Members banned from this thread: Reality


Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 76
Thanks Tree61Thanks

Thread: LGBT politics and pedophile advocacy - a history

  1. #61
    Council Member Djinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    41,596
    Thanks
    26342

    From
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    The State of California doesn't define words. Society does. They are catalogued and listed in the references. Until they change yes, there are tens of thousands of child prostitutes, if not millions, in the world, and most are forced into being child prostitutes. Taking away the name 'prostitute' will only make it easier to subjugate them.
    Legal definitions are defined by legal bodies; not by society. If prostitution is a legally-defined crime, then "prostitute" has a legal definition. To the best of my knowledge, the crime of prostitution requires a measure of complicity on the part of the accused.

  2. #62
    Veteran Member Dr Sampson Simpson's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    21,262
    Thanks
    11626

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy View Post
    Considering he was banned from this own thread and trolled relentlessly without consequence I would say that the odds of him taking over this site are pretty slim.

    So I wouldn't worry about that.
    Oh my god, biggest whiner ever. Sorry you continually keep getting destroyed by facts, logic and reasoning

    yeah, its trolling to destroy the idiotic, flame baiting, homophobic bullshit of the OP. Stupid fucking trolls

  3. #63
    Veteran Member Pragmatist's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    45,217
    Thanks
    13117

    Quote Originally Posted by Reality View Post
    It's not a conspiracy theory when the groups actually exist. In fact, NAMBLA was at one point or another in the 1970s accepted as a legitimate part of the "LGBT rights movement":

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedoph...dvocacy_groups
    Do you think they are as bad as the far right marching around with their Nazi flags chanting that jews will not replace us?

  4. #64
    Veteran Member Pragmatist's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    45,217
    Thanks
    13117

    Quote Originally Posted by Reality View Post
    "Trans" is pseudo-science and medical quackery, and the majority of self-diagnosed "trans people" are just mentally confused individuals who'd never have even thought they were "trans" if they didn't read about "trans" on the internet.

    Pedo advocates use basically the same bad arguments as the fringe trans advocates do.
    How the fuck would you know? You are nothing but an ignorant homophobe and haven't a fucking clue how or why someone would be trans.

  5. #65
    Veteran Member Pragmatist's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    45,217
    Thanks
    13117

    Sorry, didn't see that he was banned. Hopefully from the site completely.

  6. #66
    Member Rob Larrikin's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,827
    Thanks
    321

    From
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Djinn View Post
    Legal definitions are defined by legal bodies; not by society. If prostitution is a legally-defined crime, then "prostitute" has a legal definition. To the best of my knowledge, the crime of prostitution requires a measure of complicity on the part of the accused.
    Plenty of mischievous feminist legislation was brought about to make words lose their original meaning, not for good legal reasons, but merely to make it easier to impugn, extort and imprison men. They would want the word ‘prostitutes’ to not be applicable to children for the simple reason that then men could not then defend themselves by pointing out that they were approached by a 15 year old prostitute. The jury won’t hear that word 'prostitute', so the man will have less chance of being acquitted. Here is how the difference will look in court – the before and after as far as the changing legal definition is concerned:

    Before:

    Lawyer: So you were walking along the street at night?
    Accused: Yes.
    Lawyer: And what did you see?
    Accused: A prostitute on the corner, in a minnie skirt.
    Lawyer: Why did you assume she was a prostitute?
    Accused: Cos I’d asked her before how much she charged.
    Lawyer: And how much did she say?
    Accused: She charged $20 for a BJ and $100 for everything.
    Lawyer: By ‘everything’ you mean sex, I presume?
    Accused: Yes.
    Lawyer: And then what happened?
    Accused: She smiled and asked me if I wanted to have some fun.
    Lawyer: And then?
    Accused: And then we went into her place, and up the stairs to have sex.

    After:

    Lawyer: So you were walking along the street at night?
    Accused: Yes.
    Lawyer: And what did you see?
    Accused: A… [looks at judge, who glares] um, a girl. I saw a girl on the corner.
    Lawyer: And then what happened?
    Accused: Ah, she… [judge glares] she said, hello. She said hello.
    Lawyer: And then what happened?
    Accused: And then we went into her place, and up the stairs.

    Finally, on the subject of definition, the word ‘prostitute’ does not include anything about age. If the legal definition sets an age and becomes familiar, it may eventually become the definition used by all references. If so it will be another ‘dumbing down’ of our language for political reasons. It hasn’t reached that stage yet. So the word is still as it was.

  7. #67
    Council Member Djinn's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    41,596
    Thanks
    26342

    From
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    ... Finally, on the subject of definition, the word ‘prostitute’ does not include anything about age. If the legal definition sets an age and becomes familiar, it may eventually become the definition used by all references. If so it will be another ‘dumbing down’ of our language for political reasons. It hasn’t reached that stage yet. So the word is still as it was.
    It does not include anything about age - but it requires a measure of consent for the legal charge to hold.

  8. #68
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    21,761
    Thanks
    3637

    From
    North Carolina
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Sampson Simpson View Post
    Oh my god, biggest whiner ever. Sorry you continually keep getting destroyed by facts, logic and reasoning

    yeah, its trolling to destroy the idiotic, flame baiting, homophobic bullshit of the OP. Stupid fucking trolls
    Speaking of trolling others without consquence: thanks for making my point for me.

    By the way - flame baiting is against the rules on this forum - and calling someone the biggest whiner ever certainly qualifies as a post designed to offend\anger\enrage other persons, so that they will send a flaming post in reply.

    So before you lecture others on trolling you may want to consider your own trolling in this regard.

    But I'm not going to bite and insult you back (as I should). At least not right now. I'll wait and see if anything is done about you first.
    Thanks from Rob Larrikin

  9. #69
    Member Rob Larrikin's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,827
    Thanks
    321

    From
    Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Djinn View Post
    It does not include anything about age - but it requires a measure of consent for the legal charge to hold.
    I'm not talking about the legal definition, only the definition. Legal definitions of words today can take a word anywhere. So far this one remains as is. When it does change, we'll see in in the normal references.

  10. #70
    Veteran Member carpe diem's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    26,840
    Thanks
    2468

    From
    San Diego, CA
    Quote Originally Posted by Spookycolt View Post
    There is plenty to dislike about these activist organizations but they are not supporting pedophilia.

    Neither does the far-left.

    The organizations that support it are specific to that cause, that is their goal and that certainly isn't the goal of any LBGT groups, they have other priorities.
    You must dismiss the simple fact that NAMBLA has utilized the left's silly arguments...and if you hate them you are in fact characterized by the left's silly standards, a bigot.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13th September 2016, 08:03 PM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 17th July 2016, 12:49 PM
  3. The Truth about LGBT People in Russian History
    By Kropotkin in forum World History
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 29th August 2013, 06:59 PM
  4. Politics/History Books on Iran
    By TheHangingChad in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8th September 2010, 11:02 AM
  5. My History Can Beat Up Your Politics
    By Nerdo in forum World History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24th March 2008, 12:20 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed