View Poll Results: should networks ban Kelly Ann Conway

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • no.

    10 47.62%
  • yeah.

    9 42.86%
  • undecided

    1 4.76%
  • other

    1 4.76%
  • leave Kelly Ann alone.

    1 4.76%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 81
Thanks Tree43Thanks

Thread: should networks ban Kelly Ann Conway?

  1. #1
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    82,730
    Thanks
    45602

    From
    becoming more and more

    should networks ban Kelly Ann Conway?

    yeah, I know, as if.
    It's not a serious question (not really). Of course, networks shouldn't be deciding who the WH chooses to represent them. Even though, Morning Joe has already banned her. Forgive me, if it pisses me off that the American tax payers have to pay for it. American tax payers shouldn't have to pay for her spewing out her "alternative facts" propaganda. Actually, know what? Strike that. Yes it is a serious question.
    Thanks from Friday13 and knight

  2. #2
    Bad Policy Good Politics DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    37,864
    Thanks
    32982

    From
    Border Fence
    She had a horrible Sunday morning run.

    That is what happens when you are a woman and staff throws you out there to defend Donald Trump on women's issues.
    Thanks from BigBob and Friday13

  3. #3
    Bad Policy Good Politics DebateDrone's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    37,864
    Thanks
    32982

    From
    Border Fence
    Melania Trump will be the first First Lady never to have performed one official function.

    Poor Betty Ford and Pat Nixon, even in their darkest days did not hide out.
    Thanks from BigBob

  4. #4
    We choose both. Amelia's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    45,963
    Thanks
    27979

    From
    Wisconsin
    Quote Originally Posted by DebateDrone View Post
    She had a horrible Sunday morning run.

    That is what happens when you are a woman and staff throws you out there to defend Donald Trump on women's issues.

    Almost sorry I missed it.
    Thanks from TennesseeRain

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Devil505's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    64,589
    Thanks
    21257

    From
    Mass and Florida
    Trump has his own network (Fox) and the bully pulpit we taxpayers pay for.
    Legitimate news organizations are under no legal obligation to broadcast his lies and propaganda.
    In reality, the patriotic thing for them to do is boycott all Trump droppings.

    I have already begun boycotting all the Trump lies/propaganda in the media and suggest we all should consider it pure spam at best.......enemy attacks at worst.
    Last edited by Devil505; 11th February 2018 at 01:01 PM.
    Thanks from BigBob and Friday13

  6. #6
    Civis americanus borealis Singularity's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    27,785
    Thanks
    19146

    From
    Kansas
    Don't watch any of the networks, but saw on Twitter today that she suggested that Rob Porter deserves presumption of innocence for wifebeating, same as Jake Tapper.

    She actually said that, to Tapper's face, in a way that implied that she was prepared to suggest Tapper is a wifebeater if he didn't shut up about the issue without conclusive proof.

    I'm amazed that he didn't boot her off the show right there. Probably because doing so only made Trump like Stephen Miller more, so it does no good.

    But it further does no good to host administration flaks who cast personal aspersions on specific journalists at the host network without evidence.
    Thanks from the watchman, Madeline and Friday13

  7. #7
    DEEP STATE CEO Blues63's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    9,946
    Thanks
    7431

    From
    SPECTRE HQ
    No, let the idiot publicly hang herself with her own stupidity.
    Thanks from Madeline and BigBob

  8. #8
    "Mr. Original". the watchman's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    82,730
    Thanks
    45602

    From
    becoming more and more
    here it is....
    Thanks from knight

  9. #9
    Veteran Member Madeline's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    57,904
    Thanks
    33510

    From
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by the watchman View Post
    yeah, I know, as if.
    It's not a serious question (not really). Of course, networks shouldn't be deciding who the WH chooses to represent them. Even though, Morning Joe has already banned her. Forgive me, if it pisses me off that the American tax payers have to pay for it. American tax payers shouldn't have to pay for her spewing out her "alternative facts" propaganda. Actually, know what? Strike that. Yes it is a serious question.
    No, censorship is not the answer.

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Devil505's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    64,589
    Thanks
    21257

    From
    Mass and Florida
    Quote Originally Posted by Madeline View Post
    No, censorship is not the answer.
    There is no legal or moral requirement for private businesses to broadcast lies and propaganda from any source.
    You may call it censorship but I call it a public service.
    (we didn't rebroadcast Tokyo Rose during WWII either)
    Thanks from BigBob

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Kelly Ann Conway....really?
    By Isalexi in forum Current Events
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 1st September 2017, 08:45 AM
  2. Kelly Anne Conway
    By MaryAnne in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 9th February 2017, 04:10 PM
  3. 5 Networks Admit
    By MaryAnne in forum Current Events
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 21st March 2016, 03:01 PM
  4. Should news networks compensate I reports?
    By EnigmaO01 in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13th March 2011, 11:59 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed