Members banned from this thread: The Man


Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 137
Thanks Tree117Thanks

Thread: Canadian Politician responds to hate with love courage

  1. #41
    Cat-tastic Babba's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    63,649
    Thanks
    44143

    From
    So. Md.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    What's even more scary than radical muslim terrorists is what the left would do to Christians if they could get away with it.
    The only thing I want to do to Christians is keep their religion out of my government as I want ALL religion kept out of my government.
    Thanks from labrea

  2. #42
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    22,625
    Thanks
    6387

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    What's even more scary than radical muslim terrorists is what the left would do to Christians if they could get away with it.
    That is probably the very reason they support these islamist.

  3. #43
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    22,625
    Thanks
    6387

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Babba View Post
    The only thing I want to do to Christians is keep their religion out of my government as I want ALL religion kept out of my government.
    Except for sharia, right?

  4. #44
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    22,625
    Thanks
    6387

    From
    Great State of Texas

  5. #45
    New Member Idiocracat's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    723
    Thanks
    566

    From
    U.S.A.
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    iFunny.com

    Awesome source.
    You win the interwebs!
    Thanks from Dangermouse and Babba

  6. #46
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    29,040
    Thanks
    23119

    From
    On a hill
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    I wonder if the family of Martin Richard have a delusional fear of Christians?
    Christian terrorist have carried out attacks in the US - you just choose to not acknowledge it.

    Contemporary American Christian terrorism can be motivated by a violent desire to implement a Reconstructionist or Dominionist ideology.[103] Dominion Theology insists that Christians are called by God to (re)build society on Christian values to subjugate the earth and establish dominion over all things, as a prerequisite for the second coming of Christ.[104] Political violence motivated by dominion theology is a violent extension of the desire to impose a select version of Christianity on other Christians, as well as on non-Christians.

    At least 11 people have been killed in attacks on abortion clinics in the United States since 1993. After 1981, members of groups such as the Army of God began attacking abortion clinics and doctors across the United States.[105][106][107] A number of terrorist attacks were attributed by Bruce Hoffman to individuals and groups with ties to the Christian Identity and Christian Patriot movements, including the Lambs of Christ.[108] A group called Concerned Christians was deported from Israel on suspicion of planning to attack holy sites in Jerusalem at the end of 1999; they believed that their deaths would "lead them to heaven".[109][110]

    Eric Robert Rudolph carried out the Centennial Olympic Park bombing in 1996, as well as subsequent attacks on an abortion clinic and a lesbian nightclub. Michael Barkun, a professor at Syracuse University, considers Rudolph to likely fit the definition of a Christian terrorist. James A. Aho, a professor at Idaho State University, argues that religious considerations inspired Rudolph only in part.[111]

    Terrorism scholar Aref M. Al-Khattar has listed The Covenant, The Sword, and the Arm of the Lord (CSA), Defensive Action, the Montana Freemen, and some "Christian militia" as groups that "can be placed under the category of far-right-wing terrorism" that "has a religious (Christian) component".[112]

    In 1996 three men—Charles Barbee, Robert Berry and Jay Merelle—were charged with two bank robberies and bombings at the banks, a Spokane newspaper, and a Planned Parenthood office in Washington State. The men were anti-Semitic Christian Identity theorists who believed that God wanted them to carry out violent attacks and that such attacks would hasten the ascendancy of the Aryan race.[113] Wikipedia
    So the threat from Christian terrorists is delusional - huh.

    The KKK is another Christian hate group with history of terrorism.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
    Last edited by labrea; 10th September 2017 at 09:17 PM.
    Thanks from Babba

  7. #47
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    29,040
    Thanks
    23119

    From
    On a hill
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    That is probably the very reason they support these islamist.
    It seems like you have no problem with religion in government - as long as it's your religion. Sounds like hypocrisy to me.
    Thanks from Dangermouse and Babba

  8. #48
    Veteran Member Eve1's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    12,648
    Thanks
    8306

    From
    My own world
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Why is it when anyone questions the support of sharia, they are automatically branded a hater ... an islamaphobe?

    Islamophobia is a term created by the muslim brotherhood and CAIR to shut down the speech of anyone who questions their agendas.

    The very fact that Singh used these terms in response leads me to suspect there was a reason the heckler accused this Sikh of supporting sharia and backing the muslim brotherhood.
    John, your only problem is he doesn't support Sharia law. The man isn't muslim and Sikh's don't have any such thing. Mr. Singh didn't feel the need to tell the lady he wasn't Muslim because by stating it to her he would have implied that there is something wrong with being Muslim and also may have given the impression or implied all Muslims themselves support Sharia law, which is not the case.

    May I suggest you go back to my post #2 because I did some research and this lady didn't get very much right about this man. It seems she couldn't get passed him wearing his turbin and assumed the rest.
    Last edited by Eve1; 10th September 2017 at 10:45 AM.
    Thanks from labrea, Dangermouse, Babba and 1 others

  9. #49
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    22,625
    Thanks
    6387

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Eve1 View Post
    John, your only problem is he doesn't support Sharia law. The man isn't muslim and Sikh's don't have any such thing. Mr. Singh didn't feel the need to tell her he wasn't Muslim because by stating it to her he would have implied that there is something wrong with being Muslim and implied that all Muslims themselves support Sharia law which is not the case.
    That may be true ....

    But, as the heckler explained in the youtube video you posted, she was not questioning if he was muslim ans she was aware that he was Sikh.

    She was questioning his pro-sharia and pro-muslim brotherhood policies specifically .... a topic Mr. Singh conveniently avoided by playing the victim of islamophobia card.

    That .... along with his pro-sharia, pro-muslim brotherhood policies that the heckler mentioned, leads me to believe the heckler was spot on.

  10. #50
    Veteran Member Eve1's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    12,648
    Thanks
    8306

    From
    My own world
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    That may be true ....

    But, as the heckler explained in the youtube video you posted, she was not questioning if he was muslim ans she was aware that he was Sikh.

    She was questioning his pro-sharia and pro-muslim brotherhood policies specifically .... a topic Mr. Singh conveniently avoided by playing the victim of islamophobia card.

    That .... along with his pro-sharia, pro-muslim brotherhood policies that the heckler mentioned, leads me to believe the heckler was spot on.
    What pro-sharia law and what pro-Muslim brotherhood policies? I am trying to tell you the lady didn't know what the hell she was talking about.

    The man opposes a law that bares people from wearing head coverings (any head coverings). Of course he would his religion requires he wear a turbin. Just like a Jew requires it and so on and so forth. This law would make these people take it off or they would not be able to work for the gov't or recieve gov't services.

    I am totally confused about the pro-muslim brotherhood policies. What the hell are they? The man did not opposed a bill abolishing blasphemy he opposed a bill by the same name but that had to do with something similar to the Patriot Act. His whole party opposed it because it was too wide sweeping in terms of gov't intrusion into peoples lives.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-terrorism_Act,_2015

    The Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 (also known as Bill C-51) is an Act of the Parliament of Canada passed by the Harper government that broadened the authority of Canadian government agencies to share information about individuals easily. It is equivalent to the sweeping powers granted to the United States National Security Agency, to monitor the activities of all global netizens, allegedly "in the name of national security". It also expanded the mandate of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS),[7] and was described as the first comprehensive reform of this kind since 2001.[8]

    The bill was introduced and passed by the Conservative government of then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The Liberal Party supported the bill, although promising to amend the bill to increase oversight if elected. It was opposed by the Green Party of Canada, the Bloc Québecois, Strength in Democracy, and the New Democratic Party, which filibustered Parliament to increase the time allocated to expert witness testimony on the bill.

    The Trudeau government introduced 6 June 2017 another Bill C-51 amending the Criminal Code; it is a weakness of the naming conventions that have grown up around the Canadian Parliament that distinct bills are refenced by similar titles.[9] New rules concerning trials for sexual assault have been criticized as "a scandalous reversal of the traditional understanding that the burden of proof of guilt lies upon the Crown."[10] This Bill C-51 is not the same as the Anti-Terrorism Act, 2015.
    Last edited by Eve1; 10th September 2017 at 09:45 AM.

Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Corporations Love Canadian Health Care.
    By MaryAnne in forum Economics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2nd June 2017, 03:05 AM
  2. Hi from the state you love to hate.
    By Osama bin Lawn Gnome in forum New Users
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 24th July 2015, 03:25 AM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 20th February 2015, 03:02 PM
  4. Something You Love, Something You Hate
    By Charles Stover in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 18th July 2010, 03:01 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed