Members banned from this thread: Reality


Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 76
Thanks Tree61Thanks

Thread: LGBT politics and pedophile advocacy - a history

  1. #51
    Telecastin' Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,117
    Thanks
    4020

    From
    Brisbane, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    I know what it tells me. That you thanked Spookycolt. A guy who has opinions just like everyone else. I think @Reality is a lot closer to the truth than you or Spookycolt believe.
    Read the legislation. Reality is off his rocker.

  2. #52
    New Member Pureinheart's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    376
    Thanks
    85

    From
    USA
    Quote Originally Posted by Madeline View Post
    Do you read your linked articles? California might have immunized the child sex worker from arrest.

    It did no such thing for the pimp or the john. Since they are the abusers of these kids, it is appropriate to redirect our law enforcement efforts towards them.

    Arresting victims will never reduce child sex trafficking.

    I want to like Wash Times. This country badly needs a conservative newspaper. But this article illustrates the horrendous bias that prompts them to abandon journalism for propaganda.
    I decided to word my post different- thus edited. My comprehension leaves a lot to be desired at times, although the linked article is not propaganda. It clearly defines the outcome of decriminalization which removes them/kids as being victims, making it ok to prostitute them out. We have to remember these kids most likely have been brainwashed... child trafficking is very real and I think it's a shame I even have to communicate this.
    Last edited by Pureinheart; 9th October 2017 at 09:48 PM.
    Thanks from Rob Larrikin

  3. #53
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    21,756
    Thanks
    3636

    From
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by Blues63 View Post
    Read the legislation. Reality is off his rocker.
    I'm curious - but would you consider saying that a certain poster is off his rocker to be questioning his mental health?

    Because I looked up the phrase (just to be sure) and it certainly seems that way to me.

  4. #54
    Telecastin' Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,117
    Thanks
    4020

    From
    Brisbane, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy View Post
    I'm curious - but would you consider saying that a certain poster is off his rocker to be questioning his mental health?

    Because I looked up the phrase (just to be sure) and it certainly seems that way to me.
    Yes, the claims made by the OP are insane. Read the legislation.
    Last edited by Blues63; 9th October 2017 at 09:49 PM.

  5. #55
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    21,756
    Thanks
    3636

    From
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by Blues63 View Post
    Yes, the claims made by the OP are insane. Read the legislation.
    Ok.

    That's what I thought you were saying. I just wanted to make sure. ^^

  6. #56
    Telecastin' Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,117
    Thanks
    4020

    From
    Brisbane, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy View Post
    Ok.

    That's what I thought you were saying. I just wanted to make sure. ^^
    If one is spruiking nonsense or making absurd and outrageous claims, one is 'off his rocker'. Go to the posting history. Most of his claims are absurd, irrational or just plain insane. There's a lot of it about lately with conspiracy theories, the manipulation of terms to suit, the outright banality of many claims and cases.

    As I write, there are four threads in the sidebar that are just looney tunes and that's all folks!

    I think we should just hand this site over to the nutters and leave it.
    Last edited by Blues63; 9th October 2017 at 09:54 PM.

  7. #57
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    21,756
    Thanks
    3636

    From
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by Blues63 View Post
    If one is spruiking nonsense or making absurd and outrageous claims, one is 'off his rocker'. Go to the posting history. Most of his claims are absurd, irrational or just plain insane. There's a lot of it about lately with conspiracy theories, the manipulation of terms to suit, the outright banality of many claims and cases.

    I think we should just hand this site over to the nutters and leave it.
    Considering he was banned from this own thread and trolled relentlessly without consequence I would say that the odds of him taking over this site are pretty slim.

    So I wouldn't worry about that.
    Thanks from Rob Larrikin

  8. #58
    Telecastin' Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,117
    Thanks
    4020

    From
    Brisbane, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy View Post
    Considering he was banned from this own thread and trolled relentlessly without consequence I would say that the odds of him taking over this site are pretty slim.
    'Nutters' is plural. There are many more where he came from. Three alone in the sidebar as I write.

  9. #59
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    21,756
    Thanks
    3636

    From
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by Blues63 View Post
    'Nutters' is plural. There are many more where he came from. Three alone in the sidebar as I write.
    I'm not sure which nutters you are referring so I'll refrain from further commenting about it.
    Last edited by Jeremy; 9th October 2017 at 10:04 PM.

  10. #60
    Telecastin' Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,117
    Thanks
    4020

    From
    Brisbane, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy View Post
    I'm not sure which nutters you are referring so I'll refrain from further commenting about it.
    Fair enough, but if one opens all the threads it should immediately be apparent.



    This is the legislation that all the hysteria regarding child prostitution is about:

    https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...01520160SB1322

    Note, it doesn't evince the connotations being explored in the thread.

    Now, the OP has made even more radical and irrational claims by suggesting that the far left supports NAMBLA (through a convoluted process). That is absurd and if it were true (not just on some fuckwit's boobytooby video) it would be the scandal of the century would it not?

    I mean, if one was going to break such a story, would you not use something a little more reputable and credible? Do you not agree that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence?

    I really wish youtube was taken out of the debate environment but there it is. The most unreliable and irrational noise is becoming mainstream, and now the mainstream media is beginning to ape boobytooby with its content being more emotive than factual.

    Note the following from the OP:

    Interesting video that exposes the history of far-left and LGBT activist organizations and their support of "pedophile rights" groups like NAMBLA - and how modern "trans rights" movements targeting children may be a front for introducing pedophile acceptance to children.... creepy stuff... which just shows how dangerous and insidious the far-left really is, and why society should be much more worried about them than mythical "Nazis" who don't really exist:

    How much extreme noise can one fit into a paragraph? Let's unpack this garbage:

    A video 'exposes' .... it doesn't actually.

    LGBT activist organizations and their support of "pedophile rights" groups like NAMBLA ...this is designed to misrepresent in order to elicit a response akin to outrage. The association has already been pointed out with evidence that this was the case back when NAMBLA didn't involve children. So you see the association is immediately false, and anachronistic.

    how modern "trans rights" movements targeting children may be a front for introducing pedophile acceptance to children...now using what we know this projection is far from the reality and reaching levels of absurdity. Trans movements aren't a front for pedophile groups. That would be another scandal that would transcend the depths of boobytooby, and it is absurd. That is merely hate and libel masquerading as an argument, but not a very well developed case. The projection is also anachronistic.

    and why society should be much more worried about them than mythical "Nazis" who don't really exist:....now we have the hysterical conclusion and chicken little stuff. An improbable possibility is now a fact. Did you notice the shift? And further to that, we have the outright lie that 'Nazi' sympathisers 'don't really exist'. I don't know about you, but that is a crock of shit to me as Fascist leanings are definitely on the rise, whether borne of anti-Semitism, anti-African American or anti-Arab sentiments, it is still here.

    So, it seems that the whole contention is a little unhinged and designed to influence those ignorant of the facts.
    Last edited by Blues63; 10th October 2017 at 12:35 AM.

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13th September 2016, 08:03 PM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 17th July 2016, 12:49 PM
  3. The Truth about LGBT People in Russian History
    By Kropotkin in forum World History
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 29th August 2013, 06:59 PM
  4. Politics/History Books on Iran
    By TheHangingChad in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8th September 2010, 11:02 AM
  5. My History Can Beat Up Your Politics
    By Nerdo in forum World History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24th March 2008, 12:20 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed