Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 75
Thanks Tree19Thanks

Thread: Peter Strzok

  1. #31
    Veteran Member Eve1's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    14,710
    Thanks
    9731

    From
    My own world
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The difference is the evidence.

    You can bet if Mueller had half the evidence on Trump that Comey had on HRC Trump would already have been impeached.

    But, there is no evidence of Russian collusion, nor will there ever be.

    There is evidence HRC broke the law.

    There is now evidence that there were clearly conflicts of interest in HRC's email probe.

    That is the difference.
    The Senate in its hearings is narrowing in on Trump and his administration for obstruction of justice. That piece of news came out today via Feinstein. The crime appears to be in the cover up of Contacts with Russia so even if collusion can not be proven it appears a crime has been committed regardless. BYE BYE TRUMP BYE BYE PENCE BYE BYE SESSIONS.
    Thanks from Mister B and MaryAnne

  2. #32
    the "good" prag pragmatic's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    28,959
    Thanks
    17503

    From
    between Moon and NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Are you purposely ignoring the fact that Strzock was in charge of HRC's email probe?
    Nope. If he misbehaved during that investigation it should he addressed.

    But it's a different topic/issue.

  3. #33
    the "good" prag pragmatic's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    28,959
    Thanks
    17503

    From
    between Moon and NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Why was Strzok removed?
    Pretty sure that has already been clearly established.

  4. #34
    the "good" prag pragmatic's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    28,959
    Thanks
    17503

    From
    between Moon and NYC
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The public trust in the FBI is destroyed.

    Strzok just offers proof that ALL these investigations have been compromised especially HRC's email probe.

    For the most part I believe the trust in the FBI is still pretty high.
    Thanks from Mister B and MaryAnne

  5. #35
    New Member Mister B's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    471

    From
    DS9
    Quote Originally Posted by pragmatic View Post
    For the most part I believe the trust in the FBI is still pretty high.
    Waaaay more than the presidency or congress.
    Thanks from MaryAnne

  6. #36
    Veteran Member Chief's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    26,154
    Thanks
    6739

    From
    Earth
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartanntp

    The head of FBI Agents Association fired back at President Trump's comments against the FBI Sunday, saying any suggestion that agents aren't dedicated to their jobs "is simply false."

    "Every day, FBI Special Agents put their lives on the line to protect the American public from national security and criminal threats. Agents perform these duties with unwavering integrity and professionalism and a focus on complying with the law and the Constitution," FBIAA head Thomas O'Connor said in a statement.

    "This is why the FBI continues to be the premier law enforcement agency in the world. FBI Agents are dedicated to their mission; suggesting otherwise is simply false."

  7. #37
    Veteran Member MaryAnne's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    44,961
    Thanks
    31962

    From
    Englewood,Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by pragmatic View Post
    Pretty sure that has already been clearly established.
    If John does not know why Peter was removed,why is he top posting about him? It is always helpful if you know what you are posting about.

    FBI agent removed from Mueller investigation over anti-Trump texts - CNNPolitics

  8. #38
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    46,435
    Thanks
    13567

    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller confirmed with Fox News on Saturday that agent Peter Strzok had been removed from Muellerís investigation into Russia collusion after the Justice Departmentís inspector general started examining Strzok's electronic messages with a colleague, which reportedly included ones that were anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton.

    Trump reloads on FBI's Clinton email probe, after reports of 'tainted' anti-Trump agent | Fox News

    So .... if Strzok is so tainted, that he can no longer work on the Trump witch hunt ..... errr ..... I mean the Russian collusion probe how is it that he was allowed to work on HRC's email probe?

    This is why a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to investigate not only HRC but, the investigators as well.

    It appears that this whole Democrat corrupt house of cards is about to come down.
    There will be no more Hillary investigations. That one is over, they found nothing and respectable republicans are embarrassed enough as it is they went after her in the first place. We are investigating this president now and his minions are dropping like flies. This is how you do an investigation, you catch bad guys.

  9. #39
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    46,435
    Thanks
    13567

    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The difference is the evidence.

    You can bet if Mueller had half the evidence on Trump that Comey had on HRC Trump would already have been impeached.

    But, there is no evidence of Russian collusion, nor will there ever be.

    There is evidence HRC broke the law.

    There is now evidence that there were clearly conflicts of interest in HRC's email probe.

    That is the difference.
    No there was no evidence she broke the law and that investigation is over. The current president has broken the law and has so much as admitted it.

  10. #40
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    46,435
    Thanks
    13567

    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Ignoring the obvious conflict of interest here will not make it go away and I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it won't get Peter Strzok his job back on the witch hunt either.
    It may be a witchhunt but we caught 4 of them already.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Peter Schiff at his best
    By muffins in forum Current Events
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th March 2010, 11:56 PM
  2. Peter Schiff
    By Zaragrunudgeyon in forum Economics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 1st December 2008, 09:27 PM
  3. Who is Peter Paul?
    By Ronin Tetsuro in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 6th June 2008, 07:09 PM
  4. Hello From Peter Parka
    By Peter Parka in forum New Users
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 4th September 2007, 10:00 PM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed