Members banned from this thread: tubig


Page 15 of 21 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 210

Thread: State Dept. Confirms: Marines on 9/11/12 Were Protecting U.S. Embassy

  1. #141
    Senior Member MGunner's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    11,920
    Thanks
    1430

    From
    Smack in the middle of Obamatopia
    Quote Originally Posted by USA-1 View Post
    They had no ammo? Right. No warning? It was a war zone for crying out loud.
    Why weren't you outraged at the incompetence that led to to deaths of 240 marines like you are at the death of 4 Americans?
    I was outraged at the time... my step brother was there in Beirut at the time. What the fuck does something that happened 30 years ago have to do with the events of today? Stop deflecting.

  2. #142
    Senior Member MGunner's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    11,920
    Thanks
    1430

    From
    Smack in the middle of Obamatopia
    Quote Originally Posted by Blueneck View Post
    How about staying in Tripoli?
    Why?

  3. #143
    Senior Member MGunner's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    11,920
    Thanks
    1430

    From
    Smack in the middle of Obamatopia
    Quote Originally Posted by USA-1 View Post
    Have the local militia guarding him give him a ride to the airport.
    LMAO!!! Right! Let the locals take him! You are naive. Why not just climb to the top of the embassy and jump off head first. Save the locals the trouble of killing him.

    Quote Originally Posted by USA-1 View Post
    Libya is the wild west which is why we didn't have an embassy there and why Stevens was trying to set one up.
    Ahh... so now we had no embassy. Got it. Then the need for Marine security was an even bigger need then we originally understood. What a clusterfuck which is par for the course for Obama.

  4. #144
    ... USA-1's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    27,367
    Thanks
    3

    Quote Originally Posted by MGunner View Post
    LMAO!!! Right! Let the locals take him! You are naive. Why not just climb to the top of the embassy and jump off head first. Save the locals the trouble of killing him.

    Ahh... so now we had no embassy. Got it. Then the need for Marine security was an even bigger need then we originally understood. What a clusterfuck which is par for the course for Obama.
    Are you fucking nuts or what? They were not in the USA. The diplomatic corp were dependent on the local militia for protection. Six embassy marine Guards would not have made any difference and you are stupid if you think they would have. The host country has the ultimate responsibility for embassy security. Six marines can not hold off an entire country.
    It's almost comical how you think six marines could have prevented an RPG attack.

    If a thousand right wing nuts attacked the Iranian embassy here in the US who would protect it? Americans. The host country.
    Last edited by USA-1; 16th October 2012 at 12:02 PM.

  5. #145
    ... USA-1's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    27,367
    Thanks
    3

    Quote Originally Posted by MGunner View Post
    I was outraged at the time... my step brother was there in Beirut at the time. What the fuck does something that happened 30 years ago have to do with the events of today? Stop deflecting.
    Because you are giving a pass and defending Reagan for 240 Marines murdered yet outraged at four Americans killed.
    Reagan's cut and run after the murders ushered in modern terrorism. He helped create Al qaeda.
    You blaming the administration instead of the terrorists shows what a traitor you are. You are giving comfort and emboldening the enemy.
    Last edited by USA-1; 16th October 2012 at 12:04 PM.

  6. #146
    Senior Member Snikitz's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,489
    Thanks
    1088

    From
    Split between Minnesota and New Orleans
    Quote Originally Posted by USA-1 View Post
    They had no ammo? Right. No warning? It was a war zone for crying out loud.
    Why weren't you outraged at the incompetence that led to to deaths of 240 marines like you are at the death of 4 Americans?
    Blowup in Beirut: U.S. Marines Peacekeeping Mission Turns Deadly

    The multinational forces were positioned between several national armies and factional militia groups, all heavily armed. The rules of engagement (ROE) severely restricted the use of force, not allowing Marines to carry loaded weapons, allowing them to shoot only if they could verify that their lives were in danger and only if they could clearly identify a specific target.
    I was outraged then, just as I am now. When that happened I was 20 years old and working under the same fucked up ROI. I've stood guard duty after terrorist attacks holding a rifle with no ammo.

    What I want to know, is why are you yammering about ancient history when our people today are in danger as a result of an incompetent administration?

  7. #147
    ... USA-1's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    27,367
    Thanks
    3

    Quote Originally Posted by Snikitz View Post
    Blowup in Beirut: U.S. Marines Peacekeeping Mission Turns Deadly



    I was outraged then, just as I am now. When that happened I was 20 years old and working under the same fucked up ROI. I've stood guard duty after terrorist attacks holding a rifle with no ammo.

    What I want to know, is why are you yammering about ancient history when our people today are in danger as a result of an incompetent administration?
    Because someone brought it up and defended Reagan.
    What irritates me is how you traitors have taken the side of terrorists and moments after the attacks tried to blame the Administration. Do you know how much comfort that gives to our enemies. You people make me sick.
    Why do you mfers hate this country so much?

  8. #148
    Senior Member Snikitz's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,489
    Thanks
    1088

    From
    Split between Minnesota and New Orleans
    Quote Originally Posted by USA-1 View Post
    Because you are giving a pass and defending Reagan for 240 Marines murdered yet outraged at four Americans killed.
    Reagan's cut and run after the murders ushered in modern terrorism. He helped create Al qaeda.
    You blaming the administration instead of the terrorists shows what a traitor you are. You are giving comfort and emboldening the enemy.

    All presidents since the early 1970's in one way or another did something to piss off the mid-east. Remember it was under the last liberal incompetent president, a dumb ass peanut farmer, that a U.S. Embassy was taken over by Islamic nut jobs.

    No one is blaming Obama's administration for the attack. The potential negligence of the administration to take steps to protect U.S. embassy personal is being questioned. Following that, Obama is being challenged on his failure to simply tell the truth concerning the nature of the attack. Anyone with half a brain and/or any military training who saw the very first videos of terrorists running around with RPGs and the reports of sustained mortar fire defined the attack as organized and terrorist in nature.

    Wouldn't lying to the american people and concealing the nature of the attack better suit the definition of giving comfort and emboldening the enemy?

  9. #149
    Who let the posse out goldendog's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    24,267
    Thanks
    3529

    From
    Posseville USA
    Quote Originally Posted by Snikitz View Post
    All presidents since the early 1970's in one way or another did something to piss off the mid-east. Remember it was under the last liberal incompetent president, a dumb ass peanut farmer, that a U.S. Embassy was taken over by Islamic nut jobs.

    No one is blaming Obama's administration for the attack. The potential negligence of the administration to take steps to protect U.S. embassy personal is being questioned. Following that, Obama is being challenged on his failure to simply tell the truth concerning the nature of the attack. Anyone with half a brain and/or any military training who saw the very first videos of terrorists running around with RPGs and the reports of sustained mortar fire defined the attack as organized and terrorist in nature.

    Wouldn't lying to the american people and concealing the nature of the attack better suit the definition of giving comfort and emboldening the enemy?
    Bullshit..candidate Romney did that very thing on the first day. He came out and outright accused President Obama of supporting terrorism. Stuffing his foot as far down his throat as it could go in the process.
    He looked and sounded like a compete idiot while doing so.
    He was in a rush to use the Ambassadors death as a political tool..with that shit eating grin on his face while doing so.

    Just the way i knew the Republicans would conduct themselves after a terrorist attack.

    Gutless and self absorbed.

  10. #150
    Senior Member Snikitz's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,489
    Thanks
    1088

    From
    Split between Minnesota and New Orleans
    Quote Originally Posted by USA-1 View Post
    Because someone brought it up and defended Reagan.
    What irritates me is how you traitors have taken the side of terrorists and moments after the attacks tried to blame the Administration. Do you know how much comfort that gives to our enemies. You people make me sick.
    Why do you mfers hate this country so much?
    You know, I don't think I have seen a more stupid statement even out of Huxster.

    I am going to repeat myself....

    No one is blaming Obama's administration for the attack. The potential negligence of the administration to take steps to protect U.S. embassy personal is being questioned. Following that, Obama is being challenged on his failure to simply tell the truth concerning the nature of the attack. Anyone with half a brain and/or any military training who saw the very first videos of terrorists running around with RPGs and the reports of sustained mortar fire defined the attack as organized and terrorist in nature.

    Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State has admitted the first accusation - that the State Department failed to react to the build up before the attack and the Ambassador's request. Enough said on that. Obama's staff has changed their story on the second part to state that the attacks were indeed terrorist in nature and not simply a reaction by ignorant fanatics to a dumb ass amateur film on youtube.

    the question you should be asking is why your president lied to you for two weeks.

Page 15 of 21 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed