Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 75
Thanks Tree19Thanks

Thread: Peter Strzok

  1. #1
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,270
    Thanks
    6860

    From
    Great State of Texas

    Peter Strzok

    The office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller confirmed with Fox News on Saturday that agent Peter Strzok had been removed from Muellerís investigation into Russia collusion after the Justice Departmentís inspector general started examining Strzok's electronic messages with a colleague, which reportedly included ones that were anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton.

    Trump reloads on FBI's Clinton email probe, after reports of 'tainted' anti-Trump agent | Fox News

    So .... if Strzok is so tainted, that he can no longer work on the Trump witch hunt ..... errr ..... I mean the Russian collusion probe how is it that he was allowed to work on HRC's email probe?

    This is why a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to investigate not only HRC but, the investigators as well.

    It appears that this whole Democrat corrupt house of cards is about to come down.

  2. #2
    Established Member
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    5,932
    Thanks
    4586

    From
    In my mind
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller confirmed with Fox News on Saturday that agent Peter Strzok had been removed from Mueller’s investigation into Russia collusion after the Justice Department’s inspector general started examining Strzok's electronic messages with a colleague, which reportedly included ones that were anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton.

    Trump reloads on FBI's Clinton email probe, after reports of 'tainted' anti-Trump agent | Fox News

    So .... if Strzok is so tainted, that he can no longer work on the Trump witch hunt ..... errr ..... I mean the Russian collusion probe how is it that he was allowed to work on HRC's email probe?

    This is why a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to investigate not only HRC but, the investigators as well.

    It appears that this whole Democrat corrupt house of cards is about to come down.
    Is this like all your other predictions about something destroying the democrats? You said the same thing about #metoo


    That being said, why is it you seem to be defending Trump against alleged witch hunts, but calling for them about other folks?
    Thanks from Dangermouse and Blues63

  3. #3
    Wrinkly Member Dangermouse's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    21,733
    Thanks
    19660

    From
    Sunny Bournemouth, Dorset
    How many bites at the same cherry? How is an agency biased when it fires staff for showing the claimed bias? He didn't even share it publicly but between colleagues!

  4. #4
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,270
    Thanks
    6860

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    Is this like all your other predictions about something destroying the democrats? You said the same thing about #metoo


    That being said, why is it you seem to be defending Trump against alleged witch hunts, but calling for them about other folks?
    The difference is the evidence.

    You can bet if Mueller had half the evidence on Trump that Comey had on HRC Trump would already have been impeached.

    But, there is no evidence of Russian collusion, nor will there ever be.

    There is evidence HRC broke the law.

    There is now evidence that there were clearly conflicts of interest in HRC's email probe.

    That is the difference.

  5. #5
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,270
    Thanks
    6860

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Dangermouse View Post
    How many bites at the same cherry? How is an agency biased when it fires staff for showing the claimed bias? He didn't even share it publicly but between colleagues!
    Ignoring the obvious conflict of interest here will not make it go away and I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it won't get Peter Strzok his job back on the witch hunt either.

  6. #6
    Established Member
    Joined
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    5,932
    Thanks
    4586

    From
    In my mind
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The difference is the evidence.

    You can bet if Mueller had half the evidence on Trump that Comey had on HRC Trump would already have been impeached.

    But, there is no evidence of Russian collusion, nor will there ever be.

    There is evidence HRC broke the law.

    There is now evidence that there were clearly conflicts of interest in HRC's email probe.

    That is the difference.
    See, that is all just biased opinion in the favor of complete exoneration of the fuckery of the president.

  7. #7
    Veteran Member John T Ford's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    25,270
    Thanks
    6860

    From
    Great State of Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Think for myself View Post
    See, that is all just biased opinion in the favor of complete exoneration of the fuckery of the president.
    We have all watched Trey Gowdy interview James Comey under oath and there was no opinion in the answers Comey gave .... only fact.

  8. #8
    Veteran Member Chief's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    26,148
    Thanks
    6738

    From
    Earth
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller confirmed with Fox News on Saturday that agent Peter Strzok had been removed from Mueller’s investigation into Russia collusion after the Justice Department’s inspector general started examining Strzok's electronic messages with a colleague, which reportedly included ones that were anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton.

    Trump reloads on FBI's Clinton email probe, after reports of 'tainted' anti-Trump agent | Fox News

    So .... if Strzok is so tainted, that he can no longer work on the Trump witch hunt ..... errr ..... I mean the Russian collusion probe how is it that he was allowed to work on HRC's email probe?

    This is why a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to investigate not only HRC but, the investigators as well.

    It appears that this whole Democrat corrupt house of cards is about to come down.
    Actually your suggestion makes no sense. If anything, it shows that Mueller is not going to allow any bias. It will make whatever his final case is, that much stronger because he had the integrity to remove someone who may have been doing fine work, but created the possible appearance of impropriety.
    Thanks from MaryAnne and Blues63

  9. #9
    Veteran Member DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    31,622
    Thanks
    26696

    From
    SWUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by John T Ford View Post
    The office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller confirmed with Fox News on Saturday that agent Peter Strzok had been removed from Muellerís investigation into Russia collusion after the Justice Departmentís inspector general started examining Strzok's electronic messages with a colleague, which reportedly included ones that were anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton.

    Trump reloads on FBI's Clinton email probe, after reports of 'tainted' anti-Trump agent | Fox News

    So .... if Strzok is so tainted, that he can no longer work on the Trump witch hunt ..... errr ..... I mean the Russian collusion probe how is it that he was allowed to work on HRC's email probe?

    This is why a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to investigate not only HRC but, the investigators as well.

    It appears that this whole Democrat corrupt house of cards is about to come down.
    Thank God for small miracles. Someone tossed a drowning Trump a empty milk jug as a buoy.

    You treat Strzok as if he is the Coast Guard chopper coming to save Donald from the rough seas...no, Strzok is just an empty milk jug.

  10. #10
    the "good" prag pragmatic's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    28,947
    Thanks
    17496

    From
    between Moon and NYC
    Just not feeling the outrage here.

    Sounds like Mueller learned about a bad apple in the investigation and removed him from the equation.


    (From reports out, Strzok may not even be a field agent any longer. Re-assigned to the Human Resources department.)

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Peter Schiff at his best
    By muffins in forum Current Events
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th March 2010, 11:56 PM
  2. Peter Schiff
    By Zaragrunudgeyon in forum Economics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 1st December 2008, 09:27 PM
  3. Who is Peter Paul?
    By Ronin Tetsuro in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 6th June 2008, 07:09 PM
  4. Hello From Peter Parka
    By Peter Parka in forum New Users
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 4th September 2007, 10:00 PM

Search tags for this page

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed