Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 75
Thanks Tree19Thanks

Thread: Peter Strzok

  1. #61
    Veteran Member Eve1's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    14,679
    Thanks
    9702

    From
    My own world
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    Wut
    I posted a complete sentence so if you don’t understand it that’s on you.

    FBI SHOULD HAVE SHUT UP ABOUT CLINTON INVESTIGATION during campaign and said nothing.

    FBI DID NOT DISCLOSE LOOKING INTO TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA during campaign and said nothing.

    THE ABOVE WAS UNFAIR AND UNEVEN treatment in favor of Trump by the FBI.

    The investigations themselves were done properly but disclosing them to the public was not done properly.
    Thanks from Chief

  2. #62
    Veteran Member Chief's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    26,148
    Thanks
    6738

    From
    Earth
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    I'm not sure which Alt Left Universe you're living in but, back here in reality, the FBI lost all credibility with the American people when James Comey stood up there and listed all of the laws HRC was in violation of and then stated that she would not be charged.

    The FBI has been 100% compromised and this Peter Strzok shill is just the latest proof of that fact.
    I guess anyone who doesn't parrot your exact view is alt-left then. So, is there any point in me putting any more effort in discussing this with you?

  3. #63
    Veteran Member Chief's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    26,148
    Thanks
    6738

    From
    Earth
    Quote Originally Posted by Eve1 View Post
    I posted a complete sentence so if you don’t understand it that’s on you.

    FBI SHOULD HAVE SHUT UP ABOUT CLINTON INVESTIGATION during campaign and said nothing.

    FBI DID NOT DISCLOSE LOOKING INTO TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA during campaign and said nothing.

    THE ABOVE WAS UNFAIR AND UNEVEN treatment in favor of Trump by the FBI.

    The investigations themselves were done properly but disclosing them to the public was not done properly.
    It was tricky though, because of when everything was coming out. You have info that the public needs to know, but its right before an election. Do you release it or not? Honestly I don't think there was any winning scenario for them. At the end of the day though, Clinton was at fault for creating that weakness that was exploited. Hopefully some smart people will figure out how we can protect the integrity of our system from misinformation campaigns.
    Thanks from HayJenn

  4. #64
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,270
    Thanks
    6860

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Eve1 View Post
    The percentage of people that donít realize they are victims of a large scale con by a conman Trump is only 30%. The rest that did vote for Trump that gave Trump the Presidency and the Congress and the Republicans a majority in the House and the Senate now realize they were conned. They will not repeat the same error and vote for Trump or Trumpís GOP.
    Do you click your heals when you recite that?

  5. #65
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,270
    Thanks
    6860

    From
    Great State of Texas
    How many more Peter Strzok's are on Mueller's team?

  6. #66
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    22,030
    Thanks
    4239

    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    How many more Peter Strzok's are on Mueller's team?
    Weissmann is sounding like a pile of %$#@^%$

    These are the lawyers on Robert Mueller's special counsel team https://www.cbsnews.com/news/these-a...-counsel-team/

  7. #67
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    22,030
    Thanks
    4239

    Quote Originally Posted by Chief View Post
    I think that "the public" trust in the FBI is mostly fine. Trump posted that the FBI's reputation was in tatters, so folks that are big on Trump seem to believe it. But, looking at actual information... Oops. I tried to find a chart showing FBI public approval over the years, but was not successful. I don't believe Trump's tweet though and suspect that our impression of the FBI is relatively stable over the years.
    Most of the rank and file likely are ok. Upper management is questionable. Stzrok is clear evidence of stain on the FBI. He was very instrumental in covering hillary's ass. Two of hillary's top aides were caught lying to the FBI and not a damn thing come of it. Flynn, now that's another matter. Mueller had Stzrok on his staff until the stain of it all became public, then Mueller cut him loose.
    Last edited by THOR; 5th December 2017 at 05:50 PM.

  8. #68
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,990
    Thanks
    437

    From
    Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller confirmed with Fox News on Saturday that agent Peter Strzok had been removed from Mueller’s investigation into Russia collusion after the Justice Department’s inspector general started examining Strzok's electronic messages with a colleague, which reportedly included ones that were anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton.

    Trump reloads on FBI's Clinton email probe, after reports of 'tainted' anti-Trump agent | Fox News

    So .... if Strzok is so tainted, that he can no longer work on the Trump witch hunt ..... errr ..... I mean the Russian collusion probe how is it that he was allowed to work on HRC's email probe?

    This is why a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to investigate not only HRC but, the investigators as well.

    It appears that this whole Democrat corrupt house of cards is about to come down.
    Why is it that Hillary's staff were given "no jeopardy" interviews? Partisanship maybe?
    Last edited by Otto Throttle; 5th December 2017 at 09:22 PM.

  9. #69
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    22,030
    Thanks
    4239

    Yea! she has friends in high places.

  10. #70
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,270
    Thanks
    6860

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Peter Strzok did not get fired for anti-Trump pro HRC text.

    Peter Strzok was removed because his hands are all over the pee pee dossier which was fabricated and paid for by HRC and used as real intelligence to obtain a FISA arrant to spy on the Trump campaign.

    Mueller's house of cards is collapsing.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Peter Schiff at his best
    By muffins in forum Current Events
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th March 2010, 11:56 PM
  2. Peter Schiff
    By Zaragrunudgeyon in forum Economics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 1st December 2008, 09:27 PM
  3. Who is Peter Paul?
    By Ronin Tetsuro in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 6th June 2008, 07:09 PM
  4. Hello From Peter Parka
    By Peter Parka in forum New Users
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 4th September 2007, 10:00 PM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed