| || |
This is the whole reason why we need to develope a "pregnancy vaccine." It should be safe, effective, free, and completely reversible. It should be available to anyone who wants it. It should be made to work for both males and females who want it.
It would take two people who both wanted to have a baby to have a baby.
It would end the "mistakes." It would make abortion obsolete. It wouldn't matter if abortion was legal or not. We just wouldn't have anyone seeking an abortion.
Do we even know when she had the kids? Let me guess, she was married to a soldier who went off to Iraq who died over there. She had her kids when she still had a husband who she thought the govt would support her if he died. The govt did by putting her on welfare. She didn't want to be on welfare but was only taking it because she wanted to become a nurse to support her family. You're saying she shouldn't have had her kids with her husband because she couldn't see the future. Perhaps her husband didn't die in iraq, he just ran out on her, or died in a car accident. How can you assume so much about this womans situation from this article?
If you are going to follow that idea, then it would be impossible to find any welfare that is not slavery, even if it is incredibly supported.
What's the difference if I have to leave the country or to leave my home?I would see the problem with forcing people to pay that tax if it is federal and therefore the only way to avoid it is to leave the country.
All welfare is slavery, PERIOD. If it's "incredibly supported" let the incredible supporters fund it on their own. They will end up serving the people better with less government waste and more control themselves over what they support where the government can have a change of heart any time. Best of all, they won't have to violate the rights of someone else to do it.If you are going to follow that idea, then it would be impossible to find any welfare that is not slavery, even if it is incredibly supported.
Isn't a "win win" better than a "win lose?"
Those people would probably not want the vaccine.
There is a large sector of society that has sex, many times unprotected, outside of marriage. They do get pregnant as a result. Some cannot afford the children they produce. Some get abortions.
You cannot stop others from having sex so offer them an alternative that will not breed a new crop of leaches on society milking the public teet.
There is a problem with government welfare being inneficent but that isn't inherent in local programs.
Anyway, the point with local communitty welfare is that it is only present when the people agree on it, so it isn't as much different form charity as you think. It also isn't slavery because someone can easily move to a different town.
What you say about welfare is true today, but welfare does not need to be that extreme.