link
    By bajisima in forum Current Events
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12th June 2015, 12:11 PM
  2. Study finds honesty is healthy
    By Divine Wind in forum Healthcare
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 19th November 2012, 08:55 AM
  3. Study finds GOP men and women more feminine in looks
    By Seraphima in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 9th October 2012, 12:57 PM
  4. New study finds that racists are stupid
    By zitiboy in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 31st January 2012, 10:00 AM
  5. Uninsured More Likely to Die, Study Finds
    By Bourne in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 23rd September 2009, 04:09 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed