Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 75
Thanks Tree19Thanks

Thread: Peter Strzok

  1. #11
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,327
    Thanks
    6867

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Chief View Post
    Actually your suggestion makes no sense. If anything, it shows that Mueller is not going to allow any bias. It will make whatever his final case is, that much stronger because he had the integrity to remove someone who may have been doing fine work, but created the possible appearance of impropriety.
    What about that "possible appearance of impropriety"in the email probe?

    I believe Strzok was in charge of HRC's email probe.

    There are a helluva lot more questions surrounding HRC's email probe than this fabricated witch hunt against Trump.

  2. #12
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,327
    Thanks
    6867

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by DebateDrone View Post
    Thank God for small miracles. Someone tossed a drowning Trump a empty milk jug as a buoy.

    You treat Strzok as if he is the Coast Guard chopper coming to save Donald from the rough seas...no, Strzok is just an empty milk jug.
    Sure about that?

    It sounds like to me Strzok is the weak link that is about to bring this corrupt house of cards down.

  3. #13
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,327
    Thanks
    6867

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by pragmatic View Post
    Just not feeling the outrage here.

    Sounds like Mueller learned about a bad apple in the investigation and removed him from the equation.


    (From reports out, Strzok may not even be a field agent any longer. Re-assigned to the Human Resources department.)
    Are you purposely ignoring the fact that Strzock was in charge of HRC's email probe?

  4. #14
    Veteran Member DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    31,624
    Thanks
    26711

    From
    SWUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Ignoring the obvious conflict of interest here will not make it go away and I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it won't get Peter Strzok his job back on the witch hunt either.
    What federal statue states that only investigators from the same political party as the investigated get to investigate?

    I never heard of your so-firm standards when it was the Republican Congresses having investigations after investigations after investigation to bring down HRC's poll numbers.

    Where were your standards then?

  5. #15
    Veteran Member DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    31,624
    Thanks
    26711

    From
    SWUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Sure about that?

    It sounds like to me Strzok is the weak link that is about to bring this corrupt house of cards down.
    Weak link. He is your only hope.

    Keep hope alive.

  6. #16
    Veteran Member Chief's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    26,154
    Thanks
    6739

    From
    Earth
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    What about that "possible appearance of impropriety"in the email probe?

    I believe Strzok was in charge of HRC's email probe.

    There are a helluva lot more questions surrounding HRC's email probe than this fabricated witch hunt against Trump.
    I don't know what his role was in that, but I am pretty sure my position on Clinton's email server here at PH is well known. If he helped her to avoid responsibility, then that's simply another good reason to remove him, but does not change or excuse the various Trump team members from responsibility for their various actions.

  7. #17
    New Member Mister B's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    471

    From
    DS9
    At a minimum, this is at least the third thread on this. Can a mod merge them?

  8. #18
    Veteran Member Chief's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    26,154
    Thanks
    6739

    From
    Earth
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Sure about that?

    It sounds like to me Strzok is the weak link that is about to bring this corrupt house of cards down.
    https://www.bustle.com/p/who-is-pete...-texts-6764614

    According to the Times, Strzok was reassigned after the Justice Department’s inspector general discovered text messages on his phone that could be interpreted as critical of Trump. The inspector general’s office told the Times that the examination of the texts was part of a larger inquiry into how the FBI handled investigations surrounding the 2016 election.

    Reports suggest that Mueller, who ran the FBI from 2001 until 2013, knows any illusion that his team holds unfair political biases could sever the public’s trust in the investigation. As Politico noted back in October, the special counsel takes care to avoid speaking with the press, and stays out of the public eye.
    If anything, this action strengthens the so called "house of cards".

  9. #19
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,327
    Thanks
    6867

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by DebateDrone View Post
    What federal statue states that only investigators from the same political party as the investigated get to investigate?

    I never heard of your so-firm standards when it was the Republican Congresses having investigations after investigations after investigation to bring down HRC's poll numbers.

    Where were your standards then?
    Why was Strzok removed?

  10. #20
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,327
    Thanks
    6867

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Chief View Post
    I don't know what his role was in that, but I am pretty sure my position on Clinton's email server here at PH is well known. If he helped her to avoid responsibility, then that's simply another good reason to remove him, but does not change or excuse the various Trump team members from responsibility for their various actions.
    In light of this new information do you think a special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate HRC email probe?

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Peter Schiff at his best
    By muffins in forum Current Events
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th March 2010, 11:56 PM
  2. Peter Schiff
    By Zaragrunudgeyon in forum Economics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 1st December 2008, 09:27 PM
  3. Who is Peter Paul?
    By Ronin Tetsuro in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 6th June 2008, 07:09 PM
  4. Hello From Peter Parka
    By Peter Parka in forum New Users
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 4th September 2007, 10:00 PM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed