View Poll Results: should networks ban Kelly Ann Conway

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • no.

    10 47.62%
  • yeah.

    9 42.86%
  • undecided

    1 4.76%
  • other

    1 4.76%
  • leave Kelly Ann alone.

    1 4.76%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 81
Thanks Tree43Thanks

Thread: should networks ban Kelly Ann Conway?

  1. #71
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    65,821
    Thanks
    37366

    From
    in my head
    Quote Originally Posted by Puzzling Evidence View Post
    Kelly Ann Conway has a long record of supporting woman's issues.
    So does Hillary Clinton. That doesn't prevent cons from attacking her at every opportunity when she makes even the appearance of not caring about women.
    I don't expect many of you libs to bite, but she was appalled at how this was handled as well as Trump. Trump may have defended the two cabinit memberes who resigned, but make no mistake -- Trump was appaled that a gaffe like this was allowed.
    Appalled at the gaffe, but not appalled at the behavior of his staff members.

    I do believe that Trump should have his chief of staff hold a press conference and explain what happened.
    I'll bet he can't do that because it would make him look too bad.
    Thanks from the watchman

  2. #72
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    82,730
    Thanks
    45602

    From
    becoming more and more
    press conference today.
    Wow...just wow.

    "the president ....blah blah blah".
    Reporter: Why can't the president just say that himself.
    "he told me to come out and say that.

    Wow....


    Just wow.

  3. #73
    Senior Member vikingbeast's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2013
    Posts
    11,875
    Thanks
    6537

    From
    Banned Camp Segregation Unit
    Quote Originally Posted by MaryAnne View Post
    How many real Journalists are on Fox News? Most are simply pundits, paid to carry the party line.
    It's not news. It's talk radio with a higher budget.

  4. #74
    Veteran Member PACE's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    24,587
    Thanks
    20691

    From
    None of your business
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    yeah, I know, as if.
    It's not a serious question (not really). Of course, networks shouldn't be deciding who the WH chooses to represent them. Even though, Morning Joe has already banned her. Forgive me, if it pisses me off that the American tax payers have to pay for it. American tax payers shouldn't have to pay for her spewing out her "alternative facts" propaganda. Actually, know what? Strike that. Yes it is a serious question.
    Kellyanne is a glorified pollster who once worked for Manafort. That's enough to get fired in my opinion.

  5. #75
    Veteran Member Pragmatist's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    50,653
    Thanks
    15591

    Quote Originally Posted by Isalexi View Post
    One thing that I found ridiculous was she said that he didn’t get his security clearance because it takes so long. I kind of think the president of the United States has enough clout to get them to clear him as soon as possible.He had no right to be getting the highest briefings just like Jared Kushner
    The right was all up in arms over Hillary having a private server even though there was never any evidence anything was compromised or that she had any intention of doing so. Now we have multiple people in the Whitehouse looking at the most top secret shit and they don't even have a fucking security clearance? The president is sharing top secret intelligence with people that have NO fucking business seeing it but that's just fine?

    We aren't talking about the remote possibility that maybe something slipped through that should not have, we are talking about every fucking day the president sharing intel with people that have no business seeing it.
    Last edited by Pragmatist; 13th February 2018 at 04:08 AM.

  6. #76
    Veteran Member Pragmatist's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    50,653
    Thanks
    15591

    Quote Originally Posted by Miller47 View Post
    It's mostly just word differences.

    A "ban" would have to be rescinded, overturned, or reversed.

    A "policy" could be only temporary, and can be changed easily and quickly.

    It's the word "ban" that means censorship.

    Banned means not allowed.
    But they have every right to not invite her but that's not a ban? Jesus Christ you can make an idiot out of yourself easily.
    Thanks from the watchman

  7. #77
    Veteran Member
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    28,236
    Thanks
    7182

    From
    midwest
    Quote Originally Posted by Pragmatist View Post
    But they have every right to not invite her but that's not a ban? Jesus Christ you can make an idiot out of yourself easily.
    A "ban" is censorship.

    I woulda expected you to know that...

  8. #78
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    15,314
    Thanks
    8390

    From
    in the noggins of yip yappers
    Quote Originally Posted by ATLglock View Post
    If I needed someone to split hairs, you would be at the top of my list. Banning someone from an interview because they lie isn't censorship, because they can send someone else to give the information.

    What is so funny about all of this, is your faux poutrage over KAC being "censored", yet I have not seen you bat an eye when Trump said That is censorship. Learn the difference.
    Lol. Welcome to PH and it's crazies.
    Thanks from NightSwimmer

  9. #79
    Veteran Member Isalexi's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    35,208
    Thanks
    22072

    From
    Maryland
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    that's still a pretty messed up thing to say. In fact, no, I'm just going to have to completely disagree with you here. She was playing the same games with the truth she always does. It wasn't just some random allegation. It was investigated by the FBI and found to be credible enough that they held up his security clearance. Tapper is a news anchor. Yet, even if you applied the comparison the way Conway did, he'd be out of a job quicker than the WH moved to terminate Porter. Anyway, you don't say something like that to someones face. It's just flat out rude.
    Oh please, she never said tapper beat his wife.....he did a super interview and if she implied he beat his wife, You could be sure he would say something. This is what the right wingers do they take things out of context and I know thatís not usually what you do

  10. #80
    Veteran Member Isalexi's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    35,208
    Thanks
    22072

    From
    Maryland
    Quote Originally Posted by NightSwimmer View Post
    Individual networks may chose to ban any individual. That isn't government censorship.
    Using that logic, if I am not invited to speak at a university does it mean that I am banNed?

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Kelly Ann Conway....really?
    By Isalexi in forum Current Events
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 1st September 2017, 08:45 AM
  2. Kelly Anne Conway
    By MaryAnne in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 9th February 2017, 04:10 PM
  3. 5 Networks Admit
    By MaryAnne in forum Current Events
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 21st March 2016, 03:01 PM
  4. Should news networks compensate I reports?
    By EnigmaO01 in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13th March 2011, 11:59 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed