Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
Thanks Tree4Thanks

Thread: Unions cowardly lie about why they go on strike

  1. #11
    Senior Member Loki's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,047
    Thanks
    3758

    From
    East coast USA
    The Building management corporations also know who is " qualified "
    Sheesh- my Union knows who is qualified- we have so many differant ratings to obtain and keep, many people are specialist.
    This pays little more but does garruntee work.
    Making you overqualified and paid same as " A " journeymman.
    The rest of us wire the buildings you see going up all around the area.
    There are Two hundred of us on the job I'm on.
    Almost done, transfer coming soon. To the hall or to another job. Work picture is fantastic currently.

  2. #12
    Shiny Purple Member namvet69's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,877
    Thanks
    3902

    From
    Englewood, Fl
    Quote Originally Posted by Neomalthusian View Post
    Who said anything about corporations? Municipal governments aren’t corporations.

    Should the law be followed, or shouldn’t it?
    I said something about corporations. Whether it's municipal gov't as employer or private enterprise, fed laws are heavily tilted in favor of employers as compared to before Reagan and union busting.

    Point is that the only real leverage that labor used to have as a bargaining chip has gone the way of every other advantage that workers used to have. And since corporations employ huge numbers it's no wonder those tools have gone away.

    Just as tax policy, environmental protections and even personhood have evolved into another impenetrable wall between worker bee and queen bee. When all power has been taken away from labor and handed to employers, labor has to fight in any way they can.

    I say, do what you need to do to carve out a decent living because waiting for corps or gov't at any level to restore fairness to the playing field is a losing game. You can disagree, but I know what I've seen over time.

  3. #13
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    14,458
    Thanks
    3871

    From
    AK
    Quote Originally Posted by namvet69 View Post
    I said something about corporations. Whether it's municipal gov't as employer or private enterprise, fed laws are heavily tilted in favor of employers as compared to before Reagan and union busting.
    This topic is about employers rights under the NLRA that have been in place since long before Reagan.

    [quote]Point is that the only real leverage that labor used to have as a bargaining chip has gone the way of every other advantage that workers used to have. And since corporations employ huge numbers it's no wonder those tools have gone away.

    This topic is not about corporations. This is about a public sector unions, a government union, going on strike and lying about it to get around federal law.

  4. #14
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    14,458
    Thanks
    3871

    From
    AK
    Update: Oakland, unions to go back to bargaining as strike goes on

    "The city’s final offer Thursday was a slight tweak from its earlier one. Previously, the city said it could offer up to a 2 percent raise in the second year of the contract contingent on revenue growth. Its latest proposed deal would guarantee half that and give an additional 1 percent on Jan. 1, 2019, if revenue targets are met.

    The SEIU’s counteroffer outlined a 4 percent increase in the second year of the contract, with wages increasing by 1 percent in each quarter.

    In her letter announcing the impasse, City Administrator Sabrina Landreth said Oakland could not reasonably afford what the union was proposing. She said some of the union’s demands were outside the scope of bargaining, and described the disagreement on wages as a “persistent gulf between the parties.”"

    But it's somehow not an economic strike. Truly amazing.

    The city should keep them striking for as long as it takes. Do not budge. Many union members absolutely hate striking and resent their union for making them do it. Many tire of it quickly. Many want to just return to work, but under union pressure feel they cannot. Workers often do not like going without paychecks just so that they act as puppets for their union bosses in the streets of Oakland. They want to work, they don't want this dissension and controversy, and they don't like this. The union is using them, so let them strike. The support from within for the strike will unravel.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Cowardly scumbag
    By The Man in forum World Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14th November 2017, 05:58 PM
  2. Police Unions astonished Republicans hate Unions.
    By thrilling in forum Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22nd March 2017, 01:02 PM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 4th December 2015, 12:25 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed