Page 5 of 24 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 233
Thanks Tree114Thanks

Thread: No gender classification for children will help pedophiles

  1. #41
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,568
    Thanks
    416

    From
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    So, when you google "the Left want to remove gender from children" (sic),
    It’s ‘Google’, and “the Left want to remove gender from children” was not a sentence, and thus requires no reference to [sic], which should be in square brackets anyway. It was a collection of words assembled to elicit certain search results. You don’t require good grammar for assembling such search terms. For instance, I might Google ‘horse Train WHEN they tommato’, which would make a very silly sentence, but would be fine to use as a search depending on what I was searching for. I know this isn’t easy, but try and keep up anyway.


    you get a bunch of nutters who can't decide if their babies are boys or girls.
    You get many references to these nutters, and they are all Leftists. Feminists and Democrats in great numbers have been working on this for decades now.


    OK, then, now we know who the "zany Left" is. Can't be more than a dozen or so of them in North America.
    There are millions, especially since I’m naturally including voters who vote for such people.


    and then, pedophiles are going to say, "Are you a boy or a girl? Say, let me check and see!" just before an angry parent knocks his block off. Sure.
    That’s correct. So once again, removing children’s gender from their paperwork (health cards, passports, I.D., birth certificates, etc) will cause many things to happen. I could list dozens of effects. In this particular case I referring to just one; the fact that pedophiles will gain more opportunities to molest children.

  2. #42
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,568
    Thanks
    416

    From
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    Okay. Not sure that your OP was "protecting kids".
    From the OP:

    "The zany Left want children born without their gender being assigned, which will escalate child molestation and make paedophiles very happy."

    Alerting society to this is 'protecting kids' by definition.

  3. #43
    Established Member
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    5,563
    Thanks
    4311

    From
    In my mind
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    From the OP:

    "The zany Left want children born without their gender being assigned, which will escalate child molestation and make paedophiles very happy."

    Alerting society to this is 'protecting kids' by definition.
    That is an illogical conclusion based on fantasy
    Thanks from labrea and Blues63

  4. #44
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,568
    Thanks
    416

    From
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    That is an illogical conclusion based on fantasy
    That's what the Leftist bureaucrats will say, for sure. That's why they'll press on. After years of the aforementioned molesting, some dickhead will discover that the gender-less approach was increasing molestation, and detail it, and 60 Minutes, Time and CNN will reveal the 'awful scandal', as though they are the heroes coming to rescue the kids. The experiment will end, and gender will be reinstated, but millions of kids will have been damaged.

  5. #45
    Established Member
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    5,563
    Thanks
    4311

    From
    In my mind
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    That's what the Leftist bureaucrats will say, for sure. That's why they'll press on. After years of the aforementioned molesting, some dickhead will discover that the gender-less approach was increasing molestation, and detail it, and 60 Minutes, Time and CNN will reveal the 'awful scandal', as though they are the heroes coming to rescue the kids. The experiment will end, and gender will be reinstated, but millions of kids will have been damaged.


    That is just so made up.
    Thanks from Davocrat and Blues63

  6. #46
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    10,486
    Thanks
    4787

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    It’s ‘Google’, and “the Left want to remove gender from children” was not a sentence, and thus requires no reference to [sic], which should be in square brackets anyway. It was a collection of words assembled to elicit certain search results. You don’t require good grammar for assembling such search terms. For instance, I might Google ‘horse Train WHEN they tommato’, which would make a very silly sentence, but would be fine to use as a search depending on what I was searching for. I know this isn’t easy, but try and keep up anyway.




    You get many references to these nutters, and they are all Leftists. Feminists and Democrats in great numbers have been working on this for decades now.




    There are millions, especially since I’m naturally including voters who vote for such people.




    That’s correct. So once again, removing children’s gender from their paperwork (health cards, passports, I.D., birth certificates, etc) will cause many things to happen. I could list dozens of effects. In this particular case I referring to just one; the fact that pedophiles will gain more opportunities to molest children.
    No one is removing gender from health cards, passports, and certainly not from birth certificates.
    There aren't "millions" of them. There may be a dozen tops.
    There is no evidence that they are "leftists," nor is there a definition of that term.
    Thanks from Blues63

  7. #47
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,568
    Thanks
    416

    From
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    No one is removing gender from health cards, passports, and certainly not from birth certificates.
    I said, in the OP, “The zany Left want children born without their gender being assigned, which will escalate child molestation and make paedophiles very happy.”

    You have changed that to “they are removing…”

    Try reading before responding.

    There aren't "millions" of them.
    There are indeed millions of them.

    There may be a dozen tops.
    In your dreams. There are more than a dozen in the pub down the road from me.

    There is no evidence that they are "leftists,"
    You won’t find conservatives supporting this, only wild eyed ranting Lefties.

    nor is there a definition of that term.
    There are plenty of terms. One is ‘gender free’, another is ‘non-gender-specific’. Another is ‘gender designation removal’. Others include ‘gender unknown’, ‘gender undetermined’ and ‘gender unassigned’, not to mention ‘gender reassignment’, ‘gender neutral’, ‘gender nonconforming’, ‘gender equality’, ‘gender dysphoria’ and of course, ‘gender free’, ‘transgender’, etc.

    No definitions, my bald, hairless arse.

  8. #48
    Veteran Member Panzareta's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    29,869
    Thanks
    17837

    From
    On a happy trail
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    I said, in the OP, “The zany Left want children born without their gender being assigned, which will escalate child molestation and make paedophiles very happy.”

    You have changed that to “they are removing…”

    Try reading before responding.


    There are indeed millions of them.


    In your dreams. There are more than a dozen in the pub down the road from me.



    You won’t find conservatives supporting this, only wild eyed ranting Lefties.



    There are plenty of terms. One is ‘gender free’, another is ‘non-gender-specific’. Another is ‘gender designation removal’. Others include ‘gender unknown’, ‘gender undetermined’ and ‘gender unassigned’, not to mention ‘gender reassignment’, ‘gender neutral’, ‘gender nonconforming’, ‘gender equality’, ‘gender dysphoria’ and of course, ‘gender free’, ‘transgender’, etc.

    No definitions, my bald, hairless arse.
    Have another round of DDT on me.
    Thanks from Blues63

  9. #49
    Master political analyst Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    10,486
    Thanks
    4787

    From
    The formerly great golden state
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    I said, in the OP, “The zany Left want children born without their gender being assigned, which will escalate child molestation and make paedophiles very happy.”

    You have changed that to “they are removing…”

    Try reading before responding.


    There are indeed millions of them.


    In your dreams. There are more than a dozen in the pub down the road from me.



    You won’t find conservatives supporting this, only wild eyed ranting Lefties.



    There are plenty of terms. One is ‘gender free’, another is ‘non-gender-specific’. Another is ‘gender designation removal’. Others include ‘gender unknown’, ‘gender undetermined’ and ‘gender unassigned’, not to mention ‘gender reassignment’, ‘gender neutral’, ‘gender nonconforming’, ‘gender equality’, ‘gender dysphoria’ and of course, ‘gender free’, ‘transgender’, etc.

    No definitions, my bald, hairless arse.
    What a bizarre parallel universe you live in in which there are dozens of leftists in the local pub who want babies born without gender identification and millions of wild eyed lefties who want the same thing, and in which pedophiles examine children to see what gender they are.

    Here in this parallel universe, the one we like to think of as the "real world," none of that is true.
    Thanks from Blues63

  10. #50
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,568
    Thanks
    416

    From
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    none of that is true.
    So you keep saying. Google is your friend. Nobody is forcing you to stay under your woodpile, with your eyes closed.

Page 5 of 24 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Executive Order 13526- Original Classification Authority
    By Constitutional Sheepdog in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 9th September 2016, 01:44 AM
  2. Protecting Pedophiles
    By patrickt in forum Current Events
    Replies: 144
    Last Post: 10th April 2015, 01:37 PM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 27th September 2014, 10:05 AM
  4. Political Classification
    By Morgan in forum Opinion Polls
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 1st October 2010, 02:15 PM
  5. Another Look at the VP's Classification Authority
    By michaelr in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2nd July 2007, 05:31 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed