Thread: Are You a Slut Flowchart

Originally Posted by Ronin Tetsuro

Both are fictions in your mind, guiding you to idiocy.

No they are both non-fiction in my mind. I believe in God, ergo, I believe in the Devil. This being based in faith not fact. Faith is fictitious only in the minds who think it fiction. To know otherwise is to possess the extraordinary ability to read minds. Which, if I am not mistaken, a phenomenon considered mostly fictitious.

I believe that it is a fact that liberals exist. The empirical evidence is not only overwhelming on this forum, it is so prevalent that the term Liberal has been applied to a large portion of people who hold a certain political and social ideology. Therefore, it is you on the path to idiocy as you think that Liberals are fictitious, and mind reading is a common practice.

Originally Posted by Liberal Doses

Ok, first Rush is called a mere entertainer.

That is what right wing apologists call him.

Now he is the voice of the Republican party.

That is what everyone else calls him.

Which is it?

It is your standard level Liberal Doses confusion and inability to parse reality as it exists outside of talking points.

Originally Posted by Liberal Doses

No they are both non-fiction in my mind. I believe in God

Faith. Based on nothing. Valid, but sadly idiocy.

Originally Posted by Ronin Tetsuro

That is what right wing apologists call him.



That is what everyone else calls him.



It is your standard level Liberal Doses confusion and inability to parse reality as it exists outside of talking points.

With regards to "entertainer." Actually, several left wing media pundits, when it was to their advantage brushed Rush off as being an mere entertainer.

As to that is what everyone else calls him a leader of the Republican Party. Just who is everyone else? I think that broad statement would include all political spectrums.

Seems your confusion on this matter is equal to your delusion regarding mind reading.

Originally Posted by Ronin Tetsuro

Faith. Based on nothing. Valid, but sadly idiocy.

While we have no actual, definitive proof that God exists, neither do we have the same proof that he does not. Hence faith and not fact. We do however have in addition to the more recognized and spectacular incidents in the Bible some tangible and rather seemingly ordinary and innocuous matters. Matters revealed in the Bible which are so compelling in a manner that it belies the ordinary and innocuous. Contemplation on these minor subtleties brings about their rather surprising importance to such a degree that they soon reveal the extraordinary.

Originally Posted by Liberal Doses

While we have no actual, definitive proof that God exists, neither do we have the same proof that he does not. Hence faith and not fact. We do however have in addition to the more recognized and spectacular incidents in the Bible some tangible and rather seemingly ordinary and innocuous matters. Matters revealed in the Bible which are so compelling in a manner that it belies the ordinary and innocuous. Contemplation on these minor subtleties brings about their rather surprising importance to such a degree that they soon reveal the extraordinary.

Faith is an individual decision that has no bearing on any discussion based in reality or underpinned by logic.

Originally Posted by Ronin Tetsuro

Faith is an individual decision that has no bearing on any discussion based in reality or underpinned by logic.

So how is it you come by your definition of faith if not logic? Logic would dictate that one could not determine that faith is an individual decision without a reality based observation. That fact that this very discussion we are having is taking place in the realm of reality provides that there is indeed a bearing on this discussion.

Originally Posted by Liberal Doses

Oh, yeah she was possibly hung by her Democrat clients before she exposed them.

Possibly???....lol